baltimoresun.com

« Priest won't face charges in sex with teen | Main | N.Y. imam: Mosque debate could shape relations »

September 1, 2010

Give it away, give it away, give it away now

The Rev. Jason Poling is Pastor of New Hope Community Church in Pikesville.

The commentary page in this morning's Baltimore Sun carries a piece I wrote on the major gubernatorial candidates’ low levels of charitable giving, as first reported in the Sun over the weekend.

One issue that space didn’t permit me to explore was the question of whether one should give based on pre- or post-tax income. Some teach that we should give a percentage of our take-home pay, since that’s really the only money we have any control over. Others say that we should give a percentage of pre-tax income, since we are called to give of our “first fruits,” that is, of the first and best that we yield.

I incline strongly toward the latter view, for two reasons. Theologically, I can’t get past the idea that Uncle Sam would get his cut before God does. But from the perspective of personal responsibility, I think it’s essential for us to recognize that the big number on our pay stub is in fact what we’re getting paid — and that what we take home is that amount less the money that we have withheld as payment for other things.

In regard to some of those things we have no choice: our employers are required to deduct payroll taxes and to withhold income taxes. On others we do, and most of us should choose to have money withheld for retirement plans, health care and disability premiums, etc. Some employers even allow us to make charitable contributions directly out of our paychecks. But in all cases, the amount we take home is simply the number that ends up on our checks (or deposited directly in our bank accounts) after certain payments have reduced the amount we actually got paid. We might take home, say, $1000, but that doesn’t change the fact that we got paid $1,500.

Some people believe that the amount one gives should be reduced in accordance with the fact that some functions covered by the “tithe” as directed in the Old Testament are handled by government — after all, ancient Israel was a theocratic nation-state. Others respond that if you add up the various “tithes” commanded the actual amount God instructed his people to give is closer to 27 percent than 10 percent, and involves giving a combination of a portion of both income and assets.

Probably the consensus view among evangelicals, at least, is that the tithe is not mandatory for Christians — this being a specific commandment of Torah that is not binding on those of us who are not ancient Israelites — but that it’s a very good idea to give away a significant portion of your income and 10 percent seems to be a good figure. For one thing, it’s very useful for those of us who are bad at math to simply move the decimal point over one place. But it’s also a figure significant enough to be meaningful without being so high as to be impossible. Don’t believe me? Believe the surveys that consistently show the most generous contributors to charitable causes are the working class and the very wealthy. The very wealthy can easily afford to give away well in excess of 10 percent of their incomes; the working class give away a fairly small amount in actual dollars when they give away even 10 percent.

The problem, it seems, comes when we move into the middle class. It’s counterintuitive, but for most folks it’s harder to give away $10,000 when they make $100,000 than it is to give away $5,000 when they make $50,000 — even though they have $50,000 more to play with. Perhaps it’s because things that were once out of reach become accessible; perhaps it’s because so many things are accessible that we think we can (or should) have not only the ski vacation but the new car and the private school tuition and the granite countertops and the boat and the spa weekend and the season tickets and so on and so on and so on.

The beauty of giving generously, even sacrificially, is that by doing so we are forced to deal with our own finitude, with the fact that for most of us our appetites can never be fully satisfied, that if we seek to gratify ourselves in every conceivable way we’ll still find ourselves wanting more. Giving — especially giving a specific percentage right off the top — is a discipline that ultimately frees us to allocate the money we have in accordance with our best ideals rather than simply to gratify our basest desires.

Not to mention it helps out a whole lot of people who need that money more than we do.

So try it out. Next time you get paid, immediately take 10 percent of the big number on your pay stub (not the really big year-to-date number, of course, but the big one for your pay this period) and give it to a worthy cause. We have three international relief organizations headquartered right here in Baltimore; our church sponsors World Relief, but there’s also Catholic Relief Services and Lutheran World Relief. Your local food bank can always use funds, especially since for all the fun we have rounding up canned goods it’s much more efficient for them to receive cash donations and use them to buy food from vendors at a steep discount. Our church sponsors the Community Crisis Center, which serves needy people in the Reisterstown-Owings Mills area. Baltimore is also host to a number of fine educational institutions; our church supports the Ecumenical Institute of Theology at St. Mary’s Seminary and University. And don’t forget the cultural institutions keeping those starving artists fed; my wife is a conductor for the Greater Baltimore Youth Orchestras, which run a wonderful program that puts instruments in the hands of the neediest schoolchildren in Baltimore.

No doubt my fellow In Good Faith readers have their own favorite charities; please, list them in the comments. Perhaps O’Malley and Ehrlich campaign staff will wander through soon looking to do some damage control.

Posted by Matthew Hay Brown at 5:00 AM | | Comments (4)
        

Comments

I put Catholic Charities of Maryland at the top of my list in general, Our Daily Bread on Fallsway in particular.

There are some people in Baltimore who would have nothing to eat were in not for them.

I like Smile Train, the folks who repair children's cleft palates. 100% of the funds they raise go to these surgeries. They apparently have "angels" who pay for their advertising.
There's a 3 min. video, "Smile Pinki", about one of the children they helped at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CamEXQ8x72c

1 Timothy 5:8 (NIV) - If anyone does not provide for his relatives, and especially for his immediate family, he has denied the faith and is worse than an unbeliever.

In 1 Timothy 5:8 we are told to first provide for our immediate family and our relatives before providing for others. In other words, we should provide for our needs, the needs of our immediate family, and the needs of relatives, before we give anything to the church.

OLD TESTAMENT - THE FIRST OF THE FRUITS SHOULD GO TO GOD

Proverbs 3:9 (KJV) “Honour the LORD with thy substance, and with the firstfruits of all thine increase:”

NEW TESTAMENT - THE WORKER SHOULD BE FIRST TO RECEIVE A SHARE OF THE FRUUT

2 Timothy 2:6 (KJV) “The husbandman that laboureth must be first partaker of the fruits.”

In the Old Testament, every single time the Word speaks of giving the firstfruits, it is talking about crops (assets) and never income.

Gary the reason firstfruits rather than income is mentioned is that in biblical times most people were farmers or raised livestoock. They didn't work jobs as we have them today.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Matthew Hay Brown
Matthew Hay Brown writes and blogs about faith and values in public and private life for The Baltimore Sun. A former Washington correspondent for the newspaper, he has long written about the intersection of religion and politics. He has reported from Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, traveling most recently to Syria and Jordan to write about the Iraqi refugee crisis.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Religion in the news
Charm City Current
Stay connected