Have you disappeared recently?
My brother told me a few days ago he posted a comment I never published. I hadn't heard from anybody else so I figured he must have done something wrong. (Sorry, BB.) But I just got an e-mail from Rosebud asking if the blogware was acting up again because several of her comments hadn't appeared. Anyone else having that problem?








Comments
Yes. I've had 4 or 5 comments not show up in the past couple days.
Hmm...posting may not be the best idea...
Posted by: Lissa | December 5, 2008 11:12 AM
I've had a couple of remarks not appear.
Posted by: Eve | December 5, 2008 11:15 AM
I posted a comment to the veg comment a bit ago and it has not shown up. A comment under gift certificates posted after (I think) did appear with the last round of updates.
Posted by: Robert (the Single One) | December 5, 2008 11:26 AM
me too
Posted by: omg | December 5, 2008 11:31 AM
I commented on a post the other day but it never appeared
Posted by: Jen | December 5, 2008 11:57 AM
I think I've had a post lost to the ether as well.
oh well, it was probably topic drifty.
Posted by: PCB Rob | December 5, 2008 1:52 PM
Ditto
Posted by: MD Canon | December 5, 2008 1:54 PM
I might have had some not posted. Sometimes I write a comment in Word, then tighten it up, then check the grammar in case Prof. McIntyre is lurking, then lose focus and forget to post it.
Posted by: Bucky | December 5, 2008 5:56 PM
And here I was just thinking that you were censoring the comments due to high levels of snarkiness.
Posted by: azgal | December 5, 2008 6:33 PM
One of the things that makes this blog so successful, azgal, is the lack of censorship. EL lets us handle it ourselves. She lets us make obscure comments that might be insults, references to bad 70's Turkish Sci Fi films or the Faerie Queene. So the snark, rather than getting buried and festering, becomes an occasion for binding, either with or against the snarker.
It seems counter-intuitive, perhaps, but the more a blog is censored, the deader it gets.
Posted by: Lissa | December 5, 2008 7:40 PM
Point to Lissa!
Posted by: Dahlink | December 5, 2008 7:59 PM
I've held this back long enough. Why are literate adults using idiotic archaic frat house slang like "snark". It really sounds retro-childish and lame. For Beelzebub's sake can't we stick to things in the dictionary and not sink into the morass of ancient adolescent and juvenile jargon? Really. The next thing you know, people will label us as some kind of puerile diggers of desert earth. McIntyre, can I get a what what?
snark (n.)
imaginary animal, coined 1876 by Lewis Carroll in "The Hunting of the Snark."
Posted by: owl meat grammarian | December 6, 2008 2:14 AM
See? Y'all doubted me. Yes, Virginia, there IS an Owl Meat Grammarian.
Humpf.
Posted by: Bucky | December 6, 2008 8:43 AM
Owl, I noticed after seeing Juno that a lot of middle aged adults were beginning to talk about their ... ahem "private places" as "junk". Now that just sounds so wrong!
and, as Freddie Mercury would say "Beelzebub has a devil put aside for me,for me,for me"
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 6, 2008 12:46 PM
"Junk" is old-speak. That's been around for years. You have to understand that all that teen-speak in Juno is totally fake, written by a 35 year old stylizing things she's heard elsewhere on TV. I thought the dialogue was overwritten, I could see the writer behind it all. Bad script editing. Tina Fey was using it on SNL years ago, which means it was already old by then. (As in having a baby ruins your junk.) Thoroughly unappealing term. I prefer to make up my own as I go along. I was going to refrain from riffing on that but, well, it's Saturday and I haven't been bad in a while so let's go euphemism crazy (as Elizabeth breathes into a paper bag...)
nah.
Posted by: owl meat junk | December 6, 2008 3:28 PM
Owl, in answer to your question about why "literate adults using idiotic archaic frat house slant", it is simple.
We ARE idiotic archaic frat house members. We write what we know.
Isn't that what writing professors always say to do?
:-)
Posted by: Cosmo Girl | December 6, 2008 5:57 PM
Speak for yourself, Cosmo Girl!
Posted by: Dahlink | December 6, 2008 6:37 PM
Owl, I won't misbehave either but once, my partner and I started naming every term we'd ever heard used for that part of anatomy (and for women only) and we filled a sheet of notebook paper. Which later, had to be destroyed so the kids weren't wondering what the heck That was. We started asking everyone who called or came over that day and we were in hysterics from some of the answers.
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 6, 2008 6:49 PM
We ARE idiotic archaic frat house members. Some us are, however, trapped in a pretend world where we are grownups.
Posted by: Eve | December 6, 2008 7:16 PM
Joyce, I would have loved to have seen that list, although I'm quite sure it would have made me blush.
That kind of slang is an entire sub-genre of fun. Alas, probably not the kind of fun EL wants us to have here, unless we can relate it to food.
No...let's not go there...
Posted by: Lissa | December 6, 2008 7:20 PM
Eve - guilty of the charges!
Lissa, it is pretty funny and yes some would make anyone blush, but no, not here.
Who wants to start a archaic frat house members pretending to be grownup group?
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 7, 2008 10:03 AM
No we must keep the blog chaste. I, however, would have absolutely no problem reactivating my abandoned blog for this purpose. So for puerile but witty eupemisms visit The Owl Meat Apocrypha.
Posted by: owl meat groinhammer | December 7, 2008 10:52 AM
Owl Meat -- it's about time you posted a new entry to your blog.
Posted by: hmpstd | December 7, 2008 1:04 PM
Owl Meat -- it's about time you posted a new entry to your blog.
I don't have anything to do on Christmas eve and Chirstmas day. Maybe I'll update it after I do some PM on my crossbows. I don't have any ideas for this Thursday yet, so my side blog will have to wait.
Posted by: owl meat goforit | December 7, 2008 3:17 PM
Good idea hmpstd.
There are a lot of things that I can do on my blog that I can't do here because the blogware is so much better. Plus I can post copyrighted material with impugnity and write about things that might otherwise cause Dear Leader to have a TIA or vanquish me.
For starters I added a new poll
Is Bucky Real?
Vote on the existential Bucky question here:
http://owlmeat.blogspot.com/
More to come ...
Posted by: owl meat gravy | December 7, 2008 3:36 PM
Owl, enjoyed your entries, dig deeper, you can even get more!
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 7, 2008 3:45 PM
Joyce, I'm afraid I could only join an archaic sorority house. Gamma Gamma Pyjama or something.
Posted by: Lissa | December 7, 2008 4:07 PM
Lissa, I guess I was thinking sexless and classless but why not sorority instead of fraternity - we could still be without class!
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 7, 2008 5:28 PM
Indeed, I fear that nothing could bring class to my life!
As for sexless, gods forbid!
Posted by: Lissa | December 7, 2008 6:15 PM
Joyce W: I'll pledge the sorority. I never want to grow up and get old, so I am ready!
Posted by: Cosmo Girl | December 7, 2008 6:32 PM
Owl, enjoyed your entries, dig deeper, you can even get more!
More "junk" entries and an AWESOME photo. Also added a grackle poem for Grackle Day. The Owl Meat Apocrypha lives again!
http://owlmeat.blogspot.com/
The grackle poem is disturbing and involves Wonder bread.
Posted by: owl meat galore | December 7, 2008 6:39 PM
Joyce
We should be thinking "sexless and classless", so how about a sandbox?
Posted by: LEC | December 7, 2008 6:40 PM
Shoot! I just now, reading Bird Blog found out that Junk in the Trunk doesn't mean, uh, you know....
Posted by: Eve | December 7, 2008 8:12 PM
Joyce W, I'm in. I never pledged for a sorority in college, but I'll by golly pledge for this one...too much fun not to!
Posted by: Dottie | December 7, 2008 11:24 PM
Lissa, I meant sexless of course in the way of gender not practice. I'm not sure anyone would join if that were a stipulation! Delta Sandbox Pi?
Owl, enjoying your junk in the trunk entries. Very imaginative!
Posted by: Joyce W. | December 8, 2008 6:52 AM