Amazon relents, and Gaiman thinks the whole thing is silly
Kindle 2 has faced its first big controversy, and it's a draw.
After learning of the ebook reader's text-to-speech function, wherein the voice of a particularly dispassionate robot reads your book to you, the Author's Guild called foul. The Kindle 2 is supposed to be for e-books, not audio books, the group protested.
"They created a hybrid product," Paul Aiken, executive director of the Authors Guild, said in a Los Angeles Times article. "It was being used in a way they had not been given permission for."
So now publishers and authors can opt out of the feature, allowing those with copyright concerns to silence the device.
Meanwhile, Neil Gaiman called the guild out on his blog, saying that when you buy a book, you buy the right to read it aloud, have it read to you, even to record yourself reading it, and "without the ability to do the voices properly ... no-one's going to confuse it with an audiobook."
He certainly has a point. I know many people buy and borrow audiobooks just as much for the performer as for the subject matter. And no one is going to confuse that atrocious robot voice for a professional actor.
But I think this fight is more a reflection of the fact that technology has outstripped the traditional book, audiobook and e-book divisions.
Maybe it's time, as Gaiman's publisher suggests, to stop selling the rights to different formats as if they are entirely different productions, since more and more we're going to see devices that can provide not only those formats, but play you the made-for-TV movie based on the text, as well.
(Photo from Amazon.com)








Comments
I'm going to go with Neil Gaiman here. It's a computerize voice. Seriously. It's even less audio-book than a parent reading to their kid. I think this whole issue is absolutely ridiculous, along with a number of other Kindle related dramas... I mean, seriously...
Posted by: Biblibio | March 2, 2009 7:01 AM
I'm a happy Kindle2 owner, but I'm angry that Amazon caved on this issue. On the other hand, I must admit that Amazon was quite clever in making publishers and authors the "bad guys" who might remove the text-to-speech feature (a feature that I happen to love, by the way). And it's a feature that is absolutely essential to many different groups: the elderly, the sight-impaired, the disabled, etc. We'll see how it plays out. My message to ANY author and ANY publisher who wants to silence my Kindle? Hands off. The backlash you will get from customers may surprise you!
Posted by: Gail Farrelly | March 2, 2009 1:38 PM
I have a vision-impaired friend who bought the new Kindle specifically because of the text-to-speech function, and I would hate to hear that her investment is wasted. I think Neil is absolutely right. No one is going to confuse an ebook robot with an actual audiobook. The publishers are just being ridiculous.
Posted by: Lisa | March 3, 2009 8:49 PM