Reviews of Apple iPad and iBooks
As Nancy noted, the reaction to Apple's new iPad falls far short of the upper-case WOW! that has accompanied the launch of the iPod and iPhone. Maybe it's because the device looks like an iPod Touch on steroids. Or because it simply combines current functionality -- music, video, e-reader -- without leap-frogging them. At least Apple got the pricing right -- a range that starts at $499 -- but that is still substantially higher than the basic Kindle and nook. Here's what others are saying about the iPad, with particular attention to e-reader capability:
Baltimore Sun -- [UMd. professor Ben] Bederson said he didn't think an Apple tablet would eliminate consumer demand for other e-book readers, like the Kindle, at least in the near future. The Kindle is a lighter device and geared specifically toward avid readers, he noted, adding that the full impact of the iPad on the consumer marketplace might take time to be felt.
Los Angeles Times -- It's hard to see the iPad as anything other than a mortal threat to Amazon.com's market-leading Kindle reader. Today you can buy a top-of-the-line Kindle, the DX, for $489. For that you get 4 gigabytes of storage, enough to hold (Amazon says) 3,500 books. ... For only $10 more, you can have Apple's entry-level iPad, with four times as much storage, a high-contrast full-color screen -- also 9.7 inches diagonally -- a dedicated eReader application that looks as if it will be less clunky than the Kindle's, and Web-browsing capability that the Kindle lacks.
New York Times -- Apple’s announcement that it was diving into the growing e-book business put the company on a collision course with Amazon. ... John Doerr, a Silicon Valley venture capitalist who serves on Amazon’s board and is also an adviser to Apple, said there could be room for both companies, noting that Amazon sells many books to iPhone owners who use its Kindle application, which will also work on the iPad.
Wired -- Not only is the book reading experience better because the screen is in color, the iPad solves the Kindle’s biggest problem: layout and graphics. Reading a newspaper or a magazine on a Kindle is disappointing. On the iPad, you get the publication virtually as it was designed to be read in print, with extras like video and photo slide shows that you don’t get in print.








Comments
Besides the goofy name & the lack of a iChat camera I think a iPad makes more sense than a kindle.
For people that already have an iPhone, but need a bigger screen why would they not get an iPad? the kindle can't really browse the web, it's in black & white & u can't play video?
I wonder how Newsie for the iPhone will look on the iPad?
Posted by: kaywood | January 28, 2010 12:35 PM
My guess is that the ipad will usher in a new form of content... the video dynamic book. My personal experience is that I have had a better learning experience when a presenter talks to me in video while I read the transcript at the same time and also see her presentation/power points/ graphics. This has the potential of replacing high priced text books and saving college kids a bundle. Teachers will be able to provide pdf files for students via the web.
Posted by: Ernie | January 28, 2010 8:10 PM
The benefit of the kindle is the lack of a backlit screen. It's made to be an electronic paper & ink book. You can read it in the sun and there is no eye strain (you're not staring at a computer screen).
Posted by: Reader | January 28, 2010 8:17 PM
Seems kind of goofy to carry both a iPhone and iPad.
Wouldn't it be better just to buy a full bore MacBook instead? Or do you get a regular phone and an iPad? Oops!
Now if Apple gives iPad complete computing capabilities, that makes sense, otherwise refer to the previous paragraph.
Posted by: Tom Stevens | January 28, 2010 8:27 PM
iPad.
iLike.
No Flash = Good. I'm glad that Apple won't be supporting Flash content. I detest the way Adobe's Flash junk causes onscreen action that distracts from the actual content of the page and hogs the computer processor. I browse with Flash turned off to speed up web access.
Another thing that peeves me about Adobe is I had the name Flash which was the name of the Flash Magazine about desktop publishing http://FlashMag.com which I published from the 1980's, 1990's, etc. Clear case of them stepping on my name.
If Adobe wants CPU space they need to play nice. They should also not use the name Flash.
Posted by: Walter Jeffries | January 29, 2010 5:41 PM
iSlate could be a PR disaster waiting to happen.
If there were any delays, how long would it be before iSlate became Is Late ?
Posted by: Ezine Articles | March 16, 2010 12:38 AM