baltimoresun.com

« Weekend pick: Time for camp | Main | Using the categories »

March 7, 2008

What do you think about the latest on autism and vaccines?

It's been debated for years whether there's a link between childhood vaccines and autism, with many research studies concluding there was no connection, and a small but vocal cadre of parents with autistic children fervently believing otherwise.

Now, the Sun reports today, federal health officials have acknowledged that a series of vaccines given to a now-9-year-old girl when she was living in Ellicott City years ago worsened an underlying condition and led her to be diagnosed with autism. The Centers for Disease Control is telling the public that the girl's case was unique, and that immunization is safe and vital to protect children from diseases. Still, officials are worried this case will make parents reluctant to have their children vaccinated.

How do you react to this news? I'd like to hear from pediatricians, parents, and pediatrician/parents.

 

Posted by Kate Shatzkin at 1:51 PM | | Comments (3)
Categories: Health
        

Comments

I am the mother of a 20 year old autistic child and the aunt of 2 autistic nephews ages 23 and 16 now. When my youngest nephew was born (hes 7 now) his mother [my sister] requested his vacines be "spread apart", and he is "normal". Instead of mercury, thermisol, etc., can the vacines JUST be given "ungrouped" and tested?

I think the the findings of the CDC in this case will open a flood of lawsuits, and possibly settlements. I do not however believe that vaccines "cause" autism. My son's first speech therapist believed there was something MUCH deeper and most likely genetic or mutagenic causing the escalation of diagnosis' in the past decade. She pointed to the high concentration of kids diagnosed in Silicon Valley as evidence of a selective genetic role.
I asked both of my son's pediatricians about the preservative used in the vaccines adminstered, and both assured me they did not use thimerosal vaccines. Our youngest son's doctor said he didn't believe that the Thimerosal was harmful, but since the vaccines were available without it, why chance it?

I think it's important to remember that this case is unique. Vaccines didn't CAUSE the girls autism, she was already predisposed to it from a rare genetic condition. If not vaccines, any other number of factors could have activated the disease.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Kate Shatzkin
Kate Shatzkin is the parenting and families content editor at The Baltimore Sun and, before that, was its family beat reporter. But her most challenging and rewarding job is being mother to Leah, 8, and Sam, 6.

In her 14 years at The Baltimore Sun, Kate also has covered nonprofit organizations, prisons and courts, and has written several investigative series. She was previously a Knight journalism fellow at Yale Law School and a reporter at the Seattle Times and at the Patriot-Ledger of Quincy, Mass. She lives in Baltimore with her family.

Follow @charmcitymoms on Twitter
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

My Maryland Family
Family topics in the news
Baltimoresun.com's school closings database is designed to provide up-to-date, easy-to-access information in the event of inclement weather.

Find out if your school is participating and sign up for e-mail alerts.
Most Recent Comments
Photo galleries
Stay connected