Decriminalize prostitution?
Back in 1996, the Baltimore Police Department dressed Officer Lori Marketti in seductive clothes and put her out on Calvert Street. Her job was to catch men looking for prostitutes. Not only was she attractive, she wasn't worn by shooting heroin or living on the streets.
She was, therefore, a prized catch -- I would argue entrapment. Brake lights went on. One man solicited her from the driver's seat of an armored truck, creating quite a problem for police about how to impound the money with the driver being hauled off to jail!
Police have been doing these stings for years -- targeting both the women who sell themselves and men looking to buy their services. In some neighbhorhoods, the problem is so bad that women get solicited when they step out the doors of their rowhouses. In Pigtown, a vigilante group takes pictures and video of hookups and posts them on the Internet, complete with license plate numbers of cars.
In 1997, I was in the Southern District station when police brought in both prostitutes and johns who had been arrested in a sting operation on Patapsco Avenue (still one of the city's biggest problem areas for the trade). I overheard this wonderful comment from one of the women, to a man who invoked his right to remain silent:
"If you wouldn't proposition us, none us us would be here."
City police for years debated whether to target men, or women, or both. The women are easy targets; the men are more difficult, and require dangerous stings with undercover officers such as Marketti. But women viewed the arrests as simply the cost of doing business. Going after the men, police thought, would disrupt their lives, end their marriages and sometimes cost them their jobs, and it would have a greater impact. Former Mayor Kurt L. Schmoke wanted to publish the names and photos of every man convicted of prostitution, but gave up on the idea when he discovered that so few men who were arrested were actually found guilty that it was useless. In six months, the entire list consisted only two names.
Over the weekend, Julie Bykowicz wrote a story about the bust of a suspected brothel in Butcher's Hill, in a home in the middle of nice neighborhood near Patterson Park. Most arrests are of prostitutes working the streets. Who knows how many work inside, where they are less likely to be noticed (of course, men lining upside a house on a residential street certainly draws suspicion)?
In San Francisco, voters on Nov. 4 will face a question about whether to decriminalize prostitution. The city's main newspaper, the San Francisco Chronicle, is urging residents to vote yes on Proposition K, arguing it will reduce violence and help prostitutes and their customers seek and get proper health care. The debate continues as to whether that means the streets will be flooded with more street-walkers, or if the street-walkers will simply be more organized and free from pimps.
In the 1980s, Baltimore got national attention merely proposing a DEBATE on drug decriminalization; I couldn't find any information about whether that also included prostitution. I checked with Ryan O'Doherty, the spokesman for City Council President Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, and he assured me that the issue isn't being discussed now either.
"It's not in our plans," he said.
It's still an interesting topic ...








Comments
You can not just decriminalize something with no plan to regulate it. If your going to decriminalize you better set up a system like Vegas or your going to end up with a major public health crisis on your hand. I'd rather see marajuana legalized before prostitution at least we won't be promoting aids and other stds
Posted by: j | October 27, 2008 1:21 PM