Autopsy: Detroit imam shot 20 times in FBI raid
A Muslim prayer leader accused of encouraging his followers to commit violence against the U.S. government was shot 20 times during an FBI raid at a suburban warehouse last fall, the Associated Press reports.
The autopsy was completed a month after Luqman Ameen Abdullah's death, but Dearborn police were granted a delay in releasing the results while they investigate the Oct. 28 shooting, said Dr. Carl Schmidt, Wayne County's chief medical examiner.
Abdullah, 53, died instantly, he said. The FBI says agents were trying to arrest Abdullah at a Dearborn warehouse when he resisted and fired a gun.
Schmidt said Abdullah's body was handcuffed and on the floor of a semitrailer when his investigator arrived at the shooting scene.
"You cannot tell by the gunshot wounds whether he was lying down, standing up, sitting" when he was shot, Schmidt told reporters. "It is impossible to say which one was the fatal gunshot wound. It was a combination of gunshot wounds."
The Council on American-Islamic Relations has demanded an independent investigation of the shooting.
“The shocking details of the imam’s autopsy raise a number of disturbing questions that need to be answered,” Dawud Walid, executive director of CAIR’s Michigan chapter, said in a statement over the weekend after a leak apparently suggested Abdullah had been shot 21 times.
“First of all, did the FBI agents follow established procedure when they shot the imam 21 times?" Walid asked. "How was the imam shot in the back? Was it proper procedure to handcuff either a dead body or a mortally-wounded suspect? If the agents found the imam alive following the shooting, did they call for medical assistance? All these questions need answers.”
FBI spokeswoman Sandra Berchtold said anyone subject to an arrest warrant is handcuffed "no matter what the circumstances" for the safety of agents and the public.






Comments
Strangely, this seems very controversial, the FBI is known for following procedure correctly, but after reading this you could make an argument that a mistake was made, HANDCUFF ALL SUSPECTS? and SHOT 20 TIMES? i find it highly unlikely that they handcuffed a suspect that was shot 20 times, he was most likely dead when they engaged in cuffing him.
Posted by: Tony | February 1, 2010 11:08 PM
Fear of extreme Islam--Islamophobia, if you will, is probably pervasive by now in our law enforcement and intelligence agencies. We have the Fort Hood incident, the various sleeper cells that have been awoken and arrested, we have Tarek Mehanna, David Coleman Headley, none of these guys or incidents are very reassuring to law enforcement--who are by now probably paranoid and afraid of making a deadly error that could cost dearly in American lives and property. Shooting this imam so viciously and repeatedly is clearly an abuse of authority, a case of runaway reaction to the imam's extremist provocations, a signal or a message if you will, to the extreme Islamists lurking among Americans as to what could happen to them if they wag their tails the wrong way--violence of this sort certainly sends a message to the Muslims--it may seem impetuous and not premeditated but I doubt that this was the way the imam's cookie crumbled--the frightening lesson to be learned from this incident is that US law enforcement is on the edge, it is losing patience and restraint, it is scared of making mistakes, it had rather fall on the side of violence and overreaction than on the side of "wait and see" or on the side of measured steps--law abiding Muslims will now fear for their lives--will fear to express themselves freely in public, will be scared for their children--these are difficult times for good Muslims across the world--and especially in the West and in America, these are tense times for the followers of Allah--they are unable to deal effectively with the extremists in their midst--they want to enjoy the Western privileges of civil liberties and various freedoms--they don't want to be assaulted by suspicious and hateful elements in law enforcement but as long as terror continues as an Islamic force these sorts of confrontations are inevitable--the FBI officers involved should be thoroughly questioned--the incident should be exhaustively probed--punishment should be meted out for exaggerated and reflexive violence and any future similar incidents should be prevented by proper vetting of new FBI recruits and rigorous training of existing ones. We cannot afford to alienate more young Muslims--we cannot afford to scare them and drive them straight into the arms of these kinds of imams. We always have the option to deport incendiary imams back to where they came from or hang the threat of such deportation over their heads to control their provocations. But we have no right to kill them or precipitate a situation that would inevitably lead to violence.
Ravensfan Anon
Posted by: Anonymous | February 2, 2010 9:55 AM
And how long should law enforcement "wait and see"?
I find it ironic that you use the term incendiary.
When dealing with terror suspects law enforcement has only milliseconds to assess whether the suspect is wearing a bomb and that they might detonate it. When the suspect does not do as commanded when commanded and makes a sudden movement it might be the last thing that law enforcement and any civilians in close proximity might see.
The only thing that I hope is that one of these shots hit the "off switch", if not they need to get to the range.
Posted by: Paul | February 3, 2010 3:59 AM
Paul, don't wait and see--shoot and think--then welcome yourself to a world of never ending terror.
Ravensfan Anon
Posted by: Anonymous | February 3, 2010 10:02 AM
"Fear of extreme Islam"? As a former law enforcement officer, I can tell you that's the last thing on our minds when we encounter an armed subject. Yes, the possibility that he/she may be a suicide bomber is present and we are mindfull of it. But when a gun is presented as a threat to us the talking stops and the shooting starts. If this person didn't want to be shot once, twice, twenty or fifty times he should have followed the agents orders. He IS NOT the good guy and should not in any way be grieved for.
I've been to police funerals. I grieve for their families. If Ravensfan Anon really wants to do something meaningfull, he should work with young muslims, teaching them that Allah would not condone violence.
Posted by: Dave | February 3, 2010 11:02 AM
Been there done that--some listen others don't--like all youngsters--whether an extremist is the target or not several shots indicate thoughtless furore--blacks who have been victims of such law enforcement tsunami force have sued in the past--multiple shots, handcuffing a dead man, not necessary--law enforcement is not god--police brutality and police impetuosity are realities that cannot and must not be condoned--the same aim can be achieved without sinking to the level of the enemy and finally sinking to the level of the enemy simply bolsters the enemy's cause. Also I don't grieve for this guy--I grieve for the general inhumanity from both sides and the seeming intractability of the problem when communication is possible only through the barrel of a gun--suspicion and hatred being the main causes for such a breakdown between two groups of people it is time to grieve.
Ravensfan Anon
Posted by: Anonymous | February 3, 2010 1:21 PM