Starbucks' new instant coffee: any good?
When I was in Evanston, Il. recently I saw a taste test of Via, the new Starbucks instant coffee, going on at all the Starbucks outlets. (It was test-marketed in Chicago, Seattle and London first.)
I was mildly curious, but not enough to try it, even though it's supposed to "transform the coffee industry." I remember when most folks drank Tasters Choice or some other instant coffee during the day unless they were real coffee aficionados, and I'm not particularly anxious to go back to those days. ...
It simply amazes me that Starbucks would be the one to come out with an instant coffee.
Now that the company has gotten just about everyone on board with thinking that you can't buy a good cup of coffee for less than $3, why undercut that? Surely people will stop going to Starbucks before work if they can make a great instant cup of coffee at home. Via is expensive at about $1 a cup, but not as expensive as a cup of brewed coffee at a Starbucks outlet.
I would love to know whether Via tastes as good as its name is a marketing gimmick. I totally missed it if the taste test went on around here, but maybe I should do a poll to see what coffee drinkers who have tried it think.
(AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)








Comments
Your post reminded me that I had three of these in my desk drawer ... just whipped up a cup and - you know, it's not half bad. It reminds me of a good, strong cup of brewed coffee. Not the best cup I've ever had, but more than adequate in a pinch.
Posted by: Dave | October 16, 2009 2:26 PM
Hi EL so I was sitting here at my desk thinking that it's been a long rainy day for me, saw this post and you reminded me that I picked up a little sample package that I've been carrying around in my purse now for 5 days. So I pulled it out and whipped it up. It's really not bad at all. I wouldn't choose to drink it as my regular cup o'joe but it will definitely work in a pinch!
Posted by: Kristen | October 16, 2009 2:28 PM
wow Dave, that was strange, my comment was posting while yours was... I like your style- "in a pinch"
Posted by: Kristen | October 16, 2009 2:30 PM
Do you guys work in the same office??
Posted by: Trixie | October 16, 2009 2:31 PM
I've had some sample packets waiting at home, ostensibly to take when I go camping (must. have. coffee. every. day.), but I haven't been camping at all this year. This weekend looked like it would be the one, until it didn't. (Thanks, rain.)
So now I have untested, possibly stale/bitter Via at home. Mmm.
Posted by: Multimedia Editor(ish) Mary | October 16, 2009 2:51 PM
Haha, Kristen ... those comments are eerily similar! Too funny, right down to 'whipped up' and 'in a pinch.' Is it possible that Starbucks Via is some Orwellian ploy to make us all think and write alike?
Posted by: Dave | October 16, 2009 2:56 PM
Mind control at work here! It's freebase coffee!
Posted by: Odie B | October 16, 2009 3:10 PM
I tried the coffee at a Starbucks once.
No thanks.
Posted by: MrRational | October 16, 2009 3:13 PM
I'm not a big fan of Starbucks anyway, so I probably wouldn't want their instant.
Posted by: PCB Rob | October 16, 2009 3:28 PM
How quickly they forget...
That's a hoot. I searched the Sun site to see if the paper had written about it while I was away, but it never occurred to me I had. EL
Posted by: hmpstd | October 16, 2009 4:56 PM
@ Multimedia Editor(ish) Mary
FYI- all packets of VIA are stamped with an expiration date. Most of which are about 9 months from now (well into 2010). So you still have plenty of time to taste- will not go stale.
And Elizabeth- you should stop in your local Starbucks. The "taste challenge" is concluded but more locations across the country are still offering continuous sampling and coupons, while supplies last.
Out to eat? Keep a couple in your purse or pocket and have a Starbucks cup of coffee with dessert- without ever leaving the restuarant.
Posted by: livin' la VIA loca | October 16, 2009 11:55 PM
Never thought about that now when I go out to eat Im thinking I don't like this coffee if I could just have a shot of starbucks expresso in it it will b okay now all the rest taste watered down to me. So I'll take a via in purse and make it right.
Posted by: Kim | October 17, 2009 7:31 AM
I like Gutter Magazine's take on Via
http://www.guttermagazine.com/blog/component/content/article/776-the-worst-part-of-waking-up
Fabulous. EL
Posted by: Sam Sessa | October 17, 2009 8:16 AM
It would seem that approaching the new product from the standpoint that it's some type of liquid form of hot caffeine, that it passes the test.
Specifics such as is it good are incidental.
Posted by: Joyce W. | October 17, 2009 11:25 AM
I tried it and it is pretty bad. It tastes like stale drip coffee that has been left on the warmer all day.
Posted by: MDP | October 17, 2009 12:10 PM
Baltimore has so many local coffee houses that offer excellent coffee, so I've only been to Starbucks once. The coffee tasted over-roasted. My favorite place is Jay's at the Towson library.
Posted by: Patricia Caldwell | October 17, 2009 2:28 PM
"I tried it and it is pretty bad. It tastes like stale drip coffee that has been left on the warmer all day."
Isn't that how Starbucks is supposed to taste? Maybe they did get it right then.. in that regard at least.
Posted by: MrRational | October 17, 2009 3:02 PM
i think that VIA is fantastic...it is such a great option for when we can't get back to a starbucks store for another cup of coffee in the afternoon. it's just like they advertise: never be without great coffee. if i have the choice of going to starbucks, by all means, i want to see my baristas--but if i can't make it (or i'm at my in-laws and they don't brew coffee, and if they do its folgers) VIA is great!
Posted by: a dempsey | October 17, 2009 6:25 PM
The pro-VIA comments are suspiciously one-note. I smell a locally deployed corporate shill campaign.
Posted by: AK | October 17, 2009 9:54 PM
Actually, Elizabeth, it's not a bad to re-visit the topic. Probably more people have tried Via since your first post, so now you can get a better read on it. As for me, as long as I can find reasonably good beans to grind myself, I'm not buying anybody's instant. But then, I'm not a big Starbucks fan--always tastes burned to me.
Posted by: Dottie | October 17, 2009 11:05 PM
I'm with AK on this. The people who liked it are suspiciously singing one song.
Posted by: Lissa | October 18, 2009 12:08 AM
I think AK and Lissa got it right , as least as to "livin' la VIA loca", who, according to a Google search, works at a Starbucks shop (location not disclosed) and is intent on pushing the instant product on unsuspecting customers.
Posted by: hmpstd | October 18, 2009 7:15 AM
Seriously, Starbucks' REGULAR coffee isn't even that good. It's just well-marketed and ubiquitous. Now a lesser breed of beast? Sell your stock. they've jumped the shark.
Posted by: Mike | October 18, 2009 7:16 AM
It is a shame. It was Starbucks coffee, via mail order, that introduced me to life beyond Maxwell House. Coffee went from a necessary drug to a delight.
I moved beyond Starbucks to other specialty roasters, then to roasting my own fairly quickly. But it was Starbucks that turned me into the single origin roasting coffee snob I am today.
Unfortunately, expansion changed them from a fairly ethical small business with a decent product to a huge, unethical conglomerate with a bad product.
Shilling glorified Sanka on a restaurant blog in a second tier city...Bill Peet must really regret the day he taught Zev and Jerry to roast.
Posted by: Lissa | October 18, 2009 10:06 AM
Less Via, More POSTUM!
Posted by: Robert of Cross Keys | October 18, 2009 10:45 AM
Since my evil employer won't sell coffee (well, real coffee anyway, you can get vending drek), I think I shall get some Via. I will test drive it for a while and see if waiting until The Man deigns to open the cafeteria is a better option.
Guess I better stock up on some Splenda and half and half too.
Posted by: Joyce W. | October 18, 2009 1:28 PM
oops left out the EE (evil employer) opens at 6:30 at one place and 7 at the other. I get to work at 5.
Posted by: Joyce W. | October 18, 2009 1:32 PM
The Man is the head of "the establishment" put in place to "bring us down." Though nobody has physically seen "the man," he is assumed to be a male caucasian between the ages of 25-40 and is rumored to have a substantial amount of acquired wealth, presumably acquired by exploiting those whom his "establishment" is "keeping down."
Posted by: Urban Dictionary | October 20, 2009 1:56 PM