baltimoresun.com

« iPad is no Kindle killer | Main | J.D. Salinger dead at 91 »

January 28, 2010

Reviews of Apple iPad and iBooks

apple ipad and ibooks

As Nancy noted, the reaction to Apple's new iPad falls far short of the upper-case WOW! that has accompanied the launch of the iPod and iPhone. Maybe it's because the device looks like an iPod Touch on steroids. Or because it simply combines current functionality -- music, video, e-reader -- without leap-frogging them. At least Apple got the pricing right -- a range that starts at $499 -- but that is still substantially higher than the basic Kindle and nook. Here's what others are saying about the iPad, with particular attention to e-reader capability:

Baltimore Sun -- [UMd. professor Ben] Bederson said he didn't think an Apple tablet would eliminate consumer demand for other e-book readers, like the Kindle, at least in the near future. The Kindle is a lighter device and geared specifically toward avid readers, he noted, adding that the full impact of the iPad on the consumer marketplace might take time to be felt.

Los Angeles Times -- It's hard to see the iPad as anything other than a mortal threat to Amazon.com's market-leading Kindle reader. Today you can buy a top-of-the-line Kindle, the DX, for $489. For that you get 4 gigabytes of storage, enough to hold (Amazon says) 3,500 books. ... For only $10 more, you can have Apple's entry-level iPad, with four times as much storage, a high-contrast full-color screen -- also 9.7 inches diagonally -- a dedicated eReader application that looks as if it will be less clunky than the Kindle's, and Web-browsing capability that the Kindle lacks.

New York Times -- Apple’s announcement that it was diving into the growing e-book business put the company on a collision course with Amazon. ... John Doerr, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who serves on Amazon’s board and is also an adviser to Apple, said there could be room for both companies, noting that Amazon sells many books to iPhone owners who use its Kindle application, which will also work on the iPad.

Wired -- Not only is the book reading experience better because the screen is in color, the iPad solves the Kindle’s biggest problem: layout and graphics. Reading a newspaper or a magazine on a Kindle is disappointing. On the iPad, you get the publication virtually as it was designed to be read in print, with extras like video and photo slide shows that you don’t get in print.

Posted by Dave Rosenthal at 11:45 AM | | Comments (6)
        

Comments

Besides the goofy name & the lack of a iChat camera I think a iPad makes more sense than a kindle.

For people that already have an iPhone, but need a bigger screen why would they not get an iPad? the kindle can't really browse the web, it's in black & white & u can't play video?

I wonder how Newsie for the iPhone will look on the iPad?

My guess is that the ipad will usher in a new form of content... the video dynamic book. My personal experience is that I have had a better learning experience when a presenter talks to me in video while I read the transcript at the same time and also see her presentation/power points/ graphics. This has the potential of replacing high priced text books and saving college kids a bundle. Teachers will be able to provide pdf files for students via the web.

The benefit of the kindle is the lack of a backlit screen. It's made to be an electronic paper & ink book. You can read it in the sun and there is no eye strain (you're not staring at a computer screen).


Seems kind of goofy to carry both a iPhone and iPad.

Wouldn't it be better just to buy a full bore MacBook instead? Or do you get a regular phone and an iPad? Oops!

Now if Apple gives iPad complete computing capabilities, that makes sense, otherwise refer to the previous paragraph.

iPad.
iLike.

No Flash = Good. I'm glad that Apple won't be supporting Flash content. I detest the way Adobe's Flash junk causes onscreen action that distracts from the actual content of the page and hogs the computer processor. I browse with Flash turned off to speed up web access.

Another thing that peeves me about Adobe is I had the name Flash which was the name of the Flash Magazine about desktop publishing http://FlashMag.com which I published from the 1980's, 1990's, etc. Clear case of them stepping on my name.

If Adobe wants CPU space they need to play nice. They should also not use the name Flash.

iSlate could be a PR disaster waiting to happen.

If there were any delays, how long would it be before iSlate became Is Late ?

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Map: Bookstores


View Favorite Bookstores in a larger map
About the blogger
Dave Rosenthal came to The Baltimore Sun as a business reporter in 1987 and now is the Maryland Editor. He reads a wide range of books (but never as many as he'd like), usually alternating between non-fiction and fiction. Some all-time favorites: A Confederacy of Dunces by John Kennedy Toole; Wind, Sand and Stars by Antoine de Saint-Exupery; and anything by Calvin Trillin or John McPhee. He belongs to a book club with a Jewish theme.
Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE nightlife alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for nightlife text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Edgar Allan Poe is 200!
All you need to know about the macabre master including Poe-themed events, photos, video and a trivia quiz.

Stay connected