When $44 million isn't $44 million
If you saw Albert Mosley's $44 million award in a civil lawsuit against a police officer who he says paralyzed him in 2006, you probably thought that was a pretty big payday.
Collecting it is a whole other matter.
As The Sun's Annie Linskey reports today, it's commonplace for the city and the plaintiff to work out a settlement once the jury award is set. It's simply unrealistic, officials say, for the cash-strapped city to pay $44 million to an individual. Mosley's payment was first reduced to $19 million by a judge, and the city has agreed to pay $2 million after garnishing the detective's wages for a year. Two million is still a large chunk of change, but this is a reality check for those who think they're going to walk out of court with whatever the jury awards.
Categories: Courts and the justice system




Comments
Maybe, that's why we have vigilantes.
Posted by: Titi | December 28, 2009 6:25 PM
Two million dollars is nothing. I know a man, he has since died, who was awarded a few million for being parylized while in police custody. After the lawyers and doctors and medical care was paid, he had nothing. There was no big payday.
Posted by: Vanessa Graham | December 29, 2009 1:56 PM