Pay no attention to the stink on those Girl Scout cookies
America's latest food scare has me wondering: If you can't trust a Girl Scout, who can you trust?
A Kentucky bakery recalled one variety of Girl Scout cookie this week after customers complained of a "foul smell and taste," the Associated Press reports. The recall affects Lemon Chalet Cremes distributed in Maryland and two dozen other states.
Little Brownie Bakers of Louisville said on its Web site that the problem was caused by the breakdown of oils used in the cookies. No one has gotten sick and the company contends that the cookies, though "not up to our quality standards," are safe to eat.
I'm sure everything would have been fine if those oils had just been given the chance to break down inside our bodies.
Which must be great, since the Girl Scouts of the USA says right on its Web sit that it's "proud that all Girl Scout cookies are 'zero trans fat per serving.'"
Ah, the old per-serving dodge. A serving of Thin Mints? Four cookies. Those Do-Si-Dos or Tagalongs? Two. Two measly cookies! Not the whole sleeve. Eat that, and you'll have enough trans fats for a lifetime.
Mayor William Donald Schaefer downs one of the 21 cookies he tasted at a Girl Scout event in 1980. That's perhaps 10 cookie servings, though he's lived to tell about it. Baltimore Sun photo by Jed Kirschbaum.








Comments
My father threw away our box of the lemon chalet cookies two months ago claiming that "they didn't taste good, they were terrible." We chided him and rolled our eyes at his delusions. Apologies were in order. We should have been more understanding because Dad will eat anything.
I saw this story in the news two days ago and contacted the bakery. I'm expecting a coupon for a free Keebler product.
Posted by: NotableM | February 27, 2010 7:02 AM
Two months ago??, that's impossible unless he's been holding onto them for a whole year, GS didn't start selling them until the 1st weekend in February.
Posted by: jeroper | February 27, 2010 7:47 AM
jeroper, it's not "impossible". Each Girl Scout regional council determines the dates of its troops' cookie sale. You and NotableM's father may score cookies from different GS troops, and those troops could well have different cookie sales dates.
Posted by: hmpstd | February 27, 2010 8:09 AM
jeroper - Looking through my check register, I wrote the GS check on 11/05/09 which is when I received the cookies. Thanks for trying to embarrass me, though.
Posted by: NotableM | February 27, 2010 8:14 AM
fortunately, there are recipes for reasonable facsimiles of the most popular GS cookies...i know i've seen thin mints and samoas, and i wouldn't be surprised if there's a tagalong recipe, as well.
Posted by: falnfenix | February 27, 2010 9:14 AM
I have a year-old box of trefoils sitting on my ... well, I'm not going to say because it's too weird. Don't want to set anybody off.
All I'm saying is, hard as it is to believe, with a little willpower you can hold on to a box of GS cookies for a looong long time.
Not that I'd recommend it.
Posted by: jl | February 27, 2010 9:20 AM
well i think the thin ments have changed also. i have been buying gs cookies a long time and the thin ments tast like they got soap in them
Posted by: Bruce | February 27, 2010 9:26 AM
oy, two cookies? that's craaaaazy.
Posted by: hy silberman | February 27, 2010 9:42 AM
I use to work for hostess cake and you wont belive what we do to those twinkies just to make them taste good Girl Scout Cookies ...a great cause a great promotion Bless the child selling them. Shame on the bakery
Posted by: Dave in Seattle | February 27, 2010 11:25 AM
I think the "two cookies" reference was a typo. Obviously, the correct service size is "two boxes."
Posted by: Ordinary Michelle | February 27, 2010 11:38 AM
I don't think a recall is necessary for something as small as cookies. If the Lemon Chalet Creme had four wheels (and this wouldn't be a bad name for a luxurious convertible), then the recall might be justified. Otherwise,... that's the way the cookie crumbles, folks. Swallow your misfortune, and savor your thin mints. --Marilyn
Posted by: Marilyn Annucci | February 27, 2010 11:49 AM
Samoas!
Posted by: Dahlink | February 27, 2010 11:56 AM
Maybe they have pine nuts in them.
Seriously, my captcha is "pralines of"
Posted by: Trixie | February 27, 2010 1:33 PM
Um, I ate a whole box of Lemon Chalet's yesterday....
Posted by: EmilyN | February 27, 2010 3:24 PM
Hate crime!
Posted by: Lemon Girl – Blog Tart | February 27, 2010 3:29 PM
Trixie!!! A whole box!?? Are you posting from the bathroom? Yikes!
Posted by: Crunkie | February 27, 2010 8:44 PM
Okay, here's a weird coinky-dink. The ad box to the right had an ad for Omaha Steak Cakes, in particular Lemon Lava cakes.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B001G5J7L6/ref=twister_dp_update?ie=UTF8&childASIN=B000PKL630
Question: who would buy cakes from Amazon.com made by Omaha Steaks? Pas moi.
Posted by: Lemon Girl – Blog Tart | February 27, 2010 9:44 PM
Careful there, Crunkie. That wasn't Trixie who ate the whole box--it was EmilyN.
Posted by: Dahlink | February 28, 2010 7:35 AM
Lemon Girl, I saw the Amazon ad box with Omaha Steaks cakes, although Lemon Lava wasn't featured today. I am concerned, though, by Amazon's noting that it has "1 Used & new" of each item -- somehow, getting used Omaha Steaks products through Amazon doesn't sound that appealing.
Posted by: hmpstd | February 28, 2010 7:48 AM
Recipe for a hot summer's day:
hot steamed crabs
GS Thin Mints straight from the freezer.
Ahh!
Posted by: bra1nchild | February 28, 2010 8:05 AM
do-si-dos and tagalongs are my favorite. peanut butter makes everything taste better:)
Posted by: NotableM | February 28, 2010 9:20 AM
You all don't get it--Girl Scout Cookies help girls think like business owners, and teaches self reliance--no need to go to mommy and daddy for a hand out to pay for your activities----they earn it through cookie sales. If you want to complain about cookies talk to the elf.
Posted by: Nancy | February 28, 2010 10:54 AM
Girl Scout Cookies help girls think like business owners
Tell that to the neverending stream of parents asking me at work to buy their kids GS cookies, candy bars for band uniforms, pizza kits for whatever, wrapping paper, etc etc. Seems more like strong-armed welfare at times. And responsible business owners care about the quality of their product.
Posted by: basta | February 28, 2010 11:17 AM
Nancy - I don't think anyone was bashing the GS organization itself. I really don't see any negative comments directed to the GS.
Posted by: Trixie | February 28, 2010 1:46 PM
Oh, and Crunkie, eating a whole box of GS cookies in one day is not necessarily an impossibility for me ; )
Posted by: Trixie | February 28, 2010 2:03 PM
Poor kids!! I wonder who is going to pick up the cost of this faux pas. If a box is returned, the troop is usually the one that pays and ultimately the girls. Hopefully, they didn't sell too many of those. Another topic, but related. If a child comes to your door selling, make sure they have a parent with them. I always went with my daughter and still she attracted a stalker. This is something we have had to deal with for several years now. This man has been able to slip under the wire of detection in several incidents (not all involving our daughter) in our area. Please help watch these kids. If a strange car appears to be following, address that as well. It might be a parent, or it might not. Thank you!!!
Posted by: Gracie | February 28, 2010 2:50 PM
I have a question. If it's zero trans fat per serving, doesn't that mean that no matter how many servings you eat, it's still zero trans fat? Zero x anything = zero. So, I don't understand the complaint about that particular fact.
Posted by: Matt | February 28, 2010 3:41 PM
I am helping
my niece, who is a Girl Scout.
We are helping the children learn skills
they will need for a life time and the
cookies are super!!
Posted by: Big Mother | February 28, 2010 3:47 PM
It is an interesting question as to whom is selling Girl Scout cookies. How many cookies are sold by actual scouts going door to door and setting up tables in public places, and how many cookies are sold by parents selling their coworkers a few boxes.
Posted by: Robert of Cross Keys | February 28, 2010 3:59 PM
Matt, 0 isn't 0.0000. In this case, zero means anything up to 0.5 grams per serving. Anything with partially hydrogenated Franken-oil has artificial trans-fats in them.
Posted by: Owl Meat Gravy | February 28, 2010 4:02 PM
RoCK, I think you already know the answer to your question, as does anybody who works in an office. It's not exactly teaching capitalism. I would speculate more but I can't take another beating by little girls.
It would be a lot less profitable but more instructive if the girls actually sold them themselves like in the olden days when you were a kid.
"Local troops get about 10-15 percent of the price paid, the council takes more than 50 percent, and the manufacturer gets the remainder." (Source: Wiki)
Posted by: Owl Meat Gravy | February 28, 2010 4:24 PM
Sometimes I know the answer to a question, but I'm hoping someone will lie to me. Like when I ask my wife if I'm losing weight.
Posted by: Robert of Cross Keys | February 28, 2010 5:36 PM
Owl, you know you love being beaten up by the girls.
And here's a special Captcha just for you: notice macrons
Posted by: Dahlink | February 28, 2010 6:52 PM
Owl, you know you love being beaten up by the girls.
Yes, I'm grateful for any attention.
Posted by: Owl Meat Gnu | February 28, 2010 7:15 PM
"zero means anything up to 0.5 grams per serving"
I see, "zero" != zero. Very sneaksy, they is.
Fortunately I bought none of the cookies in question. I can enjoy all of my partially hydrogenated Franken-oil without any unusual smells.
Posted by: Matt | February 28, 2010 7:48 PM
"zero means anything up to 0.5 grams per serving." the gov has loop holes in laws so they can say that any products that have less then.5 grams of trans fats have 0 grams of trams fat... the us gov working tirelessly to make rules like;
0 does not = 0
Posted by: j ashley | February 28, 2010 10:45 PM
I had my daughter camp out at work durning winter break last year selling cookies to my co-workers. This year, they found me. We go door to door to neighbors that we know, AND we are selling at booths. Yes, people hit up friends at work, but part of that is due to societal changes. How many people actually know their neighbors anymore?
Posted by: cookiemom | March 1, 2010 1:16 PM
Big Mother, your haiku didn't work.
Posted by: sean | March 1, 2010 1:27 PM
JEROPER: Some states sold them earlier. Kentucky, Illinois and Missouri for instance are spaced apart, and I was able to buy Illinois cookies way before I picked my Missouri ones up today. Just for your info!
Posted by: Sassy | March 2, 2010 10:01 AM
Actually, troops receive a bit more of the cookie $ than posted above, although it does vary slightly council to council. And the council does pour the majority of the profits directly into programs for the girls, as Girl Scouts is a non-profit organization. As the Mom of a Scout, I am thrilled to be able to send my daughter to a fantastic week-long summer camp for about $275-$375, depending on the program. Many comparable "private" camps would be many times that cost. And her troop uses the $ earned to do many activities and trips the girls would not have the opportunity to do otherwise.
In my council this is the breakdown for a box of cookies at $3.50 (it's about 26% for troops/local service units, 24% back to the baker, 50% to the local council-of that 43% is used for girl programs and 7% for admin/training/building costs):
Annual Cookie Sale: Project Income Distribution:
90¢ - Troop and Service Unit Profits and
Incentives
25¢ - Camp Program
05¢ - Financial Partnership for Girls
85¢ - Cookie Cost
06¢ - Training and Support to Volunteers
10¢ - Council Administration
$1.20 - Girl Programs
09¢ - Program and Technology Center
Posted by: Shan | March 3, 2010 12:45 AM
I stumbled here looking for a source for GS cookies --which I haven't had for a couple years. Your comments, back-and-forths, etc. are a blast. Thanks for making me smile. Now, if we could get our elected officials to take things as seriously as you folks take your cookies, Oh! What a a wonderful world that would be. Ciao!
Posted by: John | March 3, 2010 1:40 PM
John, stick around and you'll be constantly entertained, infuriated, amused, disgusted, intrigued, and informed!
Posted by: sean | March 3, 2010 1:46 PM
Thanks, Sean. I just might.
Posted by: John | March 3, 2010 1:54 PM
Welcome, John. Please come back for Cage Match Thursday.
Posted by: Owl Meat Gravy | March 3, 2010 2:04 PM
Thanks for the invite, Owl Meat Gravy but I rarely accept invites or anything else from macho guys like you who get beat up by Little Girls. :-)
Posted by: John | March 3, 2010 2:23 PM
Oh, it's on John! Arrrrrr.....!!! Your first task is to come up with a cool blog name and then prepare for a cage match of metaphors, puns and veiled insincere threats. Or you can eat cookies while the Girl Squad taunts me until I cry. I hear Hyacinth Girl has some particularly biting insults about my outdated footwear and ceramic figurine collection.
Posted by: Owl Meat GirlyMachoMan | March 3, 2010 2:38 PM
Welcome John. And you don't have to change your name, it's kind of refreshing to have someone else around here with a normal name.
Posted by: Leonora | March 3, 2010 2:44 PM
John has been paying attention! Welcome!
And Captcha likes him, too: homaging Mr
Posted by: Dahlink | March 3, 2010 2:49 PM
Yep.
Posted by: sean | March 3, 2010 2:49 PM
Thanks ALL for the neighborly welcomes, especially Leonora, who like Sean and I, seems to be the only other person around here not on some wanted list and, therefore, afraid to use their real name. Note to Owl Meat: I was not ridiculing your inability to defend yourself from the Diminutive Distaff Darlings; afterall, I have two sisters who, forty-years-on, still make me but their lunch!
Posted by: John | March 3, 2010 5:01 PM
Welcome John, from another "almost" real name user!
Posted by: Joyce W. | March 3, 2010 5:17 PM
You can't be too sure of anything here, John. Apparently I might be you. It's dizzying.
Suspension of disbelief is crucial to your enjoyment here. Think of it as a one-character novel (LV) with hundreds of unreliable narrators. If you take things too seriously, you will end up muttering to yourself and swatting at imaginary bats with a broom.
The little kicks just make me stronger. Besides, why kick against the Girl Scouts, better to submit. [extra points if you get the reference]
Posted by: Owl Meat Gravy | March 3, 2010 5:27 PM
OMG - Voice of Reason...Prince of Absurdistan.
Posted by: Michelle Brown (NotableM) | March 3, 2010 5:45 PM
You forgot Servant of Dionysus
Posted by: Owl Meat Gravy | March 3, 2010 5:51 PM
Hi, Joyce W. Nice to meet another real person here... and to be treated to a refresher course by Edith Hamilton (aka: Owl Meat Gravy, aka: Eagle Etoufee Glace).
And, please, tell me: Am I hooked on this blog or can I simply walk away?
Posted by: John | March 3, 2010 8:26 PM
Oh John, please don't walk away! Anyone who wants to talk Edith Hamilton is more than welcome here.
Contra stimulum calcas
Posted by: Laura Lee | March 3, 2010 10:32 PM
John, if you can walk away, you are a stronger person than I am!
But all-knowing Captcha says "unsold expulsion"
Posted by: Dahlink | March 4, 2010 6:42 AM
Sorry John, once you enter, you are sucked in to this great vortex known as D@L. Welcome by the way!
"this boggled", yeah, usually.
Posted by: Trixie | March 4, 2010 9:24 AM
Note to myself: those bats aren't real.
Posted by: Richard | March 4, 2010 9:43 AM
Richard, just keep telling yourself that...
Posted by: sean | March 4, 2010 9:50 AM
And suddenly there was a terrible roar all around us and the sky was full of what looked like huge bats, all swooping and screeching and diving around the car, which was going about a hundred miles an hour with the top down to Las Vegas. And a voice was screaming "Holy Jesus! What are these G.D. animals?"
Posted by: Raoul Duke | March 4, 2010 10:49 AM
No point mentioning those bats, I thought. The poor bastard will see them soon enough.
Posted by: Anonymous | March 4, 2010 10:58 AM
Thank you, Laura Lee. Tho' your sage advice tests the limits of my Altar Boy Latin, I got the message but, being no stronger than Dahlink, am resigned to my fate! Perhaps you or Trixie can answer me this: When do the bats begin to reappear? And, Et tu Sean: You were first to see me ambling this way, simply in search of G.S. cookies. Why didn't you warn me?
Posted by: John | March 4, 2010 11:50 AM
Well, I tried...
Posted by: sean | March 4, 2010 11:51 AM
Yeah. Sean, you did. Glad it didn't succeed, though. You guys are really witty, friendly and fun. First time in my 10 years on the Net that I've "chatted" beyond my professional requirements. Off to the salt mines. Ciao!
Posted by: John | March 4, 2010 12:17 PM
Well, lookie there. See, everyone, we can all play nice!
Posted by: sean | March 4, 2010 12:22 PM
Aww, we made a new friend : ) !
Posted by: Trixie | March 4, 2010 1:05 PM
Group hug!
Posted by: Dahlink | March 4, 2010 3:58 PM
Personally, as a city dweller, I am delighted that parents sell cookies at work. Otherwise I wouldn't get any!
Posted by: spenyc | March 8, 2010 12:23 PM
i am so annoyed that i am just now reading this...AFTER almost eating an entire sleeve of lemon chalet and feeling nauseated!
Posted by: michelle | March 1, 2011 11:13 PM
I happen to know that he has no plans currently to relocate - just doing a bit of freelance stuff right now and has an IXIA cookbook signing coming up mid November.
Posted by: coach factory outlet | March 4, 2011 10:30 PM