Is that seat taken?
I noticed when I ate at Lemongrass, the Annapolis Thai restaurant that's opened in downtown Baltimore, that it had not one but two communal tables.
Very trendy.
These are the large tables where individuals can come and mingle with others, only over food instead of a drink at the bar. ...
And for once, Baltimore isn't behind the times. As you can see from the photo, the Lebanese Taverna has one, as does Tabrizi's, and the Iron Bridge Wine Co. in Columbia. I'm sure there are others, and feel free to post below if you know of one that deserves mention.
The concept has been around for awhile, but slow to catch on. Restaurateurs like the idea because it's an efficient use of space. Customers, particularly younger ones, are more open to communal dining, particularly if they've been to Europe and seen it in action there.
I don't have much in the way of tips for you on how to strike up a conversation because I've never eaten at a restaurant's communal table, but I guess you could always start talking about the food. Maybe someone else has tried it and has something to add.
(Monica Lopossay/Sun Photographer)










Comments
One can always discuss the food critic's view of the restaurant. Always a way to start a lively conversation.
Posted by: Alan | January 7, 2008 7:18 AM
Bonefish in Glen Burnie also has a communal table. Bonefish is a chain, so I am assuming they all have the communal tables at the bar area.
Posted by: Kim Moore | January 7, 2008 7:35 AM
Ugh. Keep your communal tables. I'm just enough of a misanthrope (I know, my personal shortcoming, not anyone else's) that I prefer to have dinner with just my wife (and friends, on rare occasion) than with total strangers.
"I'll take that booth in the back, please!"
Posted by: Flipkid | January 7, 2008 8:17 AM
My mother worked at Karson's a million years ago and often talked about the "Community Table" they had there. Apparently it was very popular with businessmen back in the 60's and 70's.
Now that the communal table is back, let's hope for a revival of Karson's cheesecake!
Posted by: Lillian | January 7, 2008 8:43 AM
The center of Red Star's first floor is filled with one long communal table.
Posted by: KB | January 7, 2008 9:59 AM
Many Basque restaurants are 100% communal seating. As is Gritty's brew pub in Maine. I love the concept. I get tired of only having my wife to talk to during a meal and with my personality I don't have friends.
Posted by: Mark Knetzer | January 7, 2008 1:03 PM
I learned my lesson at Christmas. I'm not touching this one with a 10 foot communal table.
Posted by: Robert (the Single One) | January 7, 2008 2:22 PM
It's a horrifying concept. It's only for the restaurant owner to pump out a few more dollars per square foot. Look at the photo above: Zero elbow room. Zero privacy. Zero atmosphere. And, when your unknown neighbor grabs her cell phone the whole evening goes up in smoke as she explains to her baby sitter why the child may be throwing up. It's happened to me at a very expensive restaurant in San Francisco.
I've also been to a restaurant's communal table where my partner and I ordered a couple of extraordinary bottles of wine for our special event. Our unknown neighbor started the conversation by asking if he and his wife could taste it. We asked the waiter for extra glasses and passed the unknowns a generous portion. When they asked for seconds, we asked the waiter to hand us the check... before we had so much as an appitizer.
I'm a social person. But, as an earlier poster wrote: Give Me the Booth in the Back. And, Please Give Me Some Elbow Room.
Posted by: Stephen B | January 7, 2008 3:04 PM
They have it at Iggie's too. And Red Robin in Columbia. No big deal or trendy, I think. Never bothered me since we were never bothered at all. I would have nicely but firmly turned down the couple who asked for your wine - to me sharing the table with strangers doesn't mean sharing everything else. I'm surprised that they're more common these days since Americans absolutely love their own space (this includes me, but when I travel, I go with the flow).
Posted by: Eric | January 7, 2008 7:50 PM
The new Juniors Wine Bar in Fed. Hill will have a communal table (but it hadn't yet arrived when I ate there a few weeks ago). With the tightness of the tables at Pazo, I often feel as if that might as well be a communal table. In fact, that can be more awkward. At least with a communal table you don't face the un-enviable decision about which side of your mid-section you have to brush against your neighbor's table to get out of the bench seating.
Posted by: mike | January 8, 2008 9:26 AM
No elbow room, annoyingly loud cell phone talkers, people listening in on my personal conversations- no thank you. The few occassions that my wife and I have a free night to go out to a decent dinner, I don't want to spend it leaning in uncomfortably so the restaurant can pack in a few more customers. ugh.
Posted by: Dan | January 10, 2008 7:49 AM
We used to call then "counters." And the one at Woolworth's was the best place to have a quick, reasonably-priced lunch.
Posted by: Bob | October 28, 2009 9:24 AM