baltimoresun.com

« Guilford victim speaks out | Main | Testimony continues in Gerard Mungo civil trial »

January 19, 2010

Cell phones in prison could become felony

Gary D. Maynard, the secretary of Maryland's Public Safety and Correctional Services, is testifying in Annapolis today on a bill to turn having a cell phone in a prison into a felony worth up to five years more behind bars. At the moment, it's only a misdemeanor.

The issue has been a priority especially since the Carl Lackl case which a man behind prison walls was able to put a successful hit on a witness while using a pilfered cell phone. Since then, authorities have stepped up their fight against smuggled phones and there are attempts to change the law to allow police to block cell phone signals at prisons.

Last year, officials confiscated more than 1,600 cell phones from prisons across the state. Maynard is appearing before the House Judiciary Committee. Here is his testimony:

HB 78 - Criminal Law - Contraband - Telecommunication Devices – Penalties
House Judiciary 1/19/10 at 1:00 pm

Mr. Chairman and members of the Committee.  I am here today to support HB 78, a bill that will enhance the penalties for individuals smuggling cell phones into our correctional facilities. 

I have been involved in corrections for 39 years, working at the Federal Bureau of Prisons and in five states, serving in four of those as head of the corrections system. 

For those of us in this field, one of the most important functions is the security of our prisons and the overall safety, not only of the institution and the people inside, but of the community at large.  
 
One of the leading contributors to criminal behavior within our prisons has been gang activity.  Often times, these individuals seek out ways to continue to operate their criminal activity from prison – most often through the use of cell phones.    The introduction of cell phones within our prisons is growing at an alarming rate.

Phones can be brought into prisons in a variety of ways.  They are smuggled on or within an inmate’s body, by compromised staff, by visitors, tossed over the fences or walls, concealed within deliveries or shipments of food and supplies, or through contractors. 

Two years ago, a detainee who was housed within our Division of Pretrial Detention and Services was convicted of ordering the death of a young man in Baltimore.  He made the call from a smuggled cell phone within our facility. 

Victims and public officials are being threatened, harassed, and even killed by prisoners with access to cell phones across this country. 


Over the past 3 years, the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services has recovered over 3,600 phones in our institutions.    This is a result of a combination of enhanced security processes and the implementation of technology.  We have strengthened our screening process investing in Secure View Scanners, BOSS chairs, and X-Ray machines. We have developed stronger protocols for staff screening at entrance and have invested in a K-9 unit to detect phones. 

We have also looked to cell phone jamming, detection, and interference technologies to assist our security units. We hosted a demonstration in September, which received national attention to see how detection and interference technologies could assist our efforts. This past December, we followed up with another demonstration, piloting cell phone detection technology in three active prison facilities.  

We know this is not enough. We need to be able to more effectively punish those individuals who seek to circumvent the law and give these inmates the ability to communicate with the outside world and continue their criminal behavior. We can not allow another murder, or give them to ability to plan escapes or institutional violence any more. 


Under the current law, an individual caught smuggling a cell phone, or in possession of an unauthorized cell phone in our prisons is subject to a misdemeanor charge and up to three years imprisonment. 

This is just not a strong enough deterrent. We need to treat this as the serious crime that it is.  It is should be a felony like it is in other states like Florida and New Jersey who recently passed similar legislation to HB 78.

The passage of this bill, in addition to our enhanced security protocols will give us the tools necessary to continue to protect the public’s safety, as well as our staff members, and the offenders and detainees under our supervision. 

The panel here today will be able to speak directly to the security threats that cell phones present in our prisons, and the need for passage of HB 78.  We would appreciate your consideration of this important bill. 

Thank you.

Here is the bill:

hb0078f
Posted by Peter Hermann at 1:00 PM | | Comments (9)
Categories: Prisons
        

Comments

So if it is a felony with up to 5 years added and they receive a PBJ, doesn't that mean work-release . . . Still trying to understand the Maryland Courts and law makers

This bill won't fix the problem. You can't phase people doing hard time with more time. The real solution is for Congress and the FCC to permit jamming of phones within prisons.

I think that the fine should be in the range of at least 10k and the on ly problem is that we have to rely on the judges to carry it out. Remember, the people in the community are the ones who are bringing in the contraband and they are the ones risking their freedom. If you are in custody and serving a short sentence then you will not want to expand that sentence with an additional five (5) years

There is no true justice in are courts. It is all about there bills and laws and how much money that can be made for there laws and bills. I say let us the people set forth some laws of are own that the courts need to follow. We will set the bills with out pay. I see no reason why the inmates should not have cell phone's or could it be there's no money in it for the prisons because isn't this the reason for all unfairness. Greed.

I totally agree with Josh. A little extra prison time will scare no one. You also can't expect the guards to find all the cell phones while some are prob. paid off to look the other way. Jamming is the only way we can be certain their cell phones aren't working. This bill is useless.

Anonymous: you see no reason why inmates shouldn't have cell phones? Are you kidding me? How about so they can't call hits on the innocent witnesses who plan to testify against them? (Which happened as recently as last year I believe). Or running crominal enterprises from the inside, which basically negates the whole point of locking them up in the first place.

Imagine you see a crime from across the street, and months later are called to testify as to what you saw. Except the guy who was arrested calls his buddy on the outside to "take care" of you, so he can get off scott free.

Really? You don't see a problem there?

Wow Anonymous stupidty leak stupidty leak is what going on with you , so you see no problem with inmates having cell phones, ok how about inmates with firearms how does that sit with you , they losted those privilages when they got arrested and convicted and sentence to prison for however long the sentence was , so I think your way off on this one , that is of course until you become a victim yourself , there you will have a 180 degree turn about for sure.

Interesting Mr. Maynard. Better tell your wardens and case management types as well as SOME of your disciplinary hearing officers to have the courage to give tough sanctions and when given to uphold the administrative sanctions when good time is taken and long segragation is given. Your get tough message to the legislators sounds good and glad you are doing something other then trying to start horse farms for inmates and creating more phony assistant commissioner positons to insulate yourself-hmm outdoor services commissioner, that was a good one LOL, so with this bill if passed you can justify another year of doing nothing but collecting your triple dipping salary.

The United States has the highest incarceration rate in the world. And all those people are not murderers and rapists. There are quite a few who are white collar crime, young people making one too many a mistake, using drugs or being the pawn used by drug dealers; I can go on and on. These people are being constantly threatened to be moved up to higher security if they step out of line. And, lets be honest they are usually people without money for a good lawyer.I have also read of wrongful convictions from time to time. I do agree that inmates should not have cell phones - but I also believe that inmates are kept isolated and are at the mercy of other inmates, rogue guards etc. Just think for a second how did we get the footage of some of the riots? Smart phones I think. I for one believe that just because you are put behind bars does not entitle others to do with you what they want. For quite a few of these people the punishment does not fit the crime and I believe 5 years for having a cell phone is just another example of government stripping the American people of their life. Prison is big business people.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Peter Hermann
Peter Hermann started covering news for The Baltimore Sun in 1990, first in Anne Arundel County and, starting in 1994, reporting on the Baltimore Police Department. In 2001, he was assigned to Jerusalem as the Baltimore Sun's Middle East correspondent. He returned in 2005 as an assistant city editor overseeing crime coverage. In 2008, Peter returned to the beat as a daily reporter and blogger. A recent BBC report featured him in a segment on the harsh realities of covering crime in Baltimore.

Coverage will focus on crime trends, problems in neighborhoods in the city and elsewhere, profiles of victims and police officers and try to offer readers a fresh perspective on one of the most vexing issues facing Baltimore and its future.



Contributing to this blog is Justin Fenton, who joined The Sun in 2005 and has covered the Baltimore City Police Department and the criminal justice system since 2008. His work includes an investigation into Cal Ripken Jr.’s minor league baseball stadium deal with his hometown of Aberdeen, a three-part series chronicling a ruthless con woman, coverage of the killing of five Amish children at a schoolhouse in Nickel Mines, Pa., and a job swap with a British crime reporter to explore differences in crime-fighting. A special report looking into how city police handle rape cases led to sweeping reforms that changed the way sexual assaults are investigated in Baltimore. He was recognized as the best reporter in Baltimore by the City Paper in 2010 and by Baltimore Magazine in 2011.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

In the news

Sign up for FREE local news alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for local news text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Breaking News newsletter
When a big news event breaks, we'll e-mail you the basics with links to up-to-date details.
Sign up

Charm City Current
Stay connected