« Poofing up a Pomeranian | Main | Dizzy the dog does Delaware »

Track owners fight greyhound racing vote

While backers of a statewide ban on dog racing in Massachusetts say they have enough signatures to put the issue before voters, a lawsuit filed by dog track operators could keep the matter off the November ballot, the Boston Globe reports.

The Committee to Protect Dogs said it submitted 45,000 signatures -- far more than the 11,099 needed -- to local election officials for certification Tuesday, a day before the deadline.

The proposed dog racing ban would shut down the state's two tracks, Raynham-Taunton Greyhound Park and Wonderland Greyhound Park in Revere, by Jan. 1, 2010.

But a lawsuit filed by attorneys for one of the track owners argues that the referendum, since it singles out the two tracks, rather than applying to the whole state, is unfit for a referendum. The Supreme Judicial Court took the matter under advisement after a hearing May 7.

In 2006, the same track onwer used a lawsuit to successfully block a similar ballot initiative. Animal rights activists were successful in getting a ban on the ballot in 2000, but it was narrowly defeated.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:

About this blog


John Woestendiek has been a features reporter at The Sun for six years. Previously he worked as a reporter, columnist, national correspondent and editor at four other newspapers, and received a Pulitzer Prize for investigative reporting in 1987 for his reporting on prisons and mental institutions for The Philadelphia Inquirer. Woestendiek lives in South Baltimore with his dog, Ace.
A big, sloppy face-licking welcome
E-mail John

Also See

Most Recent Comments

Powered by Movable Type 3.36
Hosted by LivingDot