Should a 3-year-old be suspended for too many potty accidents?
I had a "what the heck" moment when I read this story.
A public preschool in Arlington suspended a 3-year-old who apparently had too many potty accidents. You read that right. The student in question is all of three years old!
According to the Washington Post, Zoe Rosso was suspended in December and her parents were told not to return for a month or until Zoe did not have any more accidents. Zoe's mom is urging the school board to change its policy, referring to it as the "potty manifesto."
According to Zoe's mom, Betsy Rosenblatt Rosso: "We would like Arlington County to revise its policy so that other kids and other families won't have their lives disrupted like this for something that's totally developmentally normal." "If a kid is emotionally and intellectually ready for school . . . then they should have the ability to go, regardless of whether their bladder has caught up with their brain."
Rosso said Zoe only had a handful of accidents when she was removed from school.
Arlington's Office of Early Childhood told the Post that toilet-training for 3-year-olds has been county policy for decades. The county removes a child who has eight accidents in a month.
The story touches upon a myriad of issues, including a growing trend of pushing academics to ever-younger students as well as the developmental implications of fast-tracking potty training when children may not be ready.
Frankly, I was shocked to learn that there is a new movement to teach infants as young as three months to begin potty training. Based on the experts that the Post quoted, potty accidents should be expected and are normal as kids go through the process.
Arlington's policy seems over the top to me. What has your experience been? Anyone know what the policy is at school systems in the Baltimore area?
Take the poll:









