Are schools safe?
Today’s article headlined "2 Teens Held on Bomb Charge" again raised questions about what school officials are doing to ensure students are safe in the schoolhouse. While no explosives were found at Sudbrook Magnet Middle School yesterday, police said the two girls who were eventually arrested told investigators they had tried without success to set off a homemade bomb about two weeks ago at the Pikesville-area school.
Anxious parents — who rushed to the school after word filtered out through a voicemail message from the principal distributed on the school system’s mass-messaging service — understandably had many questions as they scanned the crowd of evacuated students for their children. They wondered why the girls were allowed back in the school after the previous incident and what school officials were doing to make sure children and staff members are safe at Sudbrook.
Baltimore County school officials have a safety plan that includes specific duties for staff members during emergencies such as yesterday’s incident at Sudbrook.
Do you think school officials are doing enough to keep schools safe? What would you like to see them do differently? Are you worried that schools are becoming less safe? Do you think school officials do a good enough job of communicating with parents, students and the community when incidents like this occur?
In addition to hearing your thoughts today, we invite you to check out Monday’s "Education Q&A," which will take up the issue of school safety.
Categories: School Safety (Or Lack Thereof)


Comments
Schools were once thought to be the safest place you could send your kids. Nowadays, you have to worry about shootings, bomb threats, etc.
Frankly, you can't fault schools or the administration whether or not they are safe enough. It's about time we hold these children responsible for these actions rather than a simple slap on the wrist and releasing them back to their parents. I commend the teacher who was able to intercept the note and thankfully no one was hurt. But, these days, it seems like the only time things get churning is when a child gets hurt or killed. It's all the buzz until the next school shooting or bomb threat. When are we as a society going to wake up? It's only been a few weeks since the VT tragedy but the buzz is over with. Now we'll focus on these two girls until the next shooting or threat. Same cycle, no solution.
Posted by: Nazma Khan-Edwards | May 4, 2007 10:50 PM
A question to be asked is about the law that limits the school systems from suspending students who are identified with a disability. Often, this is the reason students are allowed back to school, or not suspended. School's can't discuss it because its a matter of confidential information. When the community discusses it they they are sexist, racist, elitist or some other bad thing.
Schools often cannot operate with common sense because of the rules they must play under. All school systems work very hard to maintain safety, I truly do believe it is priority one in the schools I interact with.
Posted by: Chris | May 5, 2007 11:45 AM
I completely agree with Chris' comment. Not only can schools not suspend students if their behavior is related to their disability, but schools are punished if they have high suspension rates. Under no child left behind, schools with high suspension rates do not make adequate yearly progress (AYP) which over a period of time can result in the state taking over their school. As a result, school administrations at times are not able to suspend students because of the fear that they will be labeled persistently dangerous. In fact at a school that my friend teaches at she was told that there will be no more suspensions for the rest of the school year. Instead of looking negatively on schools that are trying to hold students accountable for their bad behavior, we should look negatively on our politicians that pass these ridiculous laws!
Posted by: Danielle | May 8, 2007 8:57 PM
My research shows that school based mental health services improve the mental health, behavior, and commitment to school, while reducing disciplinary referrals and suspensions among "at risk" youth. We can identify youth needing help and give them services before it gets to the critical stage.
Posted by: Dr. Kathryn Seifert | June 5, 2007 9:32 PM