The (unpublished) comment of the week
Back when I posted about how it's not cool to send in evil/wicked/nasty/eviler comments, I never expected people to stop sending them in. I just stopped posting them.
Then I got this comment from someone named Carl. It's so bogusly negative, I kind of want to publish it. Not under the original thread about DuClaw closing, but here, where it can get the attention it deserves ...
I think this blog is just a [female dog] and bash billboard. The comment from Brad is the only good thing I've read about any post topic I've seen so far.
This must be where all the losers and un-achievers hang out.
Sorry to have stumbled across it. I won't be back.
I'm sorry too, Carl. Because we'll certainly miss your positive presence here at Midnight Sun.
Cheerio then!







Comments
Sam, don't encourage him!
Posted by: Dahlink | December 31, 2009 11:09 AM
That was from your editor, wasn't it, Sam?
Posted by: JTK | December 31, 2009 1:18 PM
Woah, Happy New Year to you too, Mr. Grumpy-Pants-Carl. Here's to hoping someone got that guy a prescription for Zoloft for Christmas.
Posted by: Jenn | December 31, 2009 1:42 PM
Even stranger, I never even posted in the DuClaw thread.
Posted by: Brad | December 31, 2009 2:08 PM
This loser is none too happy about being grouped in with the un-achievers... wait. What the hell is an "un-achiever"?
Posted by: Abject Disaster | January 1, 2010 11:44 AM
What the hell is an "un-achiever"?
I believe that would be someone with such a poor vocabulary that he has to make up his own.
Posted by: Owl Meat G | January 1, 2010 8:04 PM
"Un-achiever" is a perfectly cromulent word.
Posted by: JTK | January 2, 2010 12:27 PM
JTK - cromulent? i find it a perfectly unacceptable word.
Posted by: karlosi | January 3, 2010 7:48 PM
JTK has embiggened this blog with his cromulent post.
Posted by: Jeff | January 4, 2010 11:15 AM
wow, hating on alleged haters.
that's a whole new level of hater-dom.
Posted by: ryan97ou | January 4, 2010 1:19 PM
ryan97ou,
Whatsa matter?
We should quit our vitriolics?
Why not slag the malcontent slug by slinging some Simpson inspired slang?
geesh!
Posted by: GDA | January 4, 2010 6:12 PM
ps: i'm noting the irony of the commenters own vitriol
i'm confused.
Posted by: ryan97ou | January 5, 2010 10:59 AM