9/11 museum to include hijacker perspective
The National Sept. 11 Memorial & Museum in New York will display quotations from the hijackers alongside comments from survivors of the deadliest terror attack ever on U.S. soil, Reuters is reporting.
Museum officials on Thursday announced details of the museum, which is expected to open on the World Trade Center site by 2013.
As Reuters notes, previous attempts to present the motivation of the 19 men who hijacked four airliners on Sept. 11, 2001, to crash into prominent buildings have run into emotional opposition from family members and others, and led politicians to cancel earlier plans for an “International Freedom Center” on the site.
But Museum President Joe Daniels told reporters the exhibit would present the facts, focusing on "what happened on that day, why it happened, what does it mean to live in a 9/11 world."
"Let the perpetrators speak for themselves," Reuters quotes Daniels as saying. "That's a powerful and important thing that visitors to this museum need to hear -- bearing witness to the actual testimonials of those who committed the atrocities.”
"No one will come to this museum and leave with a feeling of heroism for the people who committed the crimes that we bear witness to today," he added.






Comments
No one will leave with a feeling of heroism for what the hijackers did? I disagree. Many Muslims have already stated that the hijackers were heroes. I find it hard to believe that none of them will visit the museum.
Posted by: Clay | September 11, 2009 12:57 PM
Will they appear under a section "Reasons For Terrorism", "Excuses For Terrorism" or "Why We Hate America?"
Place them in a dark corner somewhere in the basement of the memorial.
Posted by: Mark | September 11, 2009 1:28 PM
We cannot take the hijackers out of 9/11 anymore than we can take Hitler out of discussions of World War II. History is made up of facts, and you need to present ALL of the facts of a period of history in order to truly understand it. Bravo to the 9/11 memorial for living up to its responsibilities to make sure that every piece of that day is remembered, not just the pieces we want to remember.
Posted by: Jennifer | September 14, 2009 11:09 AM
What! A 9/11 memorial without the perspective, motivations and life stories of the hijackers who perpetrated the catastrophe? Unthinkable and I am sure glad that planners and presenters didn't succumb to pressure from affected relatives who speak more from their emotion than from their intellect . Imagine an exhibit minus anything about the hijackers, 50 years from now. How would it enlighten the visitors as to what happened on 9/11? Why would the visitors even want to come if the causes of the mayhem are hidden from view, if the story is incomplete, if the exhibit is sanitized and if they have to hunt elsewhere to know the men who committed the atrocity? We are not here to varnish the truth. Each generation must bear witness to the generations that come after. These were mortals who did to us what they did. They hated us and were blinded by this hate. Mighty nations too have to tremble before human hate. There is life after you are victimized by hate, but the pain and the scars are deep, and the rejuvenation is slow. The 9/11 museum must speak to these facts from the perspectives of all involved--the perpetrators and the victims. Clay you need glasses for your soul. Of course the Muslims will go to this museum too. Several are productive citizens of the US. They will weep with the others and weep some more that the hijackers twisted Islam and made it a vehicle for hate. This is a world class museum-- it should be and only the whole truth will set us free.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 17, 2009 9:34 AM
Anon, please read what is above, please. Thanks.
Posted by: Clay | September 17, 2009 10:16 AM
"The devil comes but for one reason, to kill, to steal, and to destroy." Jesus Christ
This is the perspective that any sane person needs to be concerned about. Your enemy is an equal opportunity destroyer. He does not discriminate. If you refuse to participate in aggressively loving God and His truth, then you will be vulnerable to the psycopath who is your enemy. If it were not for God's restraint upon the activity of satan, there would be some variety of 9/11 everyday.
Jesus Christ is the safe haven, now and for eternity.
Posted by: chipsmydog | September 17, 2009 1:37 PM
Anonymous I find your lack of compassion for those who suffered losses during the 9/11 tragedy rather pathetic. If I didn’t know you better I’d say you had more compassion for the hijackers. Then again it's not out of character for you either. We both know you only went through that discourse to stir up people to post so you could read the responses. I guess that means I’m giving you what you want as well.
I agree that the museum needs to "present the facts, focusing on "what happened on that day, why it happened". To bad you couldn't something like that without mocking or insulting the victim’s families?
Posted by: ravensfan | September 17, 2009 3:56 PM
Jeez Ravensfan don't carry a grudge for the canonization comment--for all you know I may have lost some good friends and relatives on 9/11. I have plenty of compassion for them and I understand why they speak from emotion but I still believe that the presenters are doing the right thing. My post speaks for itself--I won't dignify your stupid search for sinister meanings further.
Posted by: Anonymous | September 17, 2009 5:42 PM
Now who is "chipsmydog"? I am glad to have some more support. Thanks. All I was saying above was that some Muslims will undoubtedly see the hijackers as heroes when I responded to Anonymous. I didnt say that all Muslims would. I dont need glasses for my soul. If not all Muslims are terrorists but over 90 percent of all terrorists are Muslim then maybe those Muslims who arent should encourage those who are to change. I dont hear anything coming out of Iran for terrorists to change. What I heard this morning was that an opposition leader was attacked at a rally.
Posted by: Clay | September 18, 2009 8:54 AM
Anonymous Saying that the victim’s families "speak more from their emotion than from their intellect." was completely uncalled for and did show a lack of compassion on your part. Your point could have easily been made without saying it.
It’s too bad that instead of simply saying you meant no lack of compassion you choose to belittle me for pointing it out.
Posted by: ravensfan | September 18, 2009 11:48 AM