Sweet Sin's second liquor board hearing is today
Sweet Sin Cupcakes and Cafe's controversial plans to open a restaurant with a liquor license will get a second look at a 1 p.m. liquor board hearing today.
The Remington bakery, which offers gluten-free desserts, wants to open a restaurant and bar next door.
Neighbors appear to be split over the idea of a new bar opening in the 'hood: the Charles Village Civic Association is for it, as long as it closes a couple hours earlier than 2 a.m. But the Remington Neighborhood Alliance is against the restaurant serving alcohol altogether.
In July, the liquor board sided with the upset neighbors, and denied Sweet Sin a liquor license ...
As you may imagine, a restaurant without alcohol doesn't present the best business model. Though he was against it at first, owner Richard D'Souza now seems amenable to the idea of opening a restaurant with adjusted hours if he can sell booze. He and his lawyer petitioned the liquor board for another hearing, and will plead their case again today.
Liquor board chairman Stephan Fogleman, whom I spoke with this morning, is expecting a fracas.
"It's going to be heated," said liquor board chairman Stephan Fogleman.
If approved, the new restaurant would offer a gluten-free menu. No word yet on whether it would also offer gluten-free drinks. I'll keep you posted on the outcome of the hearing.







Comments
Cupcake hooligans! Just what the neighborhood needs.
Posted by: Frosty Frostington | August 12, 2010 10:13 AM
It took all my strength not to fill this post up with baking puns.
“Neighborhood residents are piping hot.”
“Whipped into a frenzy.”
"Mixing it up with the liquor board"
Posted by: Sam Sessa | August 12, 2010 10:39 AM
god forbid this tax paying business owner wants to open up shop in blighted remmington. there's been two murders within walking distance of sweet sin this year and they are worried about a bar?
Posted by: sonofboh | August 12, 2010 11:01 AM
I'm assuming D'Souza is the owner of Sweet Sin? You don't identify him in your post, Sam.
And when is this whole cupcake fad going to end? It seems gimmicky to me.
Posted by: Cardwell | August 12, 2010 11:20 AM
@Cardwell -- Aah! It was in an early draft of the post but must have been edited out. Fixed!
Posted by: Sam Sessa | August 12, 2010 11:35 AM
A few points:
1. Neither Sweet Sin nor the new restaurant are in Remington. Both are solidly in Charles Village.
2. D'Souza and his landlord, Goldberg, keep telling people they're going along with the community demands (including sending out an email and circulating a petition saying as much), but haven't actually signed anything, or contacted either group to negotiate, which makes their promises more or less meaningless. Aside from the hours, CVCA and GRIA are asking that they agree to keep the sidewalk clean and have a point of contact in the event that people have complaints about their business.
3. The CVCA and GRIA are both supportive of Sweet Sin opening a restaurant that serves alcohol, it's the landlord they're worried about. He's going to be co-owner of the liquor license, and won't agree to bar some sketchy individuals from holding a financial interest in the establishment.
4. The RNA is against everything including sunshine and kittens, so their opposition is like saying the sky is blue and water is wet.
Posted by: Ham Snadwich | August 12, 2010 11:45 AM
@Cardwell, yeah, cupcakes are totally over. The selling point isn't the cupcakes, it's the fact that it's a gluten/casein free bakery. As a Charles Village resident I welcome any new establishments, with liquor licenses or not. Although a bar/restaurant totally gluten-free including libations would be wonderful.
Posted by: Em | August 12, 2010 12:07 PM
since when is anything on howard street considered charles village?
its remmington
Posted by: sonofboh | August 12, 2010 12:25 PM
Sonofboh is right, Ham Snadwich -- it's in Remington, not Charles Village. According to our Baltimore Neighborhood map, it's just over the Remington line.
Posted by: Sam Sessa | August 12, 2010 12:29 PM
"Let them eat (cup)cake!!!"
Posted by: Michelle Brown | August 12, 2010 12:46 PM
We need Sweet Sin to succeed. Not just because I happen to be dating gluten-free, but because Remington needs more walkable options that aren't pizza. A liquor license would help. (And gluten-free folks aren't exactly party animals.)
Oh, and it's totally Remington.
Posted by: Patchen | August 12, 2010 1:25 PM
That's incorrect for two reasons.
1. The business address is on the 100 block of 27th, which is is Charles Village by any measure.
2. Howard Street *is* in Charles Village. Both sides of Howard are in the Charles Village benefits district, so both sides pay the benefits district tax. (Incidentally, that means Doug and Joan Armstrong, the longtime rulers of the RNA, live within Charles Village and pay the tax accordingly.)
I can't really comment on your map, not having seen it, but Sweet Sin is pretty clearly in Charles Village.
Posted by: Ham Snadwich | August 12, 2010 1:26 PM
@Ham Snadwich -- If you have a gluten-free cupcake, and I have a gluten-free cupcake, and I have a fork that reaches acrooooss the Charles Village line ... I start to eat your cupcake. I EAT YOUR CUPCAKE. NOM NOM NOM NOM NOM!
Seriously, I don't know if this was intentional or not, but Ham Snadwich cracks me up.
Also, as a reference point: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKQ3LXHKB34
Posted by: Sam Sessa | August 12, 2010 1:29 PM
Many neighborhoods have overlapping boundaries. Both sides of Howard Street are in the Charles Village Benefits District. Even if there was an imaginary line running down the middle of Howard Street that separated Charles Village and Remington, Sweet Sin would be in Charles Village.
Posted by: Think...about....it | August 12, 2010 1:45 PM
I'm dating myself, but back in the early 90s, there was a show on WHFS called the Daily Feed. Their field correspondents were Max Knobnee and Ham Snadwich.
The Lord can't hear you, Samuel. Say it to him. Go ahead and speak to him. It's alright. Down on your knees and and up to him.
Great movie.
Posted by: Ham Snadwich | August 12, 2010 1:59 PM
Hubby and I came down from Frederick MD to find the bakery and visit my sister. We sat outside and had a drink and cupcakes. Hubby is gluten intolerate so it's nice to get a gluten free treat. They sell gluten free pizza too..and have a freezer with gluten free goodies to take home. More people are discovering gluten free products as healthier than regular products. I say Go For It and Good Luck! (love the chocolate cupcakes!)It's 27th and Howard..
Posted by: Kathy Pearl | August 12, 2010 2:06 PM
Although I find the gluten free cupcakes from Sweet Sin to be almost inedible, I welcome and support the opening of a restaurant/bar on 27th and Howard (most of us Remingtonites consider that block to be in our neighborhood, but WHATEVER). We need more businesses in the area, so hopefully the Liquor Board will grant them a license.
Posted by: remingtonguy | August 12, 2010 2:21 PM
Arguing over neighborhood boundaries is petty, stupid, and solves nothing.
If you look at the location on the map, and check out Live Baltimore for Remington and CV, it's in CV.
That being said...
Who gives a flying...er...dog if it's Charles Village or Remington?
This is not the Bloods v Crips, MS-13 v 18th St, The Yankees v everyone else, or Sarah Palin v children's puzzles.
Is that going to aid or help him in the quest for a liquor license? Doubtful.
Posted by: Stagger Lee | August 12, 2010 2:39 PM
This whole thing didn't have to become so controversial. There were a variety of missteps on both sides.
1. Before Sweet Sin was involved at all, the owner of the Den did a bunch of improvements but didn't communicate with the community and then rumors started flying about how the Den was a bad neighbor.
2. Some members of the community (over-)reacted and now have an entrenched opposition to anything except, perhaps, an abandoned, graffiti-covered building.
3. Involving the RNA in anything is always a mistake. Their vision for Remington and Charles Village is a desolate wasteland (but with low property taxes).
4. Finally, the CVCA (who I am a member of and generally support) overreached. Their main concern was the risk of a future nightclub if the Den was involved but then they started trying to dictate (or at least complained about) everything from hours to menu.
Really, the whole thing has become personal which is a huge tragedy. Most of us in the neighborhood simply want a friendly, clean, viable restaurant where we can get a good meal and beer. I have faith that D'Souza can build this if the neighborhood doesn't throw too many barriers in his way.
Posted by: G Palmer | August 12, 2010 3:02 PM
I agree regarding the whole neighborhood dispute. Do you care if you get mugged in Remington or Charles Village? In Canton or Highlandtown?
Posted by: Cardwell | August 12, 2010 4:38 PM
Hey, looks like the license was granted! Everyone wins!
(except the RNA, but you know)
Posted by: Ham Snadwich | August 12, 2010 4:51 PM