baltimoresun.com

« Spotlight on safety after cyclist killed | Main | Crab license buyback gets a nibble »

August 6, 2009

Governor O'Malley to tap the sun to save $$

As part of the state overall effort to cut its carbon footprint, and save money, it plans to install solar thermal panels on the roof of Government House, the governor's mansion, to heat the water. Statehouse reporter Laura Smitherman and I reported in a story today.

Gov. O'Malley has already installed more efficient lighting and temperature control. The First Family has also ramped up recycling, planted a vegetable garden and installed an irrigation system that uses rain water caught in several barrels on the property.

The house is historic, so the solar panels will not be visable from the street. They are expected to save the family about half on their water heating bill.

A local contractor not involved in the project, Mark Bartlett, owner of AtisSun Inc., says a system for a typical homeowner costs $8,000-$10,000 and pays for itself in four to seven years (largely because there are federal and state incentives available -- though the state now has a wait list.) 

The clean energy also means a savings of about 2,000 pounds of C02 a year. The O'Malleys will probably spend a little more, but save a little more, too.

So, is this a good investment by taxpayers? Should we all get solar thermal or solar electric panels?

Baltimore Sun file photo of Government House/Barbara Haddock Taylor

 

Posted by Meredith Cohn at 12:38 PM | | Comments (3)
Categories: News
        

Comments

yes, all new buildings and upgrades should include solar panels and energy efficient practices. The government should provide incentives that are easy to take advantage of.

I'd like to see the math. My gas bill in the summer when I only use gas for hot water is about $10 a month after I subtract the mandentory $13 BGE customer fee. Now I'm just a one person house but even with four people that might be $40 a month. It would take more than a decade to even start saving money even after getting 50% of the installation back in tax breaks.

I vote for solar thermal. It just makes so much sense: the choice is to continue to purchase ever-increasingly expensive fossil fuel and pollute the atmosphere or gain independence from energy providers, produce your own clean energy and fix our energy costs for the future.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About the bloggers
Tim WheelerTim Wheeler reports on the environment and Chesapeake Bay. A native of West Virginia, he has focused mainly on Maryland's environment since moving here in 1983. Along the way, he's crewed aboard a skipjack in the bay, canoed under city streets up the Jones Fall from the Inner Harbor, and gone deep underground in a western Maryland coal mine. He loves seafood, rambles in the country and good stories. He hopes to share some here.

Contributor Christy Zuccarini has been blogging about the local DIY craft scene for a year for Baltimoresun.com. She brings her pespective on all things handmade to B'More Green, where she will highlight projects you can do yourself as well as crafters who are integrating sustainable methods and materials.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
  • Sign up for the At Home newsletter
The home and garden newsletter includes design tips and trends, gardening coverage, ideas for DIY projects and more.
See a sample | Sign up

Charm City Current
Stay connected