40s is not the new 30s when it comes to fertility
If you follow celebrity pregnancies, then you would think it's easy to conceive in your late 30s and 40s.
But no matter how good you look and feel on the outside, your aging ovaries tell another story, according to the New York Times.
Advances in beauty products and dermatology, not to mention manic devotion to yoga, Pilates and other exercise obsessions, are making it possible for large numbers of women to look admirably younger than their years. But doctors fear that they are creating a widening disconnect between what women see in the mirror and what’s happening to their reproductive organs.While each woman’s window of fertility is different (there have been rare cases of women conceiving naturally in their 50s), most doctors agree that by the time a woman is 40, her chances of getting pregnant each month are approximately 5 percent.
The article interviewed women in that age group who are having trouble conceiving and are turning to fertility treatments.
Do you think women are getting unrealistic idea of conceiving later in life? Does the media fuel that idea?









Comments
I think people just live differently these days, and don't even start thinking about kids till much later. A lot of people aren't making the conscious choice to delay, but time suddenly sneaks up.
Posted by: Lola | September 1, 2011 1:15 PM
There is a point in life where you learn to mind your own business and quit making nasty judgments about other people's choices.
Posted by: Cham | September 1, 2011 6:03 PM
I started menopause at 39 and was finished by 42. You just never know what will happen if you wait too long. I agree that celebs and the media make it seem very easy to be an older mom.
Posted by: Marylandmom2 | September 2, 2011 8:02 PM
I don't think women are being unrealistic about conception after their twenties or thirties. There's a balance between putting all your ducks in a row so you have the means to provide for your children while still having the energy to keep up with them. My husband and I waited until he was established in his career so we could afford for me to stay home with our three children, but I have often said that if we had started having children at a younger age we would have had a larger family. We love children, but now I'm in my forties I'm glad we are done with the diapers and the pureeing of food and not having to hunt for a babysitter if I have somewhere to go for a few hours. My children help more with the cooking and cleaning and life for me has gotten less labor intensive. We are not all clones. I really feel like we have a duty to support and encourage one another no matter what age we are when we start our families.
Posted by: Lisa | September 3, 2011 8:48 AM
I guess that statistic shows how an average is not representative of most. A 95% failure rate is practically as good as most birth control. Why even bother with contraception after your mid 30s? I don't think this is accurate for most healthy women who have not gone through early menopause. I'm 41 with a 4 year old and a 12 month old and did not try at all, just let nature take it's course and it did. Maybe I'm just lucky, but I think there is a lot more negative press about "older" moms than positive. The OB treats you like you're a ticking time bomb. It makes you feel older just by all the drama :-) Women have been having kids at this age all along, they just started earlier and had more children.
Posted by: Debra | September 6, 2011 9:09 PM
I think it is a combination of women waiting until later in life to get married, establish careers, and have children, as well as what is being fueled by the media and/or celebrities who make it seem very easy to have kids in your 40's (they all have nannies and other help at their disposal!). I had my son at 39 (now I'm 41 and he's 2) and have made a conscious decision to only have one child because I know the complications that can arise with trying to conceive and having a child into your 40's. Ultimately, women in this older age category need to do what's right for them.
Posted by: Colleen | September 8, 2011 10:15 AM
I am fascinated by the 5% statistic, and also find it hard to believe. We waited, and knew we were taking our chances, but were OK with whatever happened. I had our first at 38 and at 40, we tried for one more, but ended up with twins (naturally - no twins in the family). When the doc told us, he said the incidences of natural twins increases as you get older - which is something maybe more doctors should tell women in their 40's who are thinking about conceiving!
Posted by: Michelle | September 13, 2011 7:46 AM