Baltimore's budget and property-tax rate
Add another voice to the running conversation about Baltimore property taxes, and how the city's difficult budget could affect them: Stephanie Rawlings-Blake's spokesman. Ryan O'Doherty wanted to share two pieces of information with you all.
First, the scope of the dilemma: The finance department says the city is facing a $127 million budget deficit next fiscal year. To put that into perspective, O'Doherty said, that's the cost of employing half the police force or all the fire fighters.
But he said Mayor-to-be Rawlings-Blake was serious when she said that raising the property-tax rate "would be the last resort." The first resort -- before anyone starts talking about tax increases, property or otherwise -- are cuts:
"We've got to show people that the city is serious about making reductions in areas that are not essential before we start having conversations about revenue," O'Doherty said. "I think city residents deserve that -- before we go to their pocketbook, we take a serious look at what we’re spending money on."
Any cuts come on top of what the city already reduced to deal with the effects of tax collections hammered by the bad economy and depressed home sales. As Julie Scharper reported:
The city has eliminated more than 500 jobs, including laying off more than two dozen employees, reduced trash pickups and implemented rotating closings of fire stations to tighten the budget for the current fiscal year. A hiring freeze has been in place since November 2007 and many capital projects have been put on hold. Government offices are set to close for five mandatory furlough days. Most of the unions that represent city employees have agreed to cuts, but the Fraternal Order of Police is engaged in arbitration with the city over reductions.
Food for thought -- and discussion.







Comments
I and I'm sure everyone else would feel a lot better if the examples and analogies used to describe the scope of the problem weren't always limited to police and fire (and similar pointy end) departments.
Try this analogy: $127,000,000 / $100,000 = 1270 (or fewer) executive level (and higher) positions.
More income tax from actually working citizens in decently paying jobs is the only solution; NOTHING ELSE matters.
Without those 100,000 employed and productive citizens **clamoring** to come to the City and to stay beyond their salad days the only other solution is to eliminate their cultural and social counter balance: the 100,000 worst service consuming unemployed.
RAZE the structures associated with the 6000 worst residential addresses. Just eliminate them in total from the conversation and by that act immediately increase the value of the next worse 6000 properties and make them almost good business to improve and appeal to those employed people the City needs to attract.
A few years later the ground those 6000 razed properties are on will have real appeal in it's own right.
Posted by: MrRational | January 20, 2010 10:25 AM
Let me predict the future. This is the way it will go down...they will say lets cut the fire dept and the people will say no way, they will say lets cut the police force and the people will say no way, they will say lets cut trash pickup and the people will say no way - looks like we will have to implement the last resort - raise property taxes. Somehow the idea of cutting homeless services, cutting low income housing subsidies (goodness knows we need to have at least 10 times the number of units any county has), or even doing something as simple as letting bars stay open later to collect more income - they will never even consider these. Business as usual in Bmore, put down the working man in order to continue the cycle of poverty.
Posted by: Tom | January 20, 2010 10:25 AM
"Somehow the idea of cutting homeless services, cutting low income housing subsidies (goodness knows we need to have at least 10 times the number of units any county has), or even doing something as simple as letting bars stay open later to collect more income - they will never even consider these. Business as usual in Bmore, put down the working man in order to continue the cycle of poverty."
Well put.
Survival Guide: Baltimore City
Apply for Section 8, get a minor injury doing something stupid and call it disability. Do everything other than work. Make sure that you blame the police when you are arrested and blame the teachers when your children flunk out. Be sure to blame the fire department when your house burns down after you caused a fire. Don't just not contribute, but be a drain on the system. Make sure that you blast everyone who sees this with loaded words and make sure that politicians fear you.
And why would I want to live in a city that fosters welfare, crime, and wants to tax me disproportionately?
Posted by: "Little Debbie" | January 20, 2010 10:49 AM
Does anyone want to start talking about pension reform yet?
Posted by: _kevin | January 20, 2010 11:42 AM
The City needs to consider a retention strategy to hang onto long time Baltimore residents who wish to move. Many would prefer to remain in the city but know they'll be clobbered with much higher property taxes once they are no longer protected by the Homestead Tax Credit. Why can't they assume the credit that was extended to the seller of their new home in the city?
Posted by: Think..about..it | January 20, 2010 12:11 PM
My property taxes have skyrocketed enough already. There isn't much more to take from people in terms of property taxes. Raising them will only flatline buying in the city and reduce available housing for the middle class and "those who need affordable housing the most"
Posted by: DMA | January 20, 2010 12:50 PM
Jamie, I think you can help the citizens of this city if you can point to a document where the budget appropriations are spelled out clearly. This is the age of internet and this document should be somewhere. I've looked and it's not easy to find. Does this document exist? Can we have a link on the Sun so every citizen can have a look at it?
Maybe this is too much to hope for in this age of accounting gimmicks.
Posted by: semiconscious | January 20, 2010 4:17 PM
Taxes are already high. Look at this list.
http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/taxesbycity2005/index.html
Baltimore has so many services that you would think the taxes are justified.
But most of these services and places are worthless, unless you want to get raped, mugged, or shot. So they sit idle, collect trash, blood stains, and drug needles...or your eye falls out of its socket after you get beat by 14 year olds on a bus.
But the City pretends that everything is fine, and all the bad things are "perception", hence the "BELIEVE" campaign.
And it goes on building and funding projects that would be last on the list of a dying City, and goes on funding swank town homes in Little Italy for Section 8. How about a greener Baltimore? Why? We already have the most park area in any City in the country and most of it unused due to crime. None of it warrants the expenditure or even makes sense.
Bottom line, City Hall is corrupt to the bone, inept, and racist. It should be investigated by the Feds. That should be Rawling-Blake's priority number one task. She can't get anything done otherwise (if she wanted to that is, which she does not).
I don't care if they find oil Baltimore and it rains diamonds from the sky, it'll remain a cesspool. For ever more. Alas.
Posted by: oz | January 20, 2010 4:19 PM
oz,
Why do you even care about this isssue? Given your description of the city as a "cesspool", I'm guessing that you don't live here. I'm also guessing that you haven't been to Patterson Park- otherwise, you would realize that it is not, to use your description, "unused".
While you lecture us from the outside looking in, we'll continue to work towards improving our city. We don't need your advice. Good day, sir.
Posted by: MCG | January 20, 2010 4:36 PM
DMA, try this doc for starters:
http://www.baltimorecity.gov/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Ae7sUlC6Yck%3d&tabid=215&mid=2002
and this page for more:
http://www.baltimorecity.gov/Government/AgenciesDepartments/Finance/DocumentsReports.aspx
MCG, well said.
Posted by: _kevin | January 20, 2010 5:13 PM
As I have said before, what is taking so long to get the slots in the City of Baltimore? This was approved over a year ago!!!!! There are other ways to increase revenue without raising taxes. They should be putting slots at Pimlico Race Course and in the Inner Harbor. Get it done already!!!!! Every day that this stalls will cost them MILLIONS!!!!!!!
Posted by: Frank Rizzo | January 20, 2010 6:48 PM