Once again, I’m facing weight discrimination.
Not in regards to my own poundage – actually, I may have lost a few during my sabbatical in Montana -- but my trusty mutt Ace, 125 pounds when we arrived in Montana, is probably about 130 now.
It’s a good weight for him, and he’s still fit, but it makes things even more problematic as I Google, and Craigslist, and Apartment.com my way across the Internet in search of living quarters for us upon our return to Baltimore.
In doing so, these are the words that keep jumping out at me: “No dogs,”
And the somehow even more insulting ones: “No dogs over 50 pounds.”
I actually get angry when I see that second one. Some of the biggest dogs are also some of the gentlest and least destructive dogs, and it’s exactly that kind of gross generalization -- big dogs are trouble -- that this blog, since it’s inception, has sought to expose as the utter folly that it is.
Did I just say utter folly?
In that case, here’s an even utterer folly, and a more enraging one: Landlords that ban renters whose dogs are of a particular breed. Argggghhh!
For example, visit Peoplewithpets.com -- a web site that’s supposed to help one find dog-friendly housing, and you might encounter the following: You click on a complex near Whitemarsh that looks somewhat livable and affordable and purports to be dog-friendly -- only to be greeted with the news that having a dog will cost you an additional $150 deposit and an additional $30 a month rent.
Then, reading further, you find that the landlord bans “pit bulls, Rottweilers, chows, Dobermans, or any other known to be aggressive dog.”
That’s “breedism.” That’s “doggie profiling.” Landlords have a right to decide whether to accept pets and which kinds they might permit -- and there's nothing I can do about it, at least until my plan to create a DCLU (Dog Civil Liberties Union) gets off the ground.
Meanwhile, as Ace is part rottie, part chow, it looks like he won’t be living in Whitemarsh.
(Like he wanted to anyway.)
On apartments.com, they break dogs down into those under 25 pounds and those over 25 pounds, which it considers “large.” A 30-pound dog isn’t a large dog any more than a 500- square- foot apartment is a large apartment.
Of course, adding to my anger, is the fact that I can’t afford anything, especially given the budget I’ve placed myself under in hopes of finally ridding myself of credit card debt.
I’ve done some math (always dangerous) and the way I figure it, if I limit myself to $800 a month, and live in even utterer frugality than I now do, I could have my debt paid off in two years. It would only take six months to pay it off if I went homeless, and avoided not just rent but electric, cable and Internet bills.
Then there’s always the liveaboard fantasy, where Ace and I would pay a small fee to camp out in somebody’s docked boat. Having a few liveaboard friends, though, I know the reality is somewhat less romantic than the fantasy, especially in winter. Besides, Ace doesn’t like water more than knee-high.
I’ve considered touting myself as a house-sitter and Ace as a home protection system, but even though he’s a 130-pound Chow-Rottweiler, he’s not nearly fierce enough -- contrary to what those landlords in Whitemarsh might assume.
But then we all know what they say about those Whitemarshans.