« MD eyes bans on BPA, flame retardant | Main | Baltimore Public Works Museum to close »

February 3, 2010

New way found to tell when species are threatened


Some researchers say they've developed a new method of determining when species are threatened, and it's a lot sooner than previously thought.

The researchers at Baylor University and ecologists from the University of Maryland, Baltimore County are using this new statistical analysis to measure the impact of human-caused environmental degradation on environmental biodiversity. They say it's more precise than current methods.

That precision has shown that scientists were off the mark about the "tipping point" at which species are threatened.

The new method is called the Threshold Indicator Taxa Analysis (TITAN) and is detailed in the British Ecological Society's journal Methods in Ecology and Evolution.

"This new method addresses what we perceived to be problems with existing quantitative approaches for detecting 'thresholds' in the response of organisms to pollutants," said Ryan King, associate professor of biology at Baylor, who developed the metod with Matthew Baker, assistant professor of geography and environmental systems at UMBC.

"Many types of organisms will suddenly decline or disappear once a threshold level of pollution is reached," he said in a statement. "We were particularly dissatisfied with the lack of sensitivity of existing methods and some of the assumptions required by those methods. This method has proven to be much more sensitive while also being very precise in its estimation of thresholds."

Identifying the tipping points for species is important in protecting them and better understanding how ecosystems respond to environmental changes such as global warming, coal mine leaching, agricultural pollution and runoff from development.

For example, the researchers using the new analysis found that it take development of only 1 to 3 percent of land in a watershed to negatively affect the aquatic life. Old methods would show that it would take 20 to 30 percent. 

"This really surprised us, but after carefully examining the data and testing the method using simulations, it became apparent that these declines were real," King said. "It certainly brings to light a strikingly strong relationship between development and degraded water quality in streams, but the mechanisms are not yet clear."

AFP/Getty Images photo of polar bear at Berlin Zoo

Posted by Meredith Cohn at 10:58 AM | | Comments (0)
Categories: News

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About the bloggers
Tim WheelerTim Wheeler reports on the environment and Chesapeake Bay. A native of West Virginia, he has focused mainly on Maryland's environment since moving here in 1983. Along the way, he's crewed aboard a skipjack in the bay, canoed under city streets up the Jones Fall from the Inner Harbor, and gone deep underground in a western Maryland coal mine. He loves seafood, rambles in the country and good stories. He hopes to share some here.

Contributor Christy Zuccarini has been blogging about the local DIY craft scene for a year for She brings her pespective on all things handmade to B'More Green, where she will highlight projects you can do yourself as well as crafters who are integrating sustainable methods and materials.

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
  • Sign up for the At Home newsletter
The home and garden newsletter includes design tips and trends, gardening coverage, ideas for DIY projects and more.
See a sample | Sign up

Charm City Current
Stay connected