baltimoresun.com

« Katz dog loves ram | Main | Bites down, claims up »

June 29, 2008

More foreclosures = more euthanasia

The rising number of home foreclosures is leading to more dogs, cats and other pets being surrendered to animal shelters.

And with the exception of places like Furrytale Farm, a no-kill shelter outside Seattle -- featured in this NBC Nightly News report -- that generally means an increase in the number of animals being euthanized.

Animal shelters across the country are filling up to the point where that grim reality is the only option. And no-kill shelters are having a harder time finding room for animals brought to them. Furrytale, for instance, says it is having to turn away three of every four animals.

As NBC reporter Chris Jansing points out, the numbers are bleak: 261,000 homes in foreclosure in May alone; Los Angeles city shelters report a 30 percent increase in admissions.

Posted by John Woestendiek at 8:22 AM | | Comments (7)
        

Comments

I'm guessing that most "Mutts" readers would live on the street with their animals before they'd surrender a dog or cat to a shelter.

I saw this report on the news the other night and it literally brought tears to my eyes. I think this is the worst tragedy in animal welfare since Hurricane Katrina. Yet unlike Katrina, it's much more of a silent killer because at least for Katrina there were nationwide efforts to help the abandoned animals. I wish there was a way to help good families keep their pets so it doesn't come down to this. I can't imagine how horrible they must feel - to not only lose your home, but also lose your best friend.

Before you drop any animal off at a "private" shelter please do your homework. Contact local police depts. and other branches of law enforcement to check on the background of the people who run them. Also check with animal control. In many states there have been a number of questionable individuals claiming to be rescues that have had some serious questions of care and fraud raised.
It would be a good practice for news reporters to follow as well.

Mary-

I would. Luckily I have pet-friendly family that would take both of us in :)

People shouldn't have to give the dogs up, either. We have started promoting a sort of half-baked idea that it's "harmful" to the dog if the human has a reversal of fortune. We've completely lost track of the idea that for thousands of years, dogs have stood by their humans through bad times and good. It's part of what endears them to us. Good dogs have shared the company of kings and beggars, and we should never lose sight of that. I'm going to try to post a link. I don't know who the photographer is, so I can't give an attribution. But see if you can look at this photo and remain unaffected by it. Could you take that dog away from that man?

Carey--

Me too. Amie will never return to the shelter. I get sad just thinking about the two weeks she spent there before I adopted her.

I am also very wealthy--real wealth--since I have family and friends who love me and my dog and would help us in an emergency. I wish everyone were so lucky.

I wonder if there are some pet-loving entrepreneurs out there who could provide long-term boarding for the pets of people who have lost their homes? I really would live in my car or on the street before I'd take Amie to a shelter, but I know I couldn't do that if I had children to care for. There are horrible dilemmas for people in this economy. Still, I think it would be a better example for children if parents sold everything to be able to keep the family pet or lived in a less-desirable rental for the same reason. I've always thought that families who treated pets like disposable objects were providing terrible examples to children. (If the kids are inconvenient, do they get dumped somewhere?)

Again, Amie and I are lucky to live around people who consider dogs a part of the family.

Great photograph, Anne.

Sort of related: A while back, the Meals on Wheels program in my city was asking for pet food donations since volunteer drivers observed that elderly customers were sharing their small meals with their pets. I was impressed that the Meals on Wheels Program held the right attitude about the pets. I can't think of anyone who needs a pet more than someone with limited access to the outside world, or, in the case of the man in the photograph, with limited access to the warmth of the world.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "h" in the field below:
About Jill Rosen
Jill Rosen is a reporter at The Baltimore Sun. During her nearly 20 years in journalism, she has covered news and features — including a surprising number of stories that involved animals. There were the dog Christmas carolers in State College, Pa. There were the hounds who toured with a production of Chitty Chitty Bang Bang. The story of a preschool teacher at Baltimore’s Father Kolbe School who had to replace her class guinea pig, who died over the winter holiday. A harrowing tale of what it was like to make homemade pet food ...

Though her clean freak of a mother refused to allow her to get a dog, she has had a number of pets through the years, including goldfish named Bob and Fingle, a betta fish named Ichabod, a wild rat terrier named Wendel, who she shared with a roommate, and, currently, sweet, sweet kitties named Leo Sesame and Milo Pumpkin and a little rescued pup named Teddy Bean. She, Leo, Pumpkin and Teddy Bean live in Baltimore.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Your pet photos

More animal photos
Most Recent Comments
Stay connected