baltimoresun.com

« Monday Afternoon Quarterbacking: Pho Dat Thanh | Main | Most popular story: gluten-free tasty cakes????? »

February 8, 2010

What good is a professional restaurant critic?

Thanks to Federal Hill Jim for giving me a heads up about this interesting story in the Columbia Journalism Review on what constitutes a restaurant critic. I wonder if Robert Sietsema is related to Washington Post critic Tom Sietsema. He's got to be, don't you think?
Posted by Elizabeth Large at 7:47 PM | | Comments (10)
        

Comments

So apparently Craig Clairborne is the culprit behind the damned stars.

I was cringing at the "man comes to women's section, professionalizes it and makes it be taken seriously" bit. However, there were some very good points there, and I've been a bit concerned by a lot of the food blogging I've seen. Here, Elizabeth has been very clear about how she reviews, and if one hangs around, you can get a feel for which of the regulars like what kind of things. But there are some really unethical, thoughtless people out there saying bizarre things about restaurants.

But there are some really unethical, thoughtless people out there saying bizarre things about restaurants.

I wish it were only restaurants.

I draw a distinction between critic and reviewer. A critic must bring a body of knowledge to bear on her subject, a reviewer may bring nothing, not even sensibility. Each will be judged on reliability or entertainment value or whatever readers value. Much the same can be said of restaurants and books. If I want literary criticism, I'll pick up Agee. If I want a good read, I'll check with JoAnne Schmitz. Ergo, Sietsema's undies are in a bunch for nothing. That's a review, of course, not a criticism.

9:32 is link spam.

And I'm with you, bra1nchild.

Tom Sietsema gets asked all the time on his WaPo chats about Robert Sietsema, and consistently states that they are not related. Which has got to be one of the most bizarre, if utterly trivial, coincidences in American life.

Hi Elizabeth. The two Sietsemas aren't related, though Tom admires Rob. Tom said so in a chat; what are the odds of two critics with the same unusual name?

For what it's worth, Lissa, I can't shake the feeling I've read this particular missive about Pauline Kael before.

To me, EL provides the right approach to restaurant reviewing for our fast-changing times. In the Sunday Sun, she provides a professional asessment, based on her experience and expertise. Here at D@L, readers are welcome to praise, bash, question and otherwise opine on local eateries to our non-pro hearts' content. Both are equally valuable in helping us decide where to go to dinner (presuming, of course, that it ever stops snowing.)

I just love it when jl says "ergo".

Post a comment

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About this blog
Richard Gorelick was appointed The Baltimore Sun's restaurant critic in September 2010. Before joining the paper staff fulltime, he contributed freelance criticism and features articles about food to area and regional publications. Along the way, he dispatched for short-distance trucking companies, shilled for cultural non-profits, and assisted in cognitive neurology research – never the subject, always the control.

He takes restaurants seriously but not himself, and his favorite restaurant is the one you love, too.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Top Ten Tuesdays
Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Restaurant news and reviews Recently reviewed
Browse photos and information of restaurants recently reviewed by The Baltimore Sun

Sign up for FREE text alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for dining text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Food & Drink newsletter
Need ideas for dinner tonight? A recommendation for the perfect red wine? Baltimoresun.com's Food & Drink newsletter is there to help.
See a sample | Sign up

Stay connected