« Audience rises to 63.2 million for Obama-McCain 2 | Main | Ali Velshi and Z: head to head on CNN's Reliable Sources »

Hannity hits new low (even for him) with Palin-McCain

bhannityAs servile and journalistically bankrupt as Fox News host Sean Hannity behaved three weeks ago during a conversation with Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin, it was merely prelude to the role he took on Wednesday night in an "interview" with Palin and her running mate, Sen. John McCain.

It quickly became apparent that the session was not aimed at defining issues and candidate positions, or probing the candidates on the several crises facing the nation today in hopes of giving voters information that would help them make an informed choice. Instead it became an exercise in Hannity methodically going point by point over what appeared to be a list of things McCain wished he had said in Tuesday's debate with Sen. Barack Obama -- but didn't.

It got far worse, however, when Hannity shifted to a new role of using interviewer queries not as softballs for the candidates to hit out of the park, but instead using the questions to give voice to unsubstantiated accusations against Obama. Under the false guise of journalism, Hannity used questions Wednesday to say things about Obama too nasty for even the candidates to say about their opponent -- without risking widespread press condemnation and voter turnoff. This had more to do  with political theater, show trials in totalitarian regimes and the darkest edges of propaganda than it did journalism.

Here's the way it went on the Fox News Channel Wednesday after Hannity brought up Obama's past relationship with 1960s radical William Ayers, and then characterized it as on-going with this bit of innuendo: "You know they sat on multiple boards together. We know they've given speeches together. We know there's been sort of a back and forth financially. Ayers contributing to Obama, Obama sort of working some money back through them."

And then Hannity really got down to business.

HANNITY: "... And I guess my question is, should the American people be concerned that he’s (Obama) capable in a post-9/11 world of fighting terrorism, when he is friends with an unrepentant terrorist?"

MCCAIN: "Well, I think that's also part of the judgment the American people make. But first, I think we ought to have a full and complete examination of the relationship. And then the American people can make a judgment. And so far, I think it's very clear that he was a lot more than just a guy in the neighbor (sic)."

HANNITY: "You think this needs to be asked more in your next debate? Do you think it should have — because a lot of us in the media are sitting back thinking... that this is something that needs to be vetted out."

MCCAIN: "Well I hope it's vetted out, if it needs to be vetted out. And I think the American people understand whether Senator Obama has been truthful and candid about his entire relationship with Mr. Ayers, and with others very frankly."

 

HANNITY: "Let's talk about others."

MCCAIN: "Including the ACORN organization."

HANNITY: "Well, we've got — this is now part of a larger narrative that's emerging. And the Obama campaign seems very, very defensive about this. They don't want any questions, how dare you ask, this is unfair. But he's friends with Father Pfleger, a radical — fairly radical figure in Chicago, Tony Rezko, a convicted slumlord, we have him on tape. And we know that he spent 20 years in the pews of Reverend Wright, who has said the most outrageous things, including G.D. America and ‘America's chickens have come home to roost’ after 9/11. What does that tell you, Governor, about Senator Obama and his radical associations?"

PALIN: "It goes right back again to the candidate's judgment and who he chooses to associate himself with in the past, perhaps the present. It makes me question who he would associate himself with in the future."

HANNITY: "Yes. And we should — Americans should be concerned about it."

PALIN: "I'm concerned about it."

And on it goes, McCain and Palin acting statesmanlike, while Hannity, sounding like their deputy minister of propaganda, does the dirty work of slander and innuendo.

We have seen this before with the journalists who served the Red-baiting, Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950s as he tried to destroy the careers of any who dared oppose him.

Just as McCarthy was ultimately censured by his colleagues in the Senate, many of those journalists ended their careers in shame.

Hannity this week, reportedly signed a new contract that will keep in a starring role at Fox through 2012.

Comments

and if McCain had slimy friends like Obama who were terrorists and pastors who preached hate against other humans, I suppose CNN and MSNBC, and all the other Liberal Media NutJobs would be perfectly right in asking about that. Come on- you liberals need to wake up before we elect a SOCIALIST as the President. God Bless America- and quickly!

Much like yourself Hannity isnt a journalist. He is a commentator and talk show host. He isnt supposed to be an unbiased reporter of the news, his job is to give his opinion. The left wing Obama loving newsmedia --all 95% of them, are tasked with objectively presenting the news in an unbiased manner. Unfortunately, your newsreading allies do a woeful job of hiding their bias. Hannity isnt a reporter nor does he claim to be. Katie Couric, Brian Williams and Charlie Gibson claim to be unbiased reporters which I am sure that you agree with but most clearheaded folks know otherwise. They are about as unbiased as Oprah.
Where are the reports on Obama's ties to ACORN or his sleazy staff members who benefitted from the Freddie and Fannie collapses? I know where they arent, on ABC, CBS and NBC or any other place sympathetic to the liberal cause.
Come on Mr. Z shouldnt you be writing about what happened on Dancing With The Stars or something? I mean its kind of hard to take you seriously on this.

Hi Jeff, Click back on the link in the post to the piece I wrote three weeks ago on Hannity and Palin. Lots and lots of people took it seriously. PS. I am going to be writing about "Dancing with the Stars." There are lots of power, race, class and gender issues in that show. Very important culturally. There is a reason millions watch each week. Thanks. Z

You are working for the right paper, the liberal Sun.

I can see why McCain would choose to sit down and talk with Hannity and not Letterman. The easy road is much easier especially when someone else is driving for you. I do commend McCain and Palin for acting, as you said, "statesmanly," but if they were as statesmanly as they seemed, I believe this interview would have been turned down.

I know that this election is a hot topic right now, but we've been missing out on your opinions of True Blood and Entourage episodes among many others. So could we please get at least one post this week recapping some of the fine and some of the not so fine programming that this season is playing for us. Thanks.

I haven't really read your blog before, but Sean Hannity is such a joke and I had to check it out and couldn't agree more. He got his karma on live TV from Robert Gibbs though: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zgn6rjGbp0c

To the other posters, at least Olberman and MSNBC don't run "Fair and Balanced" bumpers every commercial break. Do a word count on an episode and see if Hannity and Colmes get equal time.

When it comes to Ayers, I don't like him and I don't support a thing he's ever done, but McCain is no man to talk about who sat on a board with who or who has shady associations (Keating). He can't even seriously rebuke Obama for taking campaign funds from Fannie Mae since his top advisor Phil Gramm (actual advisor not just ones McCain says were tied to Obama and has since been disproved here http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/fanniemae.asp) took millions from Fannie/Freddie on a lobbying retainer. It's ok though, he didn't ever do any work for it.

You should all make sure that there's no soap on the soap box before you get on it or you may slip and look like an idiot.

Hi James, The blog is kind of new -- three weeks old. Thanks for checking it out, and for the thoughtful comments. Z

Hey Paul in Minnesota, Barack isn't going to bring socialism to America; George Bush has already done that for us by bailing out those who believe that corruption and avarice are acceptable. Get your head out of your right-wing ass and look around buddy. This country is falling apart because of imbicles like you who have given support to an administration that could better be described as a confederacy of dunces! Fox News isn't news its more like a state-run station, you know the kind they have in China and Russia;their motto is there is only one truth and that truth is what we present to the people. If its cold enough right now in Minnesota then I suggest you pack your fishing gear and head on up to the nearest frozen lake and do some ice fishing until next Spring.

JB

Thank You for validatiing this. I listen to his radio show daily and can't believe the
very racist undertones and fear mongering always there. By the way, isn't Hannitys good friend a known Neo-Nazi? How come
no one brings that up?

Hannity might not be a journalist (as you have shown yourself NOT to be)- but he DID bring out Obama's odious associations between Rev. G.D. America Wright, Bill Ayres, Tony Rezko- and the rest- BEFORE anyone else in the MSM did.
Now that the MSM HAS to report on the Anoninted One's friends, mentors and business associates, even his ANGRY WIFE (America is a downright MEAN Country) - they BEGRUDGINGLY bring it to the forefront- and STILL try to downplay the importance of these bad judgments, naivete and criminal behaviors.
Sean Hannity IS a great American.
And you're NOT!

This is the story people need to focus on - Palin's terrorist ties with Iran!!!

http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2008/10/07/palins_unamerican
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eniG9l_7its

Only ignorant clueless people take Hannity's rants seriously. Whenever Republicans screw up, they get a free pass on his show. That's no way to win an election as the polls readily show. These right-wing nut jobs are seriously freaking out about this. They know a black man will be the next President, and they can't stand it.

There was a day in the USA when, if a white man wanted some more land, he'd basically go out and shoot the Indians who were living on it. Boy, are those days over.

Hi, I get your points. But I think we have to take people like Hannity very seriously. This is a very dangerous game they are playing these days at Fox. This is the stuff of demogogues and propagandists, and we have to always be alert to it. This is how both a free press and deomcracy are subverted. I know I might sound high and mighty about this, but I believe it with every fiber. What he did -- using the cover of journalistic questions to slander a candidate with innuendo -- is dangerous. Thanks. Z

It's really very simple. This guy is the reincarnation of the Nazi propagandist, Goebbels. No difference.

I think both candidates should be fully investigated. This would solve the entire truth issue: Hook both candidates up to a lie detector, and ask Obama about Ayers, and McCain about his family vacations with Charles Keating. We'll see who the BS artists are. While we're at it, we can hook up Hannity and ask him if he think he is fair and balanced. We can hook up Keith Ohlberman too, and ask him if he would like to comment on Reverend Right. The blogs are interesting, but they are 99% BS. Hannity and Ohlberman are both frauds, and doing a huge disservice to American voters. Slinging mud does not make you a "Great American". Let's get down to the real policies, and stop the whinning. As an American, I want to know what the candidates want to do, not what their opponents will do in their biased opinions. We need campaign BS reform. How about a McCain-Obama Act to stop negative campaigning. That might just bring the dignity back to politics. What is the point of the campaign trail if a bunch of biased party pundints sling a bunch of garbage as their commentary? Anyone? Message to O'Reilly: The "Pinheads of the Year Award" should be a tie between Hannity and Ohlberman.

I think America could do with some socialism, I mean, capitalism seams to be working so well for you guys right now (I hope you can appreciate the sarcasm).

I challenge Sean Hannity to a boxing match. He's a doughboy mouthy wimp.

Gerald Clough
http://www.savagerun.com

Obama never dropped napalm from 30,000 feet on innocent vietnamese villagers. Who's the real terrorist?

Even the people who try to defend Hannity show their own lack of knowledge. Hannity does call himself a "journalist" so Jeff Kern is immediately discredited. Hannity does say that he offers equal time to all sorts of view points. Maybe this percieved media bias you claim has to do with the fact that McCain has to watch over Palin when she does her limited interviews. She can't answer tough questions on her own. McCain has purposely distanced himself from the media that he used to call his strongest base because he would have to answer questions about all the lies and mistruths that are coming from his campaign. If you expect to get the full details from the MSM on either side of the campaign then you are naive at best.

YOU ARE ONE BIASED IDIOT you are no better than Katie Couric OR THE OTHER CLOWN WHO INTERVIEWED PALIN WHY DON'T YOU GET A REAL JOB SINCE YOU DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO THE ONE YOU ARE PRESENTLY IN NOW

It's funny that with all the rantings of Sean Hannity, Bill O'Reilly, Rush Limbaugh, and others that are so widespread over TV and Radio, The Right still want to play the Left-Wing Media Bias Card.

It's also funny that these same conservatives will play the LWMB Card whenever someone questions McCain's involvement with the Keatings, or Palin's pastor in a televised witch hunt. But will completely excuse Fox News doing an hour long special on Obama's "shady dealings" as good journalism.

I think we all need to realize that Most Conservatives subscribe to the Fox News definition of Fair and Balanced... which would be Right Winged Leaning.

I think that there are truths in what was said by Reverend Wright. America created Osama bin Laden with it's cold war against Russia in Afghanistan. Even if that was not how it was meant, past foreign policy has sown much descent around the world against America. I believe Saddam was put in place by the States as well. If the 'chickens' coming home to roost' is thought of in that sense then it is unfortunate that this topic probably cannot be touched without creating a furore of public accusation thanks to how it has been cast in the media.

What is disheartening is seeing how hate is fuelling the GOP fire against Obama. I think questions over past links are justifiable, but playing guilt by association as so many have said is a dark way to motivate people.

What's more is how thoroughly some people have been brainwashed in America. Since when was helping your fellow man/woman Socialism? If you exclude yourself from society, fine, but if you buy into it, receive it's benefits, you should shoulder the responsibility of society as well. I think the notion of the individual is taken too far in America when people believe they have a right to everything but a responsibility to nothing.

The FBI is not stupid, if Obama was involved with terror we would have known this years ago,(I might be mistaken but wasn't he a child then!); also the Hillary people would have said something like that during the time she was running. Can't you see the republicans are doing all they can to not talk about the real issues our country is in. Obama is trying to address this. This is dirty politics and Obama is about helping all races of people. Come on people stop and think. First Obama wasn't experience then came Palin and they stopped talking about experience. Obama was in the senate for years with inside information, Palin was govn. two years in Alaska. Obama is a Harvard Graduate.

socialist? lol. wow, you people sure have an eye for detail.

given the current state of things, it's safe to suggest that terms like socialism & capitalism are grossly outdated (hence Obama's remark in the 2nd debate that our conception of government regulation is anachronistic). for example, which version of capitalism (Smith, Keynes) do you have in mind?

economists rarely, if ever, use this opposition, because it's simply meaningless. there are so many nuances to capitalism, for instance, that government regulation can be opposed to it or part and parcel of the definition.

if you're going to use fancy political terms, do your history first.

You know Z Jeff makes some really good points. But hey Z, if reporters, columnists, journalists and bloggers, such as yourself, had to disclose their political leanings next to their names by using R, D or I, which one would you use. But then why bother, it's pretty obvious anyway. Like minds always think they're great.

All I have to say is if the tables were reversed and Sean Hannity had interviewed Biden and "That One" and extolled their virtues, you would be singing his praises. CNN, MSNBC, and all the other so-called journalists "liberally" yak to us every night about how noble, calm, reassuring, knowledgeable, likeable, intelligent (bordering on genius) the Messiah is. Frankly, I'm sick of it. It makes me puke. The only reason I briefly turn to those networks is to see what the ignorant fools are saying. I am actually hoping they see the light, but I don't think that's going to happen. I wonder how much "That One" and his wifey laugh at you people. They, along with Ayers, Wright, and Axelrod have duped you. If he gets in, our country will no longer be the United States of America. It will be the Divided States of Obama. He might even have a coronation. The man doesn't want to be President, he want to be King of the World.

I watched the news showing McCain’s interview on Fox being televised on CNN, FOX, and other networks. In the interview McCain said he wanted Obama to come out with the truth about Ayers so the public can decide. Why isn’t anyone calling out McCain on his hypocrisy on TROOPERGATE? He asks for public truth from Obama, yet he sends his lawyers to Alaska to cover up TROOPERGATE to avoid public scrutiny. Why doesn’t McCain let Palin testify about her TROOPERATE connection so the American Public can decide – the same standard he wants to apply to Obama. Do you smell hypocrisy?

I don’t want to hear this excuse that TROOPERGATE is politically motivated and that the AYERS connection isn’t. Palin was in office as a government official during TROOPERGATE while Obama was eight years old when Ayers did his despicable act. You tell me which has more validity in applying a standard of judgment -- a person governing when the act was being committed or a person who was eight years old when someone else committed the act?

If judgment is what McCain is questioning about Obama, shouldn’t the American pubic question McCain’s judgment for picking a VP that may be using her powers for personal reasons? Sounds like Bush/Chaney tactic to twist the law f to protect them elves and those they surround themselves with. After all, Palin's character could be a heart beat away from the Presidency if McCain is elected. The public deserves the truth by her testifying in front of an INDEPENDENT board, not one she picks. How many middle class citizens you know that would get away with ignoring a subpoena -- hmmm, I guess if you could hire high powered lawyers to put you and your cronnies above the law, you could.

Come on, what are you afraid of McCain, the truth? McCain keeps preaching about transparency in government, but I guess that only applies to others, not himself or those he surrounds himself with.

McCain seems to wear hypocrisy as well as one of his thousand dollar suits. His campaign and campaign tactics looks more and more like the same eight years of Bush scare tactics that middle class come to despise. BUSH SCARE TACTICS MAY OF WORKED FOR THE WAR, BUT IT WON'T WORK FOR THE ECONOMY. WE SWALLOWED THE BUSH SCARE TACTIC PILL BEFORE AND THE ONLY CURE FOR THIS CANCER IS TO PUT IN OFFICE SOMEONE THAT DOESN'T REFLECT BUSH POLICIES WHILE CAMPAIGNING -- WE NEED A PRESIDENT WHO BELIEVES THERE IS A BETTER WAY AND THAT SURE ISN'T THE MCCAIN’S HYPOCRISY POLICY THAT APPLIES TO EVERYONE ELSE, WHILE HE APPLIES DIFFERENT STANDARDS TO HIMSELF AND THE CRONIES HE SURROUNDS HIMSELF WITH.

BRING IT ON, MCCAIN, AT THE NEXT DEBATE. I DARE YOU!

Obama Youth will be the ultimate reflection of political correctness and the death of individuality in our children. Uniformity in schools means no opposition to Socialism in the future. Mao is smiling.

To Paul,

No, media has been appropriately quiet about McCain's pastor's racist remarks.

You do not see on any channel specials where Obama spends 30 min telling stories of their opponents.

The whole Ayer story is so retarded.

I think last 8 years have been quite radical. I don't want more of that kind of radicalism either so stay at home McCain.

Hannity is only trying to counter the Main Stream, I meand Down Stream Media. When was the last time that Obama was grilled on all these unanswered questions? Why is Obama being dishonest on his relationships? Even his tax cut for 95% his a LIE. Why wasn't Joe Biden called on his 14 lies at the debate by the DSM?

Seems a lot of Americans have forgotten what journalism is supposed to be. News people are supposed to challenge, prod, counterbalance and even cross-examine public figures. Why? To hold them to account. Hannity, acting as a shill by lobbing suggested talking points to Palin and McCain is certainly not a journalist. Fox News is generating cheap propaganda in a way that Pravda would have admired. Only knuckle-draggers still watch Faux News and Hannity for simulated information...actually pure administration propaganda. Fairly Unbalanced would be a slogan much closer to the truth.

I watch Hannity often. The guy is clueless and needs to grow up and learn how to deal with people. He needs to understand that this is about our tomorrow instead of was happened yesterday.

I find it humorous when people claim that almost all of the news is biased and solely supportive of Obama/Liberals. It seems even funnier when people claim that FOX news is the only source of good and fair reporting. But most of all, I find it sad that these same people cling to the assumption that the "liberal" media is out to get them and their canidate. So I have to ask, don't these people think it's strange that the majority of reporters and journalists, who are following this election much closer than the average joe (or "joe six-pack"), are leaning more towards Obama and away from the negative and often ridiculously manipulative campaign of McCain/Palin? Could it be that all those reporters and journalists have been paid off? Is it some giant conspiracy? OR has the average Joe been watching too much of FOX news, and only FOX news? If you believe that news has been corrupted by the liberals, then maybe you should go out and find the information for yourself. It's all there. It doesn't need to be told to you, especially from the people at FOX. I've been following the news everyday for two years, and FOX news makes me sick. But then again, I'm one of those people who actually knows what's going on. How? I found out for myself.

I think our tendency to be so sensitive to offending anybody with our words has overtaken priorities here. To me the priority is to fix economy, keep democracy safe from terrorists and continue to give opportunities to people to be the best they can be; The American Dream. In this context, I AS A VOTER WANT TO KNOW who they worked with before, what kind of bills they proposed, who were their allies?? So, yes, Reverend Wright's agenda I want to understand. Similarly, why give money to Ayers for education? what kind of education plan is it? Will Obama support such educational model as presidnet? These issues are too important. Hannity is surely ideological and too intense, but there is such obsession to ensure Obama is the President that his supporters in THE major networks are not examining him. So, Obama is still a mystery. For the first time in my life I have turned to watching Fox although I detested them all of my life. Now, I get information about what he problems could be with "the One". My guess is that if Obama believed it important to give money and partner with Ayers on education, then he found something valuable on that education plan. But, no one has explored the curriculum, costs, benefits for the country. Also, why wouldn't I want to know why a candidate wanting to be president to protect the most successful democracy in the history of the world, has relationships and crazy people that hate the US and it ideas? They will have power and access with Obama so will we see Reverend Wright or his type influence our government under an Obama administration? Let's be concerned with OUR security and financial well being as a nation and worry about hurt feelings later. Let's get all these claims and find out what is there. I saw a cover of some recent magazine cover with Ayers stumping on the flag which to me is very symbolic of what he thinks about this country, same with Rev. Wright. Is that the Change we are being sold here? What will it look like, what does it mean for our rights? I say, go Hannity go and find out what you can and let us know. CNN and the rest of the other networks just want to ensure Obama gets elected so they do all kinds of things to excuse, forgive, ignore or explain any potentially negative thing with Obama. When that doesn't work, they turn on the guilt trip and the race issue. Racism will always be claimed whenever there is no other way to go or even as an easy way to shut down any potential criticism. It happend with Hillary eventhough Hllary has a history of standing up for minority issues, but lord was she turned into a racist merely for running against Obama!!
If Obama's media supporters really want him elected with the moral mandate he needs, they ought to do their job and fairly examine his alliances and plans so we can make a choice. The more the media excuses, ignores and gives a pass to Obama the more influential Hannity and his type will be.In the midst of all this McCain is ignored, maligned, name called. McCain the darling of the democrats and liberals now is akin to a Bush and a terrorist himself! That is obscene because one need not vote for McCain to honor this great man.

WRONG !!

Your first mistake is quantifying Hannity as a legitimate "journalist:........secondly, he is a GOP hack.......enough said.

This is sad and scary when will it stop, this is no laughing matter now. Because many of the Mccain/Palin supports are not that bright and has violent tempers. So planted seeds in their head can make them believe Obama is a terriost. Think of all the Taxi cabs that were threatened after 911 because people thought they were terriost. This is no laughing matter. But see God don't like ugly after today Sarah's Political career will be history and Barack obama will be making history so get over because God has ordered his footstep

Confused Paul in Minnesota, John McCain and Scarry Sara Palin do have slimy friends worth talking about and you can link them as adults not a 60's radical when Obama was 8 but I don't hear you self righteous folks talking about the witch hunter pastor friend of Sara Palin or "don't bury my body under the American flag" leader of the Alaskan Independent Party or the Keaten 5 no that would be an honest debate about something nobody cares about. Why don't you have some guts and say what your real problem is with Obama at least that would be honest instead of searching for stupid stuff to cover who you really are

For all who dump on socialists and their philosophies - Go up to Canada and take a look around. Free Healthcare and no lobbiests, free education and roads that are perfect.
Socialism actually works but you would need to be educated to know that!!. Go Obama!!

Your a complete dxxx.

In reading posts and comments at various sites today, it looks like the floodgates of hatred have now opened. Probably has something to do with the Wisconsin mob scene we all saw in TV last night. Racists comments (with- or w/out the N-word), absurd accusations against Obama, whatever you might expect from the angry posse of McCain supporters who now realize it is going away. White sheets and pointed hoods is all that is missing. One thing is certain: independent and undecided voters (if there are any left) will certainly think twice in joining this ugly crowd. It looks the McCain/Palin campaign has completely lost control of it's direction.

wake up call for america , vote for obama means you will also vote for bin laden............ as president in the White house

Keep up the good fight, David. Thanks for the post. The neocons have no shame. And McCain has sold his soul to the devil.

And this is why John McCain will lose this election. Instead of talking about what he will do if he should become president, with the polls dropping lower and lower for McCain, he has resorted to name calling and mud slinging and appearing on shows that will also do it for him. I was one of one of the undecided, and if this is how McCain behaves, my vote is for Obama. I just tried to google John McCain and this article was on of the first to appear. It is not looking good for the old man.

McCain is obsessed with ACORN?! WTF?

John McCain and his side-kick, Sarah Palin, aren't smart enough to talk with real journalists. That's why they have to stick with the folks at FOXNews.

Hi, I decline commnet except to say we all know how well the Charles Gibson and Katie Couric interviews went for Palin. And it went even worse for her with Couric when her running mate joined the conversation and tried to speak for her. And Palin has not sat down with anyone since, except the safe and servile Sean Hannity. Z

Face it !

Obama is a hell-bent Marxist 'sent' up by the Tom Ayers Marxist Gangster organization, under the personal direction of William Ayers in conjunction with Wade Rathke and ACORN.

Finally ... finally, some MSM light is being shone on this horrific situation. America will look back and be forced to thank the citizens such as Bill Bennet, Mike Church, Andrew Wilkow, Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Micheal Reagan, Cam Edwards and of course, the venerable G. Gordon Liddy.

They and others were willing to stand in the face of rising Obama insanity to defend America.

Obama is toast and I hope the Law deals with him in the harshest way ... he is nothing short of a traitor.

Obama was 'sent'.

In the world of Chicago politics, the oldest classical question is, "Who 'sent' you? Abner Mikva was asked that when he volunteered for Adlai Stevenson in 1948. "Who sent you?" Mikva replied, "Nobody sent me." And the retort came back from the cigar chomping pol: "Well, we don't want nobody that nobody sent."

In Chicago .. EVERYBODY has been 'sent'.

Check the ABC’s Coalition (Alliance for Better Chicago Schools).

Tom & William Ayers met Obama. *1987*

Obama lied. Why do think he lied through his Marxist teeth about this fact?

To Paul in Minnesota:

Actually McCain has been linked to an organization that was funded death squads in the Iran-Contra affair in Nicaragua...
And Palin and her husband have alarming ties to the Alaska Independence Party, which Palin as recently as 6 months ago praised for their efforts...
Here's a choice quote from the leader of the AIP:
"I'm an Alaskan, not an American," Vogler is quoted as saying elsewhere on the party’s website. "I've got no use for America or her damned institutions."

Google: Gateway Pundit: The Obama-Ayers Connection: The Big Lie

Google: Obama, We Are Smarter; We Follow the Money, and It Links You to Bill Ayers in the 1980s


There are many sources rapidly emerging now ... however, these encapsulate it very well.

Obama is indeed a closet Marxist with very well-heeled domestic and foreign Leftist money men banking absolutely on him winning the Presidency.

What does he plan for ‘Obama Youth’, with funding “equal to the American military?”

Mussolini’s ‘Black Shirts’
Hitler’s ‘Brown Shirts’
Obama’s A.C.O.R.N. ‘Red Shirts’


He,he … the gates are opened indeed and despite the machinations of Maobama, ( “You good folks can expect to hear all sorts of things about me! The McCain people will lie and slander and call me all kinds of nasty things!) there just HAS to be that uneasy, queasy acidy feeling rising up from the pit of their stomachs. What is rising are facts. The nasty thing about facts are when presented in the open, they can be verified.

Stanley Kurtz, just this week is adding what will be the coup de grace to Obama. It will clearly demonstrate that Obama had full knowledge of the consequences of forcing banks to write hopelessly damaged mortgages and worked for A.C.O.R.N. and the DEMS to purposely destroy the American financial system.

He did it and he did it with intent.

Hi, I feared that Hannity was trying to stir those horrible Joe McCarthy demons buried deep in the American psyche. But I didn't want to go there without some evidence. Your posts and some of the others are evidence enough for me. Z

Helping your fellow man and women is socialism. People who fear socialism think that socialism is the same thing as communism. Communism is a form of government socialism is a form of economic socialization. Our country was founded on socialism and our founding fathers were socialists. They believed in the good of the community and helping their fellow citizens. Go back and read a history book or two and you may see it. Or read George Washington’s Farwell address where he mentions the risks of political parties and the need for liberalism in a free society. You can still have freedom in a socialistic society where we all help each other instead of just helping ourselves. That attitude is what made our country great no the idea that what’s mine is mine. The middle class worker is essential for the rich man to make his money. The Euro and the Yen (socialistic currency) are both beating the capitalist dollar. Every country whose health care is beating America’s health care is a socialistic society.

Obama said the American people are Bitter, Well McCain said it this week. How come no one seems to be slamming John boy for it. The fact is Americans are bitter quite frankly I have been Pissed off for years now because our country has done nothing to stop our jobs from going over sees.

Rev Wright said that 911 was our fault. Well Long time Republican supporter Jerry Falwell said it too. Fact is 911 was our own fault. We have no business going over to the Middle East and telling them how to live. It is their country, their life, and their religion.

Mrs. Obama said Americans are mean. Well I can’t even go to a church without noticing how those who are different from the majority are ignored and ostracized; Let alone anywhere else in the country. Americans we need to learn to accept a little constructive criticism because there are a lot of jerks out there Just look at some of the hateful remarks on this board(for or against McCain) or listen to the “kill him”, and “he’s a Terrorist” statements this week.

Obama sat on a board with a 60’s terrorist. Well One of John McCain’s (Current) Friends was in the KKK. Review my paragraph on Mean Americans. Last I heard you never really stop being a member. And McCain sought political funding form a man who said Germans did the Jews a favor.

I have listened to both sides of the stories, and made my judgment with research and intelligence. The fact is for everything Obama is accused of John McCain is guilty of. Even My Parents who have voted for republicans ever since I can remember are voting for Obama and my father came from a racist family. And BTW I am not one of Obama’s campaign placing false statements to sway voters. My family, really, have voted republican my entire life (myself included). But I know 4 Virginia votes Obama is getting that have not been polled. Mine is one of them. A guy up the road form me took his John McCain sign down after the VP debates. It has not gone back up yet.

Barrack Obama The Educated Choice

Steve wrote “How many middle class citizens you know that would get away with ignoring a subpoena”

With Palin continuously claiming to be a middle class mom, and so many McCain Supporters stating She is the only Middle class candidate in the election. I want to know how many middle class citizens have their own plane to sell on ebay. Or how many can get paid a lot of money to sit at home. How many of you have a tanning bed in your homes? There is absolutely nothing middle class or any class about Sarah Palin. If McCain wins the election some of our Tax dollars will go to her easy pregnant daughter’s wedding in the White House.

All of that yelling, screaming, and all of those lies, and racial insults, and all of that fear...you know what that is?
That is the sweet sound of the Republican machine crumbling under the weight of eight years of it's very own slime.

Good Riddence. It's time to take back the Constitution and the Bill of Rights; it was never intended to be Republican toilet paper.

As for Socialism: Republicans cannot even admit that their Republican president concocted this "Socialistic" bailout.

Enough with cowboys, dumbasses, and hateful inbreds. It's time to turn a page. With everything we face as a nation, the last thing we need are McCain/Palin flushing the last of this country down the toilet.

Obama’ Tax cut of 95% is not a lie. He is not exaggerating the figures he is getting the figure from something we learn in college Economics (you know the class Palin got a D in) that 95% of the country’s wealth is in the hands of 5% of the population while 5% of the country’s wealth is in the hands of 95% of the populations. I know (since John leads polls in uneducated voters) that most of you will not understand what that means but that is where he gets his 95% claim from. If you add the small business tax cuts, the tax cuts for alternate full research, and the tax cut for companies that provide Jobs for US citizens to the actual 85% of middle class earners you may finds you come up with a figure around 95%. Please do some research and math on these issues before you repeat everything you hear spewed from the mouths of FoxNews and the John McCain campaign.

Barrack Obama The EDUCATED Choice.

McCain/Palin 2008.....I am sorry liberals like you at the Liberal Sun can't handle the truth, maybe that's why the circulation for your newspaper is dropping.......As for Sean Hannity he is a successful commentator, unlike you who could only work for the Sun.........Go ahead and keep routing for Socialiism and you yourself will be censored....If Obama gets elected we'll see a lot of liberties go away, it will just like Martin O'Mally (another one of your favorites) has done in Maryland.....People have to watch what they say and do, because O'Malley gets vengeful.......America is about to become a dictatorship just like the State of Maryland, that's just sad.......

Hi, I'm confused. Is it socialism or a dictatorship that we should be afraid of? And by the way, I think it's a Republican administration that is getting the government into the banking and insurance businesses all of a sudden, isn't it? And how does that square again with deregulation and the saainted marketplace? Thanks. Z

Why is Hannity hitting a new low? I don't get it? Nothing he said in that interview is false.... I just love how anyone can make a story or what someone says look like it was said by such a horrible and dishonest person???? Because of the liberal media Mac hasn't been able to talk about these character issues of Obama, they won't let him, the only time any of this was brought up by Palin the (last week) the media vilified her.... it's unbelievable what you can do, but thankfully I believe Americans who know the truth are not swayed by the negative comments about Hannity's interview. Americans need to wake up and smell the coffee - electing Obama could (hopefully not) make us much more sympathetic to the Muslim inclinations and make changes in our national and foreign policy that could be devasting to all of us in the future - look at what's going on in Europe today - they are losing their countries and soon their culture to the Muslims... this is not an exageration, go to YouTube and type "Europe Islam" and take a look at all the videos that have been made by Europeans fearing that they are losing their countries to Islam.... Hannity knows this as do just a few others, most of us are not willing to contemplate the posibility of that happening to us, in fact, we don't think it can happen here. Remember Hitler, most Europeans ignored him for at least a decade thinking he was harmless... enough said, it's Friday and 5PM and I'm heading home!

Hello, are you serious about saying "nothing" Hannity said is false. What does he mean when he talks about money exchanging hands from Obama back through Ayers? What is that except pure innuendo? There hasn't been a shred of eveidence suggesting any such thing? How about asking if anything he says in such questions is true? the burden on the journalist is to use verified and true information. Z

Unbelievable how the left is defining Obama. The Democrat's put us in this mess and the Reps tried to fix it in 2004. Now the Dems are stealing an issue that only the Reps are qualified to use. Dems caused Fannie and Freddy to fail when they refused to fix it in 2004 . This is a matter of record, do a simple search under Maxine Waters 2004 to watch the Dems rip on the regulator from the Bush White House.

Hi, This might be one of the most desperate spin jobs of all time. The hardcore, de-regulate-everything, get-government-out-of-my-life conservative choir that started singing its hosanna to the free and almighty marketplace in 1980, now says, "Not us. It was the liberal Democrats who ruined the economy." Too bad Herbert Hoover didn't think of this. Wait, maybe it was the evil FDR who caused the Great Depression. Oh no, that's history on the Bizarro Planet -- the very place that this new spoin job is coming from. Please, give it a rest. So, says Citizen Z, anyway. Z

From Mr "Z"

"Hi, I feared that Hannity was trying to stir those horrible Joe McCarthy demons buried deep in the American psyche. But I didn't want to go there without some evidence. Your posts and some of the others are evidence enough for me. Z"

The fact that I post this analysis should in no way be "enough evidence" for you. You are supposed to be a serious journalist. Therefore, for you to declare this as enough evidence only demontrates one of two possibilities.

1) You need a weak link to Macarthyism and are aware of Obama's very true indoctrination, training and support of full-bore Marxist/Maoist ideology.

or

2) You are not worth a damn as a journalist and despite evidence that 'something' is going on and at a minimum deserves a through journalistic investigation, you do not advocate for it.

If you simply follow the trail of Obama's mentors from his birth to his election to the senate, it becomes crystal clear.

Obama & Obama Sr. Marxist

Obama & Lolo Soetoro Marxist

Obama & Frank Marshall Davis rapist/pedophile

Obama & Jeremiah Wright Marxist/Black Supremist

Obama & Bill Ayers Marxist/Maoist/Bomber

Obama & Bernadette Dohrn Marxist/Maoist/Murderess

Obama & Tom Ayers Traitor/Chicago Gangster

Obama & Rezko/Nadhmi Auchi Gangster/Criminal Financier

Obama & Mike Klonsky Maoist/Societal agitator

Obama & ACORN Obama's 'RED SHIRT' Army Korps

And on and on and on and on ... every one of them haters of America.

And for anyone in this day and age to lecture Americans on the legitimacy or effectiveness of socialism is laughable. It is nothing more than Communism-light, the rot of the world. It has given humans the greatest number of mass murders and more misery than any other form of government.

So, Mr Z, you are speaking an assumption. Your are toting Obama's freshly minted talking point .. the same one I alluded to earlier. He's warning everyone of "smears" to come. What he doesn't let the people know is ..... it is true. Simply the truth.

From Mr "Z” to DeeWillyFree

"Hi, I feared that Hannity was trying to stir those horrible Joe McCarthy demons buried deep in the American psyche. But I didn't want to go there without some evidence. Your posts and some of the others are evidence enough for me. Z"

The fact that WillFree posted that analysis should in no way be enough evidence for you. You are supposed to be a serious journalist. Therefore, for you to declare this as enough evidence only demonstrates one of two possibilities.

1) You need a weak link to Macarthyism and are aware of Obama's very true indoctrination, training and support of full-bore Marxist/Maoist ideology.

or

2) You are not worth a damn as a journalist and despite evidence that 'something' is going on and at a minimum deserves a through journalistic investigation, you do not advocate for it.

If you simply follow the trail of Obama's mentors from his birth to his election to the senate, it becomes crystal clear.

Obama & Obama Sr. Marxist

Obama & Lolo Soetoro Marxist

Obama & Frank Marshall Davis Marxist/rapist/pedophile

Obama & Jeremiah Wright Marxist/Black Supremist

Obama & Bill Ayers Marxist/Maoist/Bomber

Obama & Bernadette Dohrn Marxist/Maoist/Murderess

Obama & Tom Ayers Traitor/Chicago Gangster

Obama & Rezko/Nadhmi Auchi Gangster/Criminal Financier

Obama & Raila Odinga Insane Islamist Murderer

Obama & Mike Klonsky Maoist/Societal agitator

Obama & ACORN Societal Agitators/thugs

And on and on and on and on. Every one of them are haters of America. Please note, haters of America, is not to be vocalized with the same tone and timbre as ‘evildoers’. What I mean is guys who hate this country. They hate capitalism and everything it stands for. They either have no concept of the US Constitution or do not care for it’s content and are/were perfectly willing to subvert it and destroy it at every turn. As a factual matter, the vast majority of his associates and associations have indeed been extreme left-wing radicals.

And for anyone in this day and age to lecture Americans on the legitimacy or effectiveness of socialism is laughable. It is nothing more than Communism-light, the rot of the world. It has given humans the greatest number of mass murder and more misery than any other form of government.

So, Mr Z, you are speaking an assumption. Your are toting Obama's freshly minted talking point, the same one I alluded to earlier. He's warning everyone of smears to come. What he doesn't let the people know is that it is true. Simply the truth.

Z - I know that Joe Biden's been around for decades, went through the primary process, and is pretty much an open book, but I'm curious if he's done any 1 on 1 interviews himself lately on recent events... It might be easy to answer this myself by searching the web, but I'm kinda lazy. : - )

People who call Obama "Terrorist" = RACIST

Is it christianity to give rumors against Barack Obama? It is a sin. To me he seems to be a family man and a wonderful husband. We have a bunch of hyprocrites out there. Shame on you all! He is definitely qualified to become president.

Hannity and his ilk have so riled up the wing nuts in the repub base that some very responsible retired republicans have gone on the record to protest the direction that the campaign is going.
The problem is that McCain's campaign folks only know how to run this kind of campaign.
I saw today that McCain finally tried to back pedal but his supporters booed him.
McCain has sold out to the neo-cons and will not get elected for that reason.
I don't think he would have made a good president with all these financial troubles but he has done some very good things as a senator so it is sad to see him ending his career on this kind of note.

I'm tired of the rascists who hide behind their computer monitors calling Obama a terrorist. They don't have the guts to admit they would never be comfortable with a Black President. Just like John McCain didn't have the guts to recite this nonsense to Obama's face. JOHN MCCAIN IS NO WAR HERO IN MY EYES. BASICALLY HE HAS PUT A BOUNTY ON OBAMA'S HEAD WITH ALL THIS HATE SPEECH. He better hope like hell Obama doesn't get assassinated, because it would turn this country upside down and set it back at least 50 years. And yes I would blame McCain for it. Grow up Mr. McCain and admit you're losing this election fair and square. And tell your sidekick Sarah Palin, to keep her legs crossed, stay loyal to her husband, take care of her family and stop firing people for no reason.

Dr. Z, seems you have created a firestorm based on your observations. Thank God (Yes you Right-Wingers we believe in some sort of supreme being, not some white dude painted by Michaelangelo) these people who have assaulted you don't have the cjance to pick up the "Red-Phone" in the Oval Office. God, it scares me that the twit from the North might have the chance - talk about armeggedon!

JB

Hi JB: You are a voice of sanity and wisdom. Thanks. Z

Z is an aXXXXXXX

Nice article, Hannity has got into his own world in the past year. I don't watch any parts of H&C where the guest will only go on with Shawn or Alan. It just tells me that person is not up to my standards if he or she is afraid to go on with H&C together.

That said I am sure you applied the same standards when the 3rd rate hack Olbermann had his 'Chapstick' interview with Obama.

Remembering of course Hannity has made it known that he is a 'Conservative Commentator'. And Olbermann has has called himself a 'Journalist' and I believe the next Edward R. Murrow?

So who really hits the lows night after night Mr. Zurawik?

While Hannity might have hit one out of 'Lowland Stadium'. Olbermann bats for average.

Dr. Mr Puck30, If you will take two minutes to read back through the September archive of Z on TV, you will see at least two piece ripping Olbermann for being the same kind of partisan and ideologue as O'Reilly and Hannity. I did, in fact, apply excatly the same standards. So, why don't you read what I have written about Olbermann, and then write back and tell me what you think. But don't trust me. Go to the newsbusters conservative Web site, and see what Tim Graham said about what I wrote about Olbermann. Do some research. Get some facts. It will make the attitude seem a lot less empty headed and hot dog. But I am guessing you will not do any that. Nor will you write back and say you were wrong. Thanks. Z

Maybe Fox can bring out McCains association with John Hagee the anti catholic preacher? How about the keating five? How about Palins association with the Alaska Independence party of which her husband was a member of. how about trooper gate? How about the republican parties association with Bob Jones, a man that believes that races should not mix. We talk about these vague associations of Obama's but people have ignored the real associations of the McCain Palin ticket.

People ARE angry on the right side of the aisle not because they want McCain as President, they just know they don't want Obama. To have a great positive campaign, you must have people really get behind a candidate. To some extent, the Liberal base and some younger voters have done this for Obama. Not to mention people like yourself Z who use forums such as this to do free campaigning for Obama, and get paid to do it. (I would spank you in a debate!) McCain is a little short on solid support. You might think it's wrong for people to be anti-Obama, rather than Pro-McCain, but it's simply how people feel. You could claim, as many do, that its race based, but then you would be judging people based on assumption, generally not a smart move. I can only speak for me. I am against electing Obama for a few reasons, not the smallest of which is how he bought his house. He calls it a "boneheaded move", and gee, America forgives. This man used his political influence to engage in a land deal with a felon and person reputed to have ties to organized crime, Tony Resko, so he could get a cheap house. What the heck, it's just a little somethin' somethin' right? Today I saw a Hispanic man, dressed very shabbily and possibly not even a legal alien, find a package of bacon in his grocery cart after he got outside that had not been rung up. He walked back inside and paid for it. Why does a poor person show a higher integrity than the man who would be President? Obama would be turned down for a Top Secret security clearance if he applied for a job with the FBI or CIA on his Resko connection alone. Like many congressmen, he can only access such information because of a "Political Exception". This is the man you would have act as Commander in Chief. If electing Obama is supposed to be an answer for people unhappy with Bush who want real change, I would say rather than making progress, you are going backwards. You could say many bad things about me because I disagree with you, but the truth is, what you have to say actually says more about you than me. It's good for you that most of the media is opposite of Fox, or you couldn't even get a job. I do predict however, that the day of the Liberal Media's power is soon to wane, it's simply been abused too much.

Thank You Sean Hannity!
Another gutsy honest job... WELL DONE!

I heard it said that if Barak was running for anything other than President, he couldn't get a security clearance due to his association with known terrorists. If this is true, why don't you want Americans to know it?
Those who don't know or care are about to make him President of the Free World..... Wake UP !

Hannity is a joke!!! The democrats have a hell of a lot more class. No one mentions McCain's wife's previous problems or the way McCain dumped his previous wife. AND there probably is more about McCain.

You go back and scrape up shit that happened when Obama was a kid and bring it forward... THE ANNENBERG FOUNDATION WAS A REPUBLICAN DEAL... DUH

Once again I'll say

People who want to call Obama a Terrorist = Racist.


If you don't want to vote for him that is your choice. But make it about something real, with substance.

But, If you are going to come onto this board and say Sen. Obama is a terrorist, but John McCain and Sarah Palin aren't, then YOU ARE A RACIST.

I am not playing the race card, I am playing the TRUTH CARD.

Conservatives are grasping at straws bending over backwards trying to paint this man as some sort of terrorist.

These same conservatives want to cry foul, when you use their same standards to prove their candidate is a crook, who has a running mate who was involved with people who wanted a U.S. State to defect, they wanna cry about a LEFT WING MEDIA BIAS.

Stop the BS. Let's call it like it is,

The people on this board calling Obama a terrorist are racist. And they are trying to hide their racism behind "legitimate" concerns, that somehow do not apply to the white candidate.

Sean Hannity is an embarrassment to our country, and to journalists worldwide. I'm personally humiliated not just at him, but at all the even bigger idiots who defend him.

This used to be one of the greatest countries in the world- look at us now. Ask yourself why.

We live in the wake of a Republican mess. Clean it up- with your vote.

Verdict:

Barack Obama is surrounded by too many unanswered questions.

I don't care how the truth comes out, if he doesn't want to come clean to the american people, then he shoudn't be in office.

Things liberals don't want to tell you:

1) Bush didn't declare war; In fact, only congress can.
2) The ownership of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was not only under their watch, but due in large part to their policies.
3) God gives us our rights, not government.
4) They WANT gas prices high to stall growth.
5) The President sets the budget, Congress has been approving it.
6) This 'evil' NAFTA... Signed by Clinton.
7) Bill Clinton had some pretty interesting comments on Socializing the housing industry worked out.

Since some can't come straight out and use the"N" word "Terrorist" is the word.The meaning is the same thing...I was once a John MCain supporter but after last week...I'm done..

Oh my god. I feel really for the the few intelligent Americans having to deal with these right wing idiots who get all their information from Fox.

Maybe in future you could introduce an IQ test at the voting booths. If you set the pass mark at say, 70 you could elimiate the vast majority of Republican voters. Or show them a map and ask them to point to India or Brazil.

Do you know what a socialist is? Because I eally don't think you have a clue. As for Obama being a "socialist", why don't you say what you really mean. Go on, I dare you. No? I didn't think so.

So much information but no real validation. The biggest issue is what can we do if we as citizens allowed so much to go unchecked. I see the only time we really get involved is when it effects us( I mean individuals). What's going on now has been going on for sometime now. The American people again and again have took little or no time at all to look at the candidates. We tend to pick from outside appearance never digging deep for who they are and what they are about. Some people pick their candidates based on what their parents would pick or close friends. I challenge those people out there to go find out what racist really means and see if your choice for President was based on facts or fluff.

The people that keep saying that calling Obama a terrorist is equal to being a racist are grasping at straws... the two have nothing to do with each other. It is a fact that he has ties to known terrorists, that doesn't necessarily make him one, but he does have ties to at least one. I don't think Obama is a terrorist, I think we just don't really know where his heart is, who he truly is, a true Christian American? or a Muslim at heart who sympathesizes with the Muslim cause deep down, who has links to Muslims outside the US who have helped his campaign with illegal contributions, and/or who paid for his very expensive education at Columbia and Harvard... there are investigations under way to discover the truth.

I don't really like Mac much either, I think he's impulsive among other things, but again, I know where he stands and who he is. If Obama didn't have the shady connections to the Muslim world and radicals like Wright, and strong socialist tendencies, I would vote for him instead, it's not because he's black, it's because of what I said above. I don't trust him.

People who call Obama a terrorist = Racists.

It's not a reach, It's not grasping at straws, it's a fact.

We know as much about Obama, as we do John McCain. There are no questions about his past, that cannot be answered.

The fact that you can say that there are questions marks about Obama's past, but say with a straight face we know EVERYTHING there is to know about Sara Palin, reeks of a double standard.

Most people who read this blog never heard of Sara Palin before the 4th of July. But we've known about Obama since the '04 Demorcratic Convention.


What don't you know?

And why is it that you are SO concerned about these so called questions about Obama's past, but you seem to have no concerns about John McCain's ties with Rev. Hagee, or the Keating 5. And you will give a pass to Sara Palin's Pastor and his televised witch hunt, or her ties to the Organization that wanted Alaska to be independant from the U.S. How are these associations less of a concern for Obama.

And if you feel like you have a good enough reason to give McCain and Palin a pass, why not except Liberals reason to give Obama that same pass.

The fact that you can give the white candidate a pass, yet railroad the black candidate for the same thing, makes you a racist.

People say Obama is a Terrorist, but McCain isn't are racist.

If you REALLY feel like Barack Obama, a STATE SENATOR is REALLY a Terrorist, YOU ARE RACIST.

That is not a grasp for straws, that is a fact.

I want to make a small change to my previous post. Barack Obama is a U.S. Senator.

I would also like to point out that THERE ARE NO QUESTIONS about his religious affiliation. We know EXACTLY where his heart lies. The man has said time and time again he is a Christian.

The Racism comes in when people do not accept the answers that are right in front of them. Instead they will let their fear of what's different allow their common sense to be swayed by every conspiracy theorist and out and out bigot who comes along with a story to tell. All while giving the person who looks more like them the benefit of the doubt.

ChilePepper, I suspect you would fail both of the tests I suggested in my post.

If there was any, and I mean any evidence of wrongdoing by Obama, do you think Hillary would have ignored it? No way. She would have used it to beat him in the primaries. Do you believe that W has not been digging away with all the resources at his disposal to help McCain? All they have come up with is a rehabilitated radical, who was protesting against the likes of McCain bombing civilians, and a dodgy pastor. That's it!

The rest is lies and innuendo. Ask yourself why you choose to believe the internet rumours about Obama despite the fact there is no evidence. Not one bit. Why is that?

Z:

The ad-hominen attacks against you for outing Hannity as a neocon sympathizer are both sad and predictable. It's a special brand of ad-hominen attack that the GOP's flunkies use. Disagree and you're not a patriot. Find fault with the far right-leaning Hannity and you're a godless communist bent on destroying America (bring on the Patriot Act)!

It would be easy to brush off the false innuendo and outright lies (i.e. Andy Martin, that bastion of "fair and balanced" news, ratting out OB as a Muslim) were it not for the fact there's a general election that will oust the GOP/Neocon political machine. The stakes are incredibly high and the neocons sense their access to the money trough is nearing an end... hence the frantic attempts to blind Joe 6-Pack and ratchet up the hate.

I would suggest the neocons would post research that could actually be corroborated by fact. Of course, that will be a loooooong wait :-)

Hi, thanks. I think it would indeed be a long wait. The Neocon context is interesting. I had thought thought of Hannity strictly in a media history context that extends back through the worst of the Hearst Red-baiters in the 1950s and the Detroit radio priest, Father Couglin, in the 1930s. These guys are not new on the American landscape, we just have a short media memory. But thanks, you have me thinking about Neocons. Z

I agree with O'Hara. Neocon hate MUST be countered with fact: quick, factual responses to their accusations, and lengthier facts that offensively counter by juxtaposing their candidates in the same light, placing their spin machines on the defense. It sounds like a tit-for-tat, whining approach, but thoughtful discourse is not possible when the other side is merely responding emotionally.

Contrast Letterman's time with McCain to Hannity. Every journalist should respond to both sides with the type of questioning Letterman used. It is particularly important to begin responding this way to the hate-mongers if hate's power is going to be eroded.

When Letterman pressed McCain for discussing the other terrorists that O'Bama "pals" around with, McCain brushed it off by implying it was perhaps a verbal typo because, after all, there are "millions of words" exchanged in a campaign.

Letterman didn't take McCain's weak brush-off at face value, but instead, more powerfully, brought up McCain's friendship with G. Gordon Liddy, which is a friendship, not a mere acquaintance. McCain was cornered with his own weapon.

The thoughtful among us are fearful of that the Hannitys of the world are changing the terrain of political discussion. Letterman showed us another vision.

The lesson from Letterman: to McCain and Palin's many attacks, don't defend or explain, but instead be armed with their own discrediting histories. William Ayers is moot, merely an acquaintance, why is G. Gordon Liddy considered a friend?! O'Bama's associations with Acorn frighten you? He claims no alliance. Please explain the Palin family's association with AIF. When a question is not answered, repeat the question, perhaps numerous times.

It seems that the Orwellian state is ushered in not on the backs of the silent or apathetic, but perhaps on the thoughtful, who confuse being strategic with not being respectful. I believe we can and MUST be both.

One more Letterman reference: During the Letterman show, McCain made a joke about hearing every conversation "you" have. It was a scary comment joking with Letterman, but eluding to the power that right-wing conservatives are willing to use against YOU, everyday American citizens. Letterman missed a moment to ask about the privacy rights American citizens are or are not entitled to.

It felt like an important clue foreshadowing ominous events for future chapters of a story that is unfolding.

With the media being so heavily in the tank for Obama at this stage, is it really necessary for David Zurawic to whine so heavily about Sean Hannity's interview with McCain and Palin? Are you kidding me?

If we didn't have Sean Hannity out there getting the candidates to speak about the issues he got them to talk about, then all we would hear from is the Palin bashing left.

I quite frankly am sick of the media and the way they have portrayed the McCain campaign. I pushed the filter aside and watched the candidates directly myself. They are right and its not incindiary to tell people that Barack Obama is a socialist who has had questionable albeit not illegal relationships.

Hannity makes no bones about being a right wing conservative. It took Joe Plumber to get Obama to come out and be as honest as Hannity is about his ideology. This is America. If Hannity is proud to be a right wing conservative, then why shouldn't Barack Obama be proud to be a left wing socialist.

The sheep are being readied for the shearing and it looks like Joe Plumber was the first to go.

I am thankful that we have people like Sean H and Bill O
to represent the conservative view of Americans, I have a question for Mr. Obama, if waterboarding is so bad, what do you call parcial birth abortion??

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "u" in the field below:
About David Zurawik
I've been The Baltimore Sun's TV critic since 1989. My writings on TV and media have appeared in such publications as TV Guide, Esquire magazine and American Journalism Review. I have a Ph.D. in American Studies from the University of Maryland, College Park, and an M.A. in specialized reporting (on popular culture) from the University of Wisconsin. I'm the author of The Jews of Prime Time (Brandeis University Press), a look at 50 years of Jewish characters and identity on network TV. I have also been with WYPR-FM (88.1) radio since 1994 and can be heard Thursday mornings at 7:30 doing a weekly "Take on Television" report.
Most Recent Comments
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

What's on TV tonight?
Photo galleries
Baltimore Sun coverage
Z ON TV COLUMN • David Zurawik's "Take on Television"
(Courtesy of WYPR FM)
MORE TELEVISION AND MEDIA NEWS
 
Classified | News | Maryland | Sports | Business | Entertainment | Life | Opinion | Blogs | Twitter feeds | RSS feeds
About baltimoresun.com | About The Baltimore Sun | Tribune | Get home delivery | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Feedback