This wasn't as easy as it looks. What I didn't tell you in advance, because I wasn't sure I could pull it off, was that I wasn't going to include the popular chains that people don't even think of as hotel restaurants. That would be too easy.
For instance, Pier 5 Hotel has off its lobby both a Ruth's Chris and a McCormick & Schmick's. Shula's is in the Sheraton Baltimore City Center Hotel, while the Sheraton Inner Harbor is the home of a Morton's.
In fact, I think I've discovered a trend here, although I don't know if it's national or not. Not only has the grand old hotel dining room all but disappeared, but many hotels have simply thrown in the towel and brought in sure-fire winners so travelers will feel right at home.
So why should you care about hotel restaurants as opposed to any other kind? Well, they are often conveniently located, especially if you have out-of-town visitors you're meeting for a meal.
For this top ten, I think I'll rank them, and I'll tell you why they might be useful to you and what their strengths are. (As usual, it's not always about the food.)
In general, hotel restaurants get a bad rap for being overpriced and having mediocre food. That's not true of these if you go for the reasons I suggest.
Here's my list: ...
(Monica Lopossay/Sun Photographer)
1) Sherwood's Landing in the Inn at Perry Cabin in St. Michael's. I know I said I wasn't going to do boutique inns, but Perry Cabin is a large hotel in spite of its name. Chef Mark Salter's elaborate continental menu includes dishes like hazelnut- and herb-crusted wild rockfish with Italian lentils, wild mushrooms and a clam-maderia cream. Eat here on your honeymoon. Very expensive. (The vegetarian entree costs $30.)
2) Watertable in the Renaissance Harborplace Hotel downtown has been revamped to the tune of $3 million, so that the decor is now contemporary but still comfortable. The emphasis is on fresh, seasonal and local, and the food is quite good. The service wasn't perfect when I ate there recently, but the wait staff was so good-natured I didn't mind. I love the fact that every seat in the house has a great view of the Inner Harbor. Expensive.
3) Pisces in the Hyatt Regency downtown has a view every bit as spectacular as Watertable's. I like the fact that it's unabashedly a seafood retaurant, and I like the somewhat limited menu -- what the kitchen does, it does well. But unless you're on an expense account, you may well balk at the prices ($40 for crab cakes). It has a pricey but excellent champagne brunch. Very expensive.
4) Grille 700 in the Marriott Waterfront, Harbor East. Its dark wood and swooping curves suggest a luxury ocean liner, and the large windows open out to a watery view. There are brick oven pizzas, but most of the dishes are serious food: elaborately presented creations with a nouvelle Mediterranean sensibility. Moderate to expensive.
5) Spice Company in the Inn at the Colonnade in Homewood breaks the mold for hotel restaurants. The menu has dishes that acknowledge the global quality of today's American cuisine, like a grilled tuna with a spicy bok choy salad; but in general the well-executed food isn't too fiery in spite of the name. It hopes to attract neighborhood diners, so you will find dishes under $20. Moderate.
6) Azure in the new Westin Annapolis Hotel is a water-themed restaurant, in keeping with its Annapolis location, with lots of seafood and lots of watery blues in its contemporary decor. The 68-seat dining room and 150-seat outside patio both have fireplaces. The cuisine is American fusion. Moderate to expensive.
7) Brightons (pictured) in the InterContinental Harbor Court Hotel downtown -- with the closing of Hampton's, now the hotel's main dining room -- was uneven in both the food and service departments when I ate there this spring; but the romantic setting is so charming, even luxurious, it has to be on this list. The highlight of our meal was our appetizers, so maybe the way to go is small plates. Expensive.
8) Petticoat Tea Room in the Admiral Fell Inn is the hotel's only dining room now that True has closed. OK, pink walls and lace tableclothes may not be your idea of fine dining; but you can get a charming afternoon tea here as well as sandwiches, salads, homemade soups and homemade desserts. If you want more, go to Ruth's Chris in another of the chain's hotels, Pier 5. Inexpensive.
9) Cinnamon Tree in the Baltimore Marriott Hunt Valley Inn in Hunt Valley isn't exactly an undiscovered gem, but it's more likeable that you would expect. There isn't much in the way of dining outside of chains up this way once you get past the Oregon Grille and Milton Inn. It's a good place to take the visiting in-laws if you're in that area and want something safe but with a bit of flair. Moderate to expensive.
10) Crossroads in the Radisson in Cross Keys was once the Village Roost, the place to power breakfast in Baltimore. In its new incarnation it isn't as cozy, but it's still convenient to the JFX and everything it connects. I'm not sure why the place has lost its lock on the breakfast meeting set. I had excellent eggs with all the fixings last time I ate there, and my friend was happy with her Belgian waffle. Moderate.
Dear Ms. Large,
It is wonderful that you went to Italy and got to share your experience with us, but who cares? I for one want to know about the Baltimore area. I will never go to Italy. It is a treat just to go out here at home. Thanks but just stick to what the majority of us need to know.
Thanks
I totally understand this point of view, particularly as I wasn't talking about food as much as I had thought I would be in Italy. On the other hand, this was my vacation, so my choices were to post about my trip or not to post anything at all for ten days (I think of it as MY blog even though I'm sure The Sun doesn't, so I don't want guest posters unless I'm in Antarctica).
I'll always announce when I'm going to be traveling -- which I do frequently to California because both my daughter and brother live there -- so you'll know in advance that the blog won't be about local places. I do hope you'll come back to the blog when I get back to Baltimore and area restaurant news.
To Aden and Emily (see their posts under Happiness is away from San Marco):
I take back all the mean things I said about Venice! You are absolutely right, I would have missed some of the best moments of our trip if we hadn't spent three days there.
The two mistakes we made were to have a hotel so close to Piazza San Marco (I would love to stay south of the Ponte Accademia next time) and not to plan the trip so we weren't there on a Saturday or Sunday. It was much more pleasant Monday and Tuesday morning, when there were still plenty of tourists but we could move around in the streets. Also by that time we knew how to avoid the major arteries most of the time.
And just because I didn't want to stay near San Marco didn't mean I didn't love going back to it again and again over the three days.
Venice is simply such a fascinating city. I took more pictures there by far than I did in Rome or Florence, and that's saying something.
I also wanted to repost this observation by mdlvrmuncher, because I was whining a bit much about the other tourists, as he pointed out, when I was part of the problem:
"With all respect Elizabeth, you too are a foreigner. What do you think they are saying on their blogs?
I'm sure the same thing! It's hard on everyone. I imagine we all thought we were going a bit out of season. And the Italians must be sick of us.
Posted by: mdlrvrmuncher | September 23, 2007 8:21 PM"
(Photos of a beggar with a girl text messaging in the background and a Venetian glass shop by me)
(Photo of other tourists courtesy of Gailor Large)