City cancels dog park hearing
We interrupt this soap opera to bring you a special bulletin: A City Council hearing scheduled for tomorrow on "The Future of Dog Parks in Baltimore" has been canceled.
Council member Jim Kraft requested the meeting in hopes that it would lead to the Department of Recreation and Parks beginning work on a master plan for additional dog parks in the city. The city currently has only one place where dogs can legally roam off leash -- Canton Dog Park.
Kraft said the meeting was postponed at the request of Mayor Sheila Dixon. Asked why, he declined to elaborate.
Kraft, council member for the 1st District, which includes Canton, said he scheduled the meeting so that the city could begin work on an plan to add dog parks in an organized manner and provide some relief to Canton Dog Park, which he says is overburdened.
"The Canton Dog Park is overrun, so to speak, and there is a group of people interested in opening another one in Patterson Park. That put before us the question of why aren’t there more dog parks in the city," he said. (There is also a group working to establish a dog park in Latrobe Park in Locust Point.)
As it is now, groups can petition to establish a dog park, provided they pay for its construction and maintenance and get the necessary city and neighborhood approvals.
"We need to have a discussion about how many dog parks we should have around the city," Kraft said. "We have some huge parks where people could easily put a dog park on an acre two and it would barely be noticed."
Kraft said the hearing will likely be rescheduled for late June or July.
City hall sources say the cancellation of the hearing is related to possible personnel changes in the city's Department of Recreation and Parks and Dixon's desire to have those transitions complete before tackling a master plan for dog parks in Baltimore.
The department is now headed by Portia Harris, acting director, who has held the post since the department's previous acting director, Connie A. Brown, resigned in 2005.






Comments
Thanks for posting this. I remember being in a meeting with the city five years ago concerning the creation of dog parks. I was very excited, but I remember talking to someone else there who said that she was in a meeting like that five years before hand and it never happened. In fact, our former council person posted, five years ago, that he had been in dog park creation meetings numerous times during the 16 years when he represented our district: http://www.pattersondogpark.org/status.html
In addition, a council person told us that if you don't want to get something done, you create meetings! So, it looks as though we're right back where we started and will never, ever get out of our little vicious cycle.....oh well.
Posted by: ellen in butchers hill | May 2, 2008 9:08 AM
I'm VERY surprised that Baltimore can't solve a simple problem like this.
Patterson park is 155 acres !! and they can't find a couple of acres for dogowners ??
Cuckoo ! Cuckoo !!
I could solve this problem in
about 3 days all by myself.
What happens in Baltimore when there is a complicated problem to solve ?
What does this mean: "the 1 55-acre fo9tprint of the park known today" Casino is not spelled with a zero on the end
http://www.ci.baltimore.md.us/government/recnparks/popups/parks/patterson_park.htm
The parks department also needs to start proofreading their webpages.
Bill Zardus
ccdogpark@ yahoo.com
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Dogpark-National-News/
Posted by: Bill Z | May 3, 2008 12:03 PM
Worse yet, what is the meeting for? After all the work we have done trying to get a park by following the guidelines set out by the city, does this mean the rules will change once again? If so, that isn't fair especially when our group was not even informed of this!
Posted by: Mike W | May 5, 2008 1:58 PM