Rails to Trails VP on Purple Line
In a post about this morning's e-mailed trail advocacy, I pondered the Rails to Trails Conservancy's position on Montgomery County's proposed Purple Line, which would run alongside the Capital Crescent Trail. Here is a reply I received from Jeffrey Ciabotti, the conservancy's vice president of trail development:
The portion of the Purple Line being converted to transit and trail use is on railbanked corridor. That is, unused rail corridor that has been preserved for future transportation purposes but in the interim can be used as a public trail. The popularity of the Capital Crescent Trail (and its future connection to the Metropolitan Branch Trail) and the necessity for increased public transportation has resulted in a plan to incorporate both uses on the corridor. There are many such successful examples of rails-with-trails across the country. With good design emphasizing safety and plenty of public input this project can be among the best in the nation.
I'd say that's a fairly detailed response. It sort of makes me wonder about the potential for some sort of simple walking path along Baltimore's light rail line, between BWI and the planned Gwynns Falls / Jones Falls trail link.
Edit: Trail photo added July 5.
Recent tweets from @patrickmaynard:
Follow @patrickmaynard on twitter>>









Comments
I think such a trail is unnecessary. The Jones Falls Trail is very close and parallels the route. It would essentially be superflous at least throughout the City. Add to fact that certain parts would need to be graded and properly lit. Then the necessity for some form of security or police presence along that stretch while are resources are already stretched. Then the increased likelyhood of jaywalking the rails and collisions. The City can't even afford to maintain (or built) its parks facilities in the first place. So simply because something can be done, doesn't necessarily lend itself to a good idea. Each scenario is different. (Not to mention that the right-of-way doesn't really exist along enough parts to connect it properly.)
Posted by: Nate | June 8, 2011 6:10 PM
Let me backpedal a bit, now that realize you were referring to the southern section. So the first point doesn't apply, naturally, but the latter points are still mostly relevant.
Posted by: Nate | June 8, 2011 6:12 PM
Unfortunately, the part of the Purple Line that is proposed for the Georgetown Branch of the Capital Crescent Trail will be too wide to accommodate the trail (viz. tthe plan to run the trail above the trains in the tunnel that goes under Wisconsin Avenue--under the Air Rights building). The rail line also necessitates cutting down hundreds of trees to accommodate the overhead catenary lines, which would eliminate any shade along the trail abutting Town of Chevy Chase and several other towns. It would effectively destroy that part of the trail.
Posted by: Veda Charrow | June 10, 2011 1:06 PM
Trees must be removed for construction of the Purple Line, but that does not equate to permanent loss of all shade on all parts of the corridor. Small trees can quickly be established near the trail to provide shade without interfering with overhead catenery lines - there are numerous places around the world where this is done. See http://www.purplelinenow.com/rail_trail_is_green.html for examples.
Posted by: Wayne Phyillaier | June 11, 2011 1:36 AM