Are $10 credit card minimums fair?
Yesterday, when I hit up Johnny Rad's, my beer cost $3.25. I looked in my wallet, and realized I only had three one-dollar bills (such is the life of a two-bit hack journalist).
Feeling like a schmuck, I had to give the bartender my credit card. To try and set things right, I tipped him two bucks in cash.
This would never have happened at Club Charles or The Ottobar, because they both require $10 minimums on credit card purchases. Ditto for Down the Hatch. I realize this policy is because credit card companies take a big cut of every charge a customer makes. From what I understand, the bars would barely see a penny if you were running up $2 and $3 tabs. But how do you feel about it? I want to hear from bar owners and bar-goers alike ...
I know people who are afraid of carrying cash -- period -- in some Baltimore neighborhoods, so they carry credit cards instead. But if they go to a place like Club Chuck, they have to buy three or four beers just to use their credit cards.
Lucky's, the convenience store on Fort Avenue, tacks on an extra 25- or 50-cent fee for every purchase made with a credit card under a certain amount (sorry guys, I can't remember the exact number, it's been a while since I was there). Why can't more bars do this, instead of minimums?
Forgive me if I'm missing a law that prohibits these practices (I was never good with math or law). But I think it's a fair question. Thoughts?







Comments
I can see a $5 minimum, because it does cost them to use credit card machines. But a $10 minimum is pushing it a bit.
Posted by: baltimoregal | August 4, 2010 12:16 PM
bar owners dont do it because of the fee as much as to prevent people from paying for every single beer each time with a credit card. If you run a 3 dollar tab its only costing the bar 10 cents or so, but its obnoxious when someone has 10 beers and they want to run the card every single time
Posted by: ryan | August 4, 2010 12:18 PM
I always figure the simplest solution is the best, which is simply to charge the customer whatever the credit card company charges the store. Station North Arts Cafe at Charles and North does that, and it serves as a subtle incentive to buy more at each trip - i.e. if you plan to go there for breakfast and lunch, buy them both at the same time. Minimums are dumb.
Posted by: Chris | August 4, 2010 12:18 PM
For Visas:
U.S. retailers may require a minimum purchase amount on credit card transactions. The minimum purchase amount must not exceed $10 and does not apply to transactions made with a debit card.
Posted by: Don't Leave Home Without It | August 4, 2010 12:20 PM
I've patronized several bars that have minimums, and my way of "making it right" is to buy a drink for someone who needs one over the course of the bartender's shift. Usually, that gets you a couple brownie/nice person points in that bartender's eyes, and the minimum stops applying to you.
The one thing i dislike is when it's shift change, and you're stuck. You have to order another one from your current 'tender to make the minimum, and then end up being ignored or sneered at by the on coming 'tender. Not a nice place to be.
I understand why because of the credit charge companies, vendor fees, and provider cost. They REALLY take a chunk, especially if you don't have a high volume of credit card transactions.
For business owners, I'd suggest renegotiating terms with your providers. They're not the only ones out there, and there ARE options if you're willing to invest an afternoon to find them.
Posted by: Meekrat | August 4, 2010 12:23 PM
The practice of requiring minimums is illegal. Period. The credit card company takes the same amount out of the swipe for a $1 charge or a $1,000 charge. To my knowledge the deal between credit card companies and vendors varies based on credit history (on that front, I could be wrong).
I say all this having worked in bars in restaurants for more than eight years. Many venues also provide ATM machines to alleviate this sort of issue. If you are afraid of carrying $10 or $20 in your pocket while walking around the city then how is it you feel comfortable walking home at night instead of taking a cab -- which would require the aforementioned $10 or $20.
Minimums are not fair to customers or even service employees who have to explain to bar-goers that they have to either drink more or fork up more cash at the faceless owner's request.
Posted by: Nick D | August 4, 2010 12:23 PM
Most credit card companies don't allow merchants to set minimums on purchases. So an establishment is likely violating their agreement with Visa, MasterCard, et al., in setting a minimum -- and the consumer can call them out on it.
Posted by: Gus | August 4, 2010 12:26 PM
I'm fairly certain that this type of policy is in violation of the credit card agreement with visa etc. But lost of bars do it anyway. It may cost more to process each card for whatever the amount but at least your not pissin off your patrons.
Also, not only is there the swipe and process fee... which is standard. They also get a percentage of the amount. Most processors charge 2 to 3 % of the check amount. It's a freakin racket.
Posted by: tomc | August 4, 2010 12:29 PM
Consumerist outlines the merchant policies of Discover, Mastercard, Visa, Amex, etc...
http://consumerist.com/2006/04/mega-update-requiring-minimum-credit-card-purchases-is-a-violation.html
Posted by: Alessandro | August 4, 2010 12:35 PM
pretty sure congress just passed a law making this practice legal...I think its perfectly fine for establishments to have a minimum charge, although my guess is it's more useful as a way for patrons to buy more than they planned to in order to meet the minimum than it is a strategy to avoid CC charges...certainly works on me when I'm out of cash.
I don't know why people are so indignant about it. If it's their establishment, let them do it. If you don't like it, don't go.
Posted by: direwolfc | August 4, 2010 12:36 PM
The new financial reform bill that passed last month includes a provision that officially legalizes minimums for credit card purchases, so now it's very much allowed.
That said, as a routinely cashless bar-goer, I think they're annoying.
Posted by: trainofbutter | August 4, 2010 12:40 PM
This has always been a point of contention with me. Technically Visa and MasterCard don't allow it. But the retail establishment really doesn't deal directly with them, but with a processing company. This middle man gives them enough cover to do it without Visa or MasterCard really caring too much.
Personally, if a retailer choose to accept payment for goods and services in the form of a credit card, they should bear all costs involved. Is it fair? Depends. A service is being provided for the retailer which they would otherwise be unable to do on their own.
If they feel the need to raise the cost of drinks by ten cents each to cover this, that's fine with me. But I think that it is bad business practice to ask me to supplement the cost of you doing business. Another way around it is to install an ATM machine and don't accept cards at the bar.
Gas stations get around the legal issue by offering a "discount" for cash. Why not offer bar patrons 10% off for paying in cash? I could even get around that. But forcing me to spend a minimum amount sucks.
Posted by: R | August 4, 2010 12:46 PM
“Visa's rules require merchants to always honor valid Visa cards in their acceptance category regardless of purchase amount. When cardholders see the Visa logo, they expect to be able to make a transaction without discrimination."
Mastercard has the same rule.
If a merchant requires a minimum I ask them to reconsider.If their answer is still no,then I leave and promptly report them to the credit card company,who will remind them that it is against their merchant agreement.
As for Lucky's,they are not permitted to add anything to a credit card purchase BUT they can discount for cash.
Posted by: FM | August 4, 2010 12:50 PM
I'd like to see places offer options, like why not try and up sell me to a gift card rather than send me out to an ATM to pay a fee to some random bank.
Posted by: Rob | August 4, 2010 12:51 PM
Lots of conflicting info in this thread's replies.
Posted by: The truth is out there? | August 4, 2010 1:04 PM
I got burned on a minimum once. I ordered one or two drinks and the bill was probably 8.50 or something. The place was a couple blocks from my house so I walked one of my friends home (intended to come back and keep drinking) but it got late and I never made it back out. I hate to do it, but I'll tip extra if I leave a card for the next day (and they typically say "last night's bartender will get the tip"). Anyway, the next day I go get my card and they charged me $15. Why? Because that's the minimum they can charge, was explained to me. Felt kinda ripped off on that one. I won't name the now closed bar, but it used to be on the corner of Charles and Fort.
Posted by: FHT | August 4, 2010 1:10 PM
Good discussion. Tiki Bar had a minimum of $10, but given the unique location/atmosphere and them hosting the Social, I certainly wasn't going to sweat it.
Posted by: Patchen | August 4, 2010 1:15 PM
Also, having an atm in the corner of the bar isn't a great alternative to minimums for people who rarely carry cash. These atm's are usually bank xyz which charges everyone $2.50 to use them. Add in a couple bucks from your bank and your $3.25 beer is now $8.75 after tip. I rarher just order an extra beer or two and hit whatever minimum they have. (Or carry cash, like I usually do.)
Posted by: FHT | August 4, 2010 1:23 PM
If a bar is really concerned about it why not just offer an incentive to use cash? Slightly raise prices to offset these "crippling credit card fees" and then offer 5% off your bar tab or something for using cash? This would make them seem alot cooler, and wouldn't turn any customers away. If I know there's a minimum and I don't have cash I just won't go to that bar.
Posted by: Nikc Miller | August 4, 2010 1:44 PM
I don't especially mind the minimums (which were illegal until recent), but I do mind the minimal swipe amount for tabs at some bars. Mcgerk's has like a $15 minimum-- like you swiped your card at a hotel and they put a hold on it.
My biggest pet peeve and this usually only happens when my people patronize establishments is both the non announced added gratuity and the "you must pay for every drink when you receive it." Luna De [Ahem] or whatever it's called on Pratt did both to me- not only made me pay per drink with a credit card--while by myself- and added gratuity.
Sam-don't bother testing this theory- it only happens to "certain groups of people" on "certain nights".
Posted by: Tif | August 4, 2010 1:58 PM
Wouldn't having three one-dollar bills would make you a 24-bit hack journalist?
Posted by: Cheap Jim | August 4, 2010 2:32 PM
@Cheap Jim -- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ytCEuuW2_A
Posted by: Sam Sessa | August 4, 2010 2:35 PM
why didn't you just man up and drink 2 more beers?
#FAIL
Posted by: double b | August 4, 2010 2:43 PM
I'm with double b. More beers is always the right answer.
Posted by: kateebee | August 4, 2010 3:11 PM
A $10.00 minimum charge is reasonable by my standards (beer(s) + shot). However I've been to some places where $25.00 is the minimum -forget it.
Posted by: Paul_D | August 4, 2010 4:25 PM
I'm a bit confused. According to the Consumerist, merchants are not allowed to charge a surcharge or fee for using a credit card, but they are allowed to give a discount for using cash. Isn't that just the same thing?
Posted by: Viraj | August 4, 2010 4:26 PM
The CARD Act passed in 2009 does not address interchange fees other than to call for a detailed study of their effect on small businesses and consumers. The bill on interchange fees in the current Congress is stalled in committee, I believe, where it will likely remain now that the larger financial reform bill has been passed.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-627
As it stands, all the card networks (Visa, MC and AMEX) usually prohibit merchants from "steering," which is just the industry term for coercing customers into using cash or some other payment method. That includes setting any minimum charge amount. To do so is a breach of their contract with the card network, although enforcement of this rule is obviously lax. I would guess many small business owners don't know the details of their agreement with the networks so aren't knowingly breaking the contract.
Posted by: kungpow12 | August 4, 2010 4:26 PM
Mr. Twain, what is the answer and where have you been? what is the final answer, there has to be a lawyer amongst us. Can bar say that there is a minimum and can bars discount a check if people pay in cash?
I have seen both things in Baltimore?
My favorite thing is when bar(s) use cash boxes and I wonder if they are paying taxes on those sales.
Posted by: anon;) | August 5, 2010 1:59 AM
Next time this happens you can feel free to buy me a drink, Sam. Or anyone else... Booze Karma is the best kind of Karma.
Posted by: The Baltimore Chop | August 5, 2010 7:19 AM
I don't mind, if I'm under the minimum when I'm closing out (which is rare), it usually means a shot to push me, and my tab, over the edge.
Posted by: Tom | August 5, 2010 12:45 PM
my god gloria, why next step it up and suck down one those manly appletini's your so fond of...
Posted by: Dr. Cox | August 5, 2010 9:16 PM
You could be like Captain Larry's, take cash only then have an atm that works about 10% of the time. No worries, I consider myself lucky if I get the drink I ordered in there.
Posted by: LGood | August 6, 2010 7:59 AM
Some restaurants/bars even pass this fee on to their employees. Forcing them to pay back to the restaurant 4-5% of their credit card tips to cover the surcharge. Which is completely unfair.
Posted by: Tony Ravioli | August 7, 2010 11:37 AM
Let me be the one to put it back on the credit card companies. I mean really, why judge ourselves on whether we want to pay unnecessary fees? Credit card companies are supposed to be making their money on interest. If the businesses and the customers joined together against the card companies, then maybe we would get somewhere. The longer we try to work around the problem, the longer it doesn't get fixed. Get ready, until then, fees will just keep going up!
Posted by: Steve | August 11, 2010 4:26 PM
As an bartender in a busy Fells Point bar I have to say, it is a huge pain and delays service to others when I have to stop and wait for a credit card approval on your credit card for your $3.75 beer. Everyone has to wait for you. If you pay cash I can jam through your transaction and get to the next thirsty patron. If is make a face, it is because each time I get slowed down, it cost me money. If you are going to hang around for some live music, run a tab. If you are going to bar hop, get a cash injection before starting or get some friends and buy rounds.
Posted by: mid-gruntled | August 13, 2010 9:19 AM
I'm pretty sure you can not set a min. amount on purchases, never could although many do. Congress passed where its legal now to provide discounts for cash vrs. debit, so hay make my beer slightly cheaper and I'll always pay in cash! :)
Posted by: Bob | August 23, 2010 12:54 AM
I'll take "Things I don't care about" for $500, Alex. haha, i can't believe this is still getting comments.
Posted by: kateebee | August 23, 2010 3:25 PM