Pit bull ban proposed in Michigan
Another battle over breed-specific legislation is coming to a head – this one in a Detroit suburb, sparked by controversy over a dog who has hurt no one.
The city commission of Plymouth, Mich., (population 9,000) says it won’t take any action until at least March 17, the Detroit Free Press reported.
The center of the controversy is Gage, a 2-year-old, 72-pound “red nose pit bull,” who has not been accused of any vicious behavior.
But the family next door feels intimidated by the dog’s appearance. And 77 others have joined in signing a petition encouraging the city to ban pit bulls or develop a dangerous dog ordinance to ensure better control of the breed.
"How can you say all pit bulls are bad?" asked the dog’s owner, Kyle Kosmyna, 23, who said Gage has always been gentle with his children. "That's like saying all people are bad.”
Within the past six months, three people have been killed in dog attacks in southeast Michigan, including an infant. In those incidents, the dogs involved were not pit-bull types.
The petition asks that pit bulls be banned or properly secured. Another petition is circulating against banning pit bulls. To read the Detroit Free Press article, click here.

Comments
Wow, pre-emptive breed banning. That's even more ridiculous than "regular" BSL. If the dog is secure and has no history of aggression, these petition-signers need to find something more constructive to do.
Posted by: April | February 21, 2008 5:53 PM
That's ridiculous. You know, I've seen a lot of kids that are pretty intimidating looking, too. Maybe they should be taken off the street. Not that they did anything wrong, I just don't like the way they look. Same nonsense as this.
Posted by: Linda | February 21, 2008 8:52 PM
I am the owner of an american pit bull terrier, and I don't understand the panic, that a breed of dog can cause. except for the yellow journalism that has caused this. My Princess would rather love somebody to death with licking and cuddling, than any kind of aggression. I just wish people would start to use the brains God gave them, instead of just what the news tells them. Of course that would also solve most of the world's problems as well.
Posted by: michele | February 21, 2008 10:19 PM
There was an American Staffordshire Terrier who was a show dog that was recently shot and killed in Texas. Her owners had just bought their house and left her in their FENCED yard. A neighbor felt that she was vicious, so he shot and killed her. The dog was found shot dead, in her own yard.
Unfortunately, owners of pits or pit mixes need to be diligent in watching over their dogs, even when it seems they may be safe.
Posted by: carey hughes | February 25, 2008 6:58 AM
You frankly, I'm a little intimidated by the family next door to this dog owner and the others that signed this petition.
Do you think it would be ok if we just "banned" all of them and their offspring. I know I would feel safer.
Posted by: Maccabees | February 25, 2008 1:42 PM
The Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave. The country where my neighbor can decide they think my dog *looks* intimidating and have my dog taken away from me. What has this country come to? I suggest we try first to control the abberant human behavior that leads to improper human citizens raising improper canine citizens, regardless of dog breed/mix. Let's stop scapegoating the pit bull, shall we, and focus on the real problems at hand.
Posted by: Sarah | February 26, 2008 1:57 PM
http://www.dogassault.com/
Lout dog owners are out of control in our country- this website has a solution
Posted by: Chanchu | February 27, 2008 1:31 AM
I am a new pit owner, I have an adult mix, but my 8wk old is my first all pit dog. I am already starting to see the way that people automatically react to the fact that I have a pit. The only thing that I can think of is to make sure my pit is a great dog so everybody she meets will rethink what a pitbull is.
Posted by: pricilla's mommy | February 27, 2008 11:07 PM
I just think it's sad that the only conclusion that people can come to is to just get rid of them. A dog acts as it is trained to act. Pit bulls are a larger breed, yes, but if they are trained correctly then they are as harmful as a shih-tzu. I've seen pit bulls let 2 year olds poke their eyes and pull their ears and they just sit there...yeah. Real harmful.
Posted by: Cate LeJeune | March 1, 2008 12:56 PM
We also live in a democratic society and if the majority in any community think that any property (yes dogs are property and have no rights) should be banned do to danger or high potential of danger then the majority rules through the democratic process. I would like to see a state ban on this breed as well as several other breeds. I support these near 80 people in their effort.
Posted by: Brian | April 26, 2008 3:37 AM
And here's the problem with that, Brian (well, one of many). "Pit bull" isn't a breed, it's a descriptor applied (and VERY frequently mis-applied) to about 10 or so "breeds" (some AKC recognized, some not) and their mixes. No one can say with absolute certainty if a dog has "pit bull" in them or not. (Boxer mixes as particularly likely to be misidentified as "pit bull" mixes.)
Here's a quiz to identify an APBT:
http://www.pitbullsontheweb.com/petbull/findpit.html
Most people fail it.
Banning "pit bulls" is just an excercise to make the uninformed feel better. Rather than pass bad BSL laws that cause the death of thousands of innocent dogs, why not look at useful laws that target the OWNERS that are irresponsible? Take a look:
http://btoellner.typepad.com/kcdogblog/2008/04/good-ordinances.html
Posted by: John | April 26, 2008 11:14 AM
My suggestion would be that people read Pit Bull Placebo and Fatal Dog Attacks by Karen Delise
http://www.fataldogattacks.com/
and go to the National Canine Research Council
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/default.asp
for well researched facts and stats before either throwing out "stats" based on newspaper accounts or believing "studies" based on newspaper accounts.
People should read this and calm down.
National Canine Research Council
An "Epidemic" of Dog Bites?
http://www.nationalcanineresearchcouncil.com/historicCases.asp
The media want to sell their newspapers.
"Pit Bull" sells papers and gets hits through google alerts.
When the baby was sadly and tragically killed by the Jack Russell Terrier,"Pit Bull" was in every headline.
The "Pit Bull" had nothing to do with the death.It just happened to live in the house.
But the google alerts wouldn`t have picked up JRT.
You`re being suckered by the media, folks.
Look at the real issues and factors surrounding serious bites and the tragic but rare fatalities.
Attempting to demonize a type of dog or breed of dog is a waste of time, energy and resources.
36 breeds/types have been involved in human fatalities in the U.S. and that goes to ~ 50-52 worldwide.
There is obviously more to it than breed.
Should we just ban the ones that have killed and add to it as more kill?
Some people may be very surprised at which dogs are on the "Have killed" list and which dogs aren`t on that list.
Posted by: MG | April 26, 2008 5:45 PM
This poor dog was in it's own FENCED yard and was shot to death for what!!!! They say he didnt like the dog b/c it barked. This is horrible it would be a totally diffrent story if the dog actually was coming at him or trying to harm him but he wasnt. I saw the pic's of this poor animal and watched the memorial on u-tube of gage and cried he looked like the most luving dog, who could be that cruel. That man that did this need's to be punished! I myself own a pitbull she is the most luving dog and is so gentle w/ my children I just couldnt imagine anything like that happening to her it would break my heart. I feel for this family and think that yes there are bad dog's but they are made to be that way and if you raise a dog in a good home w/ lot's of love they will not turn out to be aggressive.
Posted by: heidi | May 14, 2008 11:42 PM
So what if I think my neighbor's Yorkshire terrier is scary (and I have met Yorkshire terriers who would snap anytime a stranger touched them)? Should we ban all Yorkshire terriers?
Or, if you insist on viewing animals as property, what if I'm afraid of thorns? Should everyone in my neighborhood be required to cut down all their rose bushes?
Or what if I'm afraid of people wearing black? Should all black clothes be banned? That would really create a problem for professional musicians, who are required to wear black to work for performances.
This is ridiculous.
Posted by: Ash | June 2, 2008 11:11 PM