baltimoresun.com

« CDC study shows school murders down from 90s | Main | Suspensions in Maryland »

What the BCPSS bosses make

As everyone following developments in the Baltimore school system knows, there have been several high-profile administrative appointments lately (in addition to departures). In the hours immediately after many of these appointment announcements, as I've scrambled to compile a story on deadline, I've been unable to find out how much money the administrators will make in their new jobs. So a few weeks ago, I filed a request with the school system for the salaries I've not yet reported. I have them in hand now and will list them below, for the record.

And for the record, I'm not making a judgment one way or the other about whether these people are overpaid (that, dear readers, is for you to debate). On one hand, the school system is facing a $50 million budget shortfall for next year. On the other, Dr. Alonso needs to be surrounded by good people if he's going to have a chance of succeeding at reform, and top tier administrators in surrounding districts make comparably high salaries. Keep in mind also that a lot of administrative positions are being eliminated at the same time as the promotions and new hires.

Without further adue...

Gen. Bennie E. Williams, chief of staff to Andres Alonso: $168,945
Mary Minter, chief academic officer: $168,945
JoAnne Koehler, human resources officer: $168,945
Michael Sarbanes, executive director of partnerships, communications and community engagement (starting Feb. 19): $140,000
Irma Johnson, executive director of elementary and elementary/middle schools: $140,000
Roger Shaw, executive director of secondary schools: $140,000

Posted by Sara Neufeld at 6:02 AM | | Comments (3)
Categories: Baltimore City
        

Comments

Their value is only as good as their results. The question I suppose is whether or not we're getting a million dollars' worth of positive outcome (or at least on track for it).

This only makes sense if you are able to compare them to their predecessors. Two of these are new positions but I guess there is an overall cost savings with the "retiring
" of the AAOs.

Compared to US median income ranges, these seem very high. However, looking at the individuals' qualifications, their salaries could be significantly higher in the private sector. Alonso, a double Harvard graduate alum... Sarbanes, an NYU law alum and former executive director of a substantial non-profit... these resumes could afford to draw a much higher salary elsewhere. I mentioned it before, but a 1st year out of law school has the potential to make upwards of $200,000 with bonuses that very first year. Consultants and ibankers can range even higher (not including recent downturns in the economy). I think these salaries are more than fair and are likely too low to be competitive - there is clearly something more than salary at work to keep them invested.

Also, if 1 $140,000 employee replaces 4 $90,000 employees, there's still a SAVINGS of $200,000 a year. I'm very ok with that formula.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please enter the letter "k" in the field below:
About the bloggers
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Education news • InsideEd's glossary of education jargon

Spread the word about InsideEd
Blog updates
Recent updates to baltimoresun.com news blogs
 Subscribe to this feed