baltimoresun.com

« France expels illegal Roma immigrants | Main | Swazi healers accused of raiding graves »

July 29, 2010

Texas, feds in line to try polygamist leader Jeffs

A Utah Supreme Court decision that overturns polygamous church leader Warren Jeffs' 2007 criminal conviction won't automatically make him a free man, the Associated Press reports. Even if Utah doesn't retry him, Texas and federal prosecutors are waiting to move forward with their own cases.

Justices on Tuesday unanimously said Jeffs should get a new trial because state attorneys overreached in their argument that performing the marriage of a 14-year-old girl to her 19-year-old cousin amounted to facilitating a rape.

Utah officials now have two weeks to seek a rehearing before the state's high court and then a month to decide if they'll retry the 54-year-old head of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints on charges of first-degree felony rape as an accomplice.

A judge Wednesday set an Aug. 18 date for a hearing on a motion from Jeffs' defense attorneys seeking a "speedy trial before a jury of his peers."

Meanwhile, authorities in Texas are trying to get Jeffs sent there to face charges in connection with his own alleged marriages to underage girls in 2005. A federal indictment stemming from Jeffs' stint as a fugitive on the FBI's Ten Most Wanted list is also pending.

"He would not go free," said Melodie Rydalch, spokeswoman for the U.S. attorney's office in Utah.

Any federal prosecution would likely come after cases in Utah and Texas are resolved, Rydalch said, but in the hours after the ruling, it was unclear just how the states would proceed.

"We're going to take a look at this case anew and do a legal analysis of the ruling," Deputy Washington County Attorney Brian Filter said. "We're going to talk to the victim and to law enforcement. What we've done from the beginning is tried to seek justice in the case, and that's what we're going to continue to do. Where that takes us, I don't know."

In 2007, a jury convicted Jeffs on two counts of rape as an accomplice for his role in the 2001 spiritual marriage of Elissa Wall and Allen Steed.

Jeffs performed the marriage ceremony in a Caliente, Nev., motel and later counseled Wall to be obedient and give her "mind, body and soul" to her husband to make her marriage work.

The Associated Press does not typically name victims of alleged sexual assault, but Wall has frequently spoken publicly about the case.

During the trial and later in her book, "Stolen Innocence," Wall said she objected to the marriage and was forced into sexual relations with her husband.

Prosecutors argued that Jeffs' abuse of his religious authority made him guilty of accomplice rape.

But in its ruling, Utah's high court said 5th District Judge James Shumate improperly rejected defense-proposed jury instructions that would have required the panel to determine that Jeffs intended for a rape to occur when he conducted the marriage.

The court also said state attorneys were wrong to equate Jeffs' actions and role as a religious leader with Steed's alleged act. Steed was charged with rape the day after Jeffs' conviction, but the case has never been resolved.

Jeffs' defense attorney Wally Bugden said the state was so invested in bringing down "an unpopular religious figure" that it relied on the wrong legal theories.

"They mixed and matched and confused the theories of accomplice liability, with the theories of lack of consent ... stretching, pushing the law beyond the limits of what was reasonable so that ultimately the Supreme Court agreed with us basically on every point that all of the jury instructions were wrong," Bugden said.

At a courthouse news conference, Wall called the court's ruling "emotionally devastating" but said justice had not been served and she would find the strength to testify against Jeffs again if needed.

"This is not the end and I, by no means, am backing down," she said. "I am still in shocked understanding that there is a huge possibility that we would do this all again and more than anything, that Warren Jeffs is possibly going to walk away."

Assistant Utah Attorney General Laura Dupaix called the court's ruling unfortunate and said it could make it harder to prosecute people who force young girls into unwanted marriages.

The FLDS church is one of at least 11 distinct self-described Mormon fundamentalist communities that consider plural marriage an essential religious doctrine that brings exaltation in heaven.

"I don't think the ruling forecloses us continuing to go after men like Warren Jeffs and prosecuting them for their crimes, which the state considers heinous," DuPaix said.

Tuesday's ruling also comes as Washington County authorities investigate allegations that Wall may have lied about her medical records that were used in the trial. Filter declined to comment on the status of that investigation or its impact on any decision about a future prosecution of Jeffs.

Texas authorities have charged Jeff with bigamy, sexual assault of a child and aggravated assault related to alleged marriages between Jeffs and girls ages 17 and 15 in 2005. The cases are based on information from family records gathered during a 2008 raid on a church ranch near Eldorado.

After Tuesday's ruling, however, an extradition hearing in 3rd District Court was canceled because Texas' request to bring Jeffs there was based on his status as a convicted felon in custody. It will now have to be refiled in 5th District Court.

Jeffs will oppose extradition, Bugden said.

Wall said she has not been contacted by Texas authorities cases, but said she is hopeful that the lack of accomplice liability issues in those cases will make it "easier for them to have a conviction stick."

Jeffs has been serving two consecutive terms of five years to life at the Utah State Prison, but with the court's reversal, he is now considered innocent and should soon be moved back to Washington County's jail, Bugden said.

Jeffs' lawyers hope to secure his release, but it seems unlikely that would occur. Federal prosecutors planned to file a detainer for Jeffs with the jail late Tuesday, Rydalch said.

"Even if everything else goes away, he would come in on the federal charges," she said.

Posted by Matthew Hay Brown at 6:45 AM | | Comments (11)
        

Comments

Maybe in Texas, where they have no problems executing people who are retarded, or proved innocent before and after the fact, Jeffs might get the justice Utah seems unwilling to mete out.

Bobbie You are a real hypocrite. On the one hand you mock the judicial system in Texas making allegation without providing support as you usually do then state that same system would be ok for someone you dislike not because of anything he's done, but because he happens to Mormon. Don't insult anyone's intelligence by claiming that comment was based on what happened in Utah. No one who has read your angry childish rants buys that.

Moniker Challenged Anonymous - Mr. Jeffs is guilty of the charges as anyone could possibly be. His trial laid out his guilt for all to see. He was convicted and put where he belongs. That the Utah Supreme Court would overturn his conviction on a flimsy and possibly trumped up reason, is to be suspected. I would not want my fate in the hands of the Texas justice system, where they have an express lane for execution (which I oppose for a variety of reasons anywhere) , but it might be the venue where a cultist, child abusing, megalomaniacal idiot might find the justice he deserves, and hopefully till the day he dies.

Bully Bobbie - As another poster already gave you a lesson in the legal reasons why it was overturned I won't repeat it since you are too stuck on your own made up nonsense. I leave you with a challeneg you've made to many Christain. Provide proof that the actions of the court were trumped up or flimsy. Otherwise I'll have to conclude it's your delusional mind at work denying something because you don't like it.

Are you against the death penalty? If so then wishing for someone to get it would make you a hypocrite. Of course doing the same thing you attack others for - believing things not proven makes you one as well.

Moniker Coward Anonymous - Where have I called for the execution of anyone? Until the day he dies, is the length of the sentence that Mr. Jeffs should endure, and I hope it is a long long time.

Oh, and by the way, I don't like child rape and religious slavery, which are the crimes Mr. Jeffs committed. Standing in defense of someone who does practice such despicable acts puts you in an untenable position.

Here in America, Robert, everyone accused of a crime is entitled to a defense.

Moniker Challenged Anonymous - It is YOUR defense of Mr. Jeffs that is suspect. The legal system is corruptible as the executions of so many that were not guilty of the crimes they were accused of, in the name of expediency, or bigotry, and the slap on the hand meted out for heinous crimes for those who are connected to the power structure in some way. The Mormon court in Utah, can hardly be expected to treat someone that their twisted dogma and history tell them are morally correct. Religion is a corruption of thought that can NEVER be trusted because it is based on a lie and perpetrated by fraud.

I neither support nor condemn Mr. Jeffs. Your error is to think I'm choosing sides. I'm not. I support the rule of law, that's all.

If you have some reason to believe that the Utah Supreme Court has acted improperly then the onus is on you to show it. Not shout it Robert. Show it. Your suggestion that the court is biased is ridiculous. As are you.

BTW, There are two anonymous' writing here. Have fun figuring it all out.

Bobbie - The only thing I've defended is the leagl system which you have deluuded ourself is flawed. Let me try and simplify it. Prove your claims or aaccept being called what you have called others a deluded fool.

To ALL of the inconsiderate Anonymouses - I stand pat. The truth that the poor get shafted in our legal system, the rich get the easy ride, and vested interests take care of their own, are all basic principles of American jurisprudence. You get what you can pay for.

Bobbie - I guess that means you can't prove your accusation. Maybe you should keep that in mind next time before demanding proof from others.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Matthew Hay Brown
Matthew Hay Brown writes and blogs about faith and values in public and private life for The Baltimore Sun. A former Washington correspondent for the newspaper, he has long written about the intersection of religion and politics. He has reported from Africa, Asia, Europe, Latin America and the Middle East, traveling most recently to Syria and Jordan to write about the Iraqi refugee crisis.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Religion in the news
Charm City Current
Stay connected