« Local Sears store excels in energy-saving contest | Main | Goucher, UM climb green campus ratings, Hopkins slips »

October 27, 2010

Even the Nanticoke, Bay's healthiest river, has issues

The Nanticoke River on the Eastern Shore, which many consider to be the Chesapeake Bay's most pristine - or least degraded - river, has earned a B-minus health grade overall on the first report card put together by scientists and water watchdogs.

The report card, released today, finds that while the river's water quality was good enough overall to support fish and shellfish, the upper stretch reaching into Delaware and the creeks feeding into the Nanticoke were plagued by high levels of nitrogen.

"Despite its general health ... it does have issues, nutrients being one of them," EB James, executive director of the Nanticoke Watershed Alliance, said in an email.  "Whereas the Maryland portion of the river is heavily wooded and has lots of marshes, the Delaware portion has a great deal of farmland and a more urban nature- at least at the head of the river in Seaford."

Many consider the Nanticoke the most biologically diverse and healthiest of the Chesapeake Bay's rivers.  Its 30-mile length is free of dams and still supports good fisheries.  It boasts the northernmost stand of bald cypress on the Atlantic coast, and the highest concentration of bald eagles in the Northeast.  At its mouth, where it meets Blackwater and Fishing Bay, is Maryland's largest tidal marsh.  The 725,000-acre watershed is 46 percent forested, 39 percent farmland and only 6 percent developed.

The report card gave the Nanticoke proper and its largest tributary, Marshyhope Creek, B-minus grades, tying the upper Western Shore's Bush and Gunpowder rivers for the highest health ratings earned this year by any Chesapeake Bay waters assessed by University of Maryland scientists.  But Broad Creek and other creeks feeding into the lower river fared worse, and Fishing Bay, which influences water quality in the lower river, scored poorly across the board, earning a D-plus for poor water clarity, high nutrient levels and even potentially unsafe bacteria counts.   Only the Baltimore area's Patapsco and Back rivers have been rated worse, with an 'F' health grade.

The report card says treated wastewater from sewage plants, septic systems and industrial activities, plus over-application of fertilizer on farms and residential lawns, are all sources of the river's elevated nutrient levels. For more, go here.

(Marshyhope Creek, May 1995.  Baltimore Sun photo)

Posted by Tim Wheeler at 11:44 AM | | Comments (0)

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About the bloggers
Tim WheelerTim Wheeler reports on the environment and Chesapeake Bay. A native of West Virginia, he has focused mainly on Maryland's environment since moving here in 1983. Along the way, he's crewed aboard a skipjack in the bay, canoed under city streets up the Jones Fall from the Inner Harbor, and gone deep underground in a western Maryland coal mine. He loves seafood, rambles in the country and good stories. He hopes to share some here.

Contributor Christy Zuccarini has been blogging about the local DIY craft scene for a year for She brings her pespective on all things handmade to B'More Green, where she will highlight projects you can do yourself as well as crafters who are integrating sustainable methods and materials.

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
  • Sign up for the At Home newsletter
The home and garden newsletter includes design tips and trends, gardening coverage, ideas for DIY projects and more.
See a sample | Sign up

Charm City Current
Stay connected