2011 National Marathon preview
When the Suntrust National Marathon starts at 7 a.m. Saturday, Lisa Reichmann will already have been up for about 3 hours.
For the top Maryland woman at last spring's event, that won't be a huge change. "I wake up every morning at 4:15," says Reichmann, a former attorney who's now a full-time parent for three young children.
She will go to pick up a friend at 4:30, then drive southeast from Gaithersburg to the area near RFK stadium, where she'll join more than 15,000 people in the combined marathon, half-marathon and team relay.
Bigger than before
That registration number -- 16,490 runners, as of March 21 -- is a significant bump from the 12,000 entries the event attracted last year, continuing a general pattern of growth since the first race in 2006.
Organizers want that to continue.
"We would like to grow this race in a smart and safe manner," wrote Jennifer Schiller of the Greater Washington Sports Alliance in a Wednesday e-mail.
"Our goal for next year will be 20,000 runners."
That would put the race within striking distance of its fall competitors, the Marine Corps Marathon and the Baltimore Running Festival, which hosted 30,000 and 22,000 participants last year, respectively.
The Baltimore event, however, maintains substantially larger prize purses than the other two, and the races' times reflect that: Last year's winning Baltimore time of 2:13:11, run by David Rutoh, was more than five minutes faster than either of the Washington races' recent winners.
Flat course
If low prize money is to blame for slightly slower winning times, the course itself is not, and that bodes well for the all-amateur crowd that Suntrust attracts. While there's a relatively steady uphill climb before mile 7, organizers are touting the flat topography of the nation's capital, calling this weekend's flagship race the fastest looped, Boston-qualifying course in the country.
Racers form a rough figure-eight, going clockwise through the city's Northwest portion, then dropping off the half-marathoners near the start before taking a brief, counter-clockwise run along the Anacostia River.
The course shifts a bit from year to year, but the only major changes took place in year two, according to Schiller. That's when organizers moved to a route that snaked entirely within the limits of Washington, DC.
One other fairly reliable factor on the course has been Michael Wardian, an Arlington resident who has won four of the last five years. Wardian, a national 50k champion, has an international reputation for taking on a packed schedule of races.
For example, at a time when many runners would be tapering, Wardian took on international competitors in late February at the Colonial Half-Marathon in Virginia, finishing third.
Reichmann, of Maryland, is no slouch herself: At age 36, she's on marathon number 16, and her kids are starting to get into the act.
""They run several races -- little toddler trot races," she says.
"They have several ribbons and trophies up in their rooms."
If you know someone who's running and you're trying to stake out a spot to watch, I suggest bringing a blanket. (One of our commenters has some advice on good viewing places too.)
Recent National Marathon posts:
Recent tweets from @patrickmaynard:
Follow @patrickmaynard on twitter>>
Categories: National Marathon, Running, Washington, Weekend




Comments
I'll be running the National Marathon for the first time on Saturday, although I won't be competitive with anyone but myself (I''m hoping to break 5 hours).
I'm most bummed that the Metro won't be opening until 6 this year,so I'll have to take a cab from my hotel to the race start.
Posted by: Hal Laurent | March 24, 2011 8:57 PM
I ran the National half the first time in 2008. Michael Wardian won the marathon that Saturday morning, then hopped on a plane for Tennessee to run the Knoxville Marathon on Sunday, where I believe he placed third. In addition to being a 50K champ he also at one time held the record for fastest marathon time on a treadmill and the fastest marathon time while pushing a stroller. The guy's a freak!
Posted by: brstevens | March 25, 2011 7:57 PM
I question the characterization of the course as being relatively flat except for the ascent to mile 7. There were several longish upgrades in addition to that one, in particular the cruel trip up Minnesota Avenue on miles 24 and 25. I personally thought the course felt harder than Baltimore, although that may be just because it caught me by surpise. I also thought Baltimore was harder the first year I did it then the second.
I also don't think the race is run as well as the Corrigan Sports races. Mile markers were almost totally absent in the first half, although there were more of them in the second half. And in the second half there were stretches in less populated areas where it wasn't always clear where the course was, and there were no volunteers at the turns.
Posted by: Hal Laurent | March 27, 2011 2:54 PM
Wow 4500 more participants than last year.
Its no surprise that there are 625 marathons nationwide and growing each year.
Great article and I hope to run this one soon.
Gotta Run
Mike
www.WhyMarathon.com
Posted by: Mike | March 28, 2011 8:29 PM