How often are Baltimore school buildings closed?
In response to the questions last week about how often city schools have to close because of malfunctioning boilers and other building problems: From last summer through Friday, the system reports, 34 schools -- about 17 percent of those in the city -- had to be shut down at least once. The closings occurred on 23 days -- in other words, some days saw multiple school closures. That averages out to around once a week that a building has to close. But the closings tend to happen in spurts, either because of ongoing problems at a building (a la Poly/Western) or because multiple problems occur during a week with extreme temperatures.
Since this is a topic that so many of you in the schools feel so passionately about, I thought I'd also offer a little perspective on what the system's facilities department is up against in trying to keep the heat running across the city.
For decades until a few years ago, the school district did little preventative maintenance on its buildings. Those years of neglect are showing now in the form of all the boiler failures, inoperative windows, etc.
The school system must rely on the state for most of its capital dollars. The state never has nearly enough money to go around, but what money it has must be spread among Maryland's 24 school districts, even though Baltimore has the oldest buildings that require the most repairs. (We learned Friday of the federal stimulus money that will go to the school system's operating budget, but I haven't heard yet whether any of the governor's discretionary funds will go to school renovations.)
The state requires that a school be more than 60 percent utilized -- currently and projected for seven years into the future -- to be eligible for capital funds. This is a big problem particularly for the city's high schools, where enrollment was declining for a long time until this year.
In response to the comments left here last week alleging that citywide schools get preferential treatment, officials in the facilities department insist that is not true. There simply is not enough money to meet all the needs, and in the case of the under-enrolled schools, to a large extent their hands are tied. And when a building has temperature problems, they anger people no matter what they do: If they close, it's lost learning time; stay open, it's inappropriate learning conditions.
I don't envy their job.






Comments
I know that schools are closed and, for the most part, I think that facilities does a good job with the money and manpower that they have. Unfortunately, BCPSS is blessed/cursed with historic buildings and neither the money nor the political will to replace them. I have worked in other systems that had newer buildings and they have problems also--just different ones. For a large number of our schools, it would be much cheaper to tear them down and start from scratch than to completely repair what needs to be taken care of. Sadly, that will not happen as people are tied to the historic in Baltimore. Can you imagine tearing down City or Douglass or Booker T? I don't think so; people would scream. So we are stuck with aging buildings and their attendant problems.
Posted by: vetern teacher | February 24, 2009 6:46 AM
After 7 school days of a freezing room, shuttling my classes around the building trying to find warm teaching space (with or without a chalkboard, materials, an appropriate place for students to write, etc.), I'm beginning to feel more like a middle school babysitter than a teacher. And a cold one, at that.
Frankly, I don't care what kinds of funding problems they're having. Is North Ave. managing to stay warm?
Posted by: wishing for warmth | February 24, 2009 7:42 AM
Hah! I'd say North Avenue has been plenty warm over the past year as Dr. Alonso has lit many fires.
Posted by: VoiceForSchoolTruth | February 24, 2009 9:44 AM
Every time I drive by the old Eastern High School Building on 33rd Street, I wonder why the same could not be done at City, Douglas, Poly/Western, Booker T and so many smaller neighborhood elementary schools.
Posted by: OverTheTop | February 24, 2009 12:07 PM
it all comes down the the usage requirement that Liz spoke of.
To qualify for Captial renovation dollars schools need to be at a minimum 60% capacity.
This is very difficult for many urban districts that are competing with a greater number of parochial, charter and private schools than say in the counties.
These buildings are very old and in some cases should be torn down, but then comes the question of where to build another one? In the counties there is more open space to build anew on, the more dense the population the harder it is to find adequate space.
Moreover, do you build a smaller school or do you plan for population increases?
These are hard questions for all urban districts to answer.
Posted by: Poly Teacher | February 24, 2009 2:27 PM
Just to clarify...
just because only 34 schools closed, doesn't mean that only 34 schools SHOULD have closed. My school had no heat on multiple occasions, smoking heaters and burst pipes on other occasions, and only closed once. It seems that only the high profile schools (or else once where the admin/parents are willing to really speak up) get closed.
I've been told that "we're waiting to hear from north avenue" every time our school should have closed, only to find out that no one was giving us a real answer, meaning the infamous "we'll see", that our parents used to give - aka, no way.
I hope that Dr. Alonso finds out about this. So many people (myself included) are tired of being ignored that we've stopped speaking up altogether.
Posted by: city teacher | February 24, 2009 7:19 PM
I'm curious to see how many schools have the opposite problem.
My school is easily 90 degrees in some classrooms and averages around 85 for the whole building. Our windows are welded shut, so there's no relief. Some of us have bought fans for our classrooms, but it's hard to teach over the whir of 3-5 fans.
I know this isn't catch-pneumonia-and-die worthy, but man is everybody crabby.
Posted by: Steph | February 24, 2009 9:34 PM
I recall a school system that worked with incentives from the local energy company and from state and local government to retro fit/update the schools in the system.Heating systems,lighting, and window replacement was involved.The school system was assured that their investment would recouped in three years in energy bills savings. The investment was actually recouped after two years of energy bills. In addition to all the problems that have been discussed regarding the heat, I can only imagine the BG&E bills to the schools. While some schools may have taken individual steps to conserve energy, as a system I see no initiatives to be environmentally responsible while at the same time providing healthy air in the schools.I also worked in a Baltimore school with an average indoor winter temp of 86 degrees as measured by many indoor thermometers. It was truly miserable,expensive, and irresponsible.
Posted by: wise educator | February 24, 2009 10:33 PM
Many years ago I volunteered for BUILD and I walked away from that experience with a lot in my head, but one fact rang true. The thing Baltimore has more of than any other city is land. We have blocks, upon blocks, upon blocks of unused buildings (some residential, some not). On top of that unused land potential, didn't the city itself *sell* several school buildings? Those would have been some choice places to build new schools. I suppose zoning laws could poke holes in my theory, but come on... not enough room? With the amount of urban sprawl & urban blight in B'more... there's more than enough room.
Posted by: Brandon | February 25, 2009 7:09 AM
For those who may not know, Scroggins is one of those people who under basically impossible conditions is holding this system together with bandaids and duct tape. It would be no great loss if AAA disappeared tomorrow, but we'd be a much worse shape without Scroggins.
Posted by: North Ave Insider | February 26, 2009 1:41 AM