baltimoresun.com

« Wachovia/Wells Fargo borrowers: an event for you | Main | Stay tuned for December home sale numbers »

January 8, 2010

A Consuming Interests poll you'd be interested in

The Consuming Interests blog is asking a question that homeowners and economists alike are wrestling with: Is it ever the right decision to walk away from your home and your mortgage?

In a New York Times magazine piece, Roger Lowenstein argues that corporations default on loans for business reasons, so why not Joe Schmoe?

Mortgage holders do sign a promissory note, which is a promise to pay. But the contract explicitly details the penalty for nonpayment — surrender of the property. The borrower isn’t escaping the consequences; he is suffering them.

It's a hotly debated issue, as you can imagine. What do you think? You can take the Consuming Interests poll here.

Posted by Jamie Smith Hopkins at 10:10 AM | | Comments (1)
Categories: Mortgages, The foreclosure mess
        

Comments

Nothing personal, it's just business.

If I were significantly underwater, decided it was time to move on, and found a workable alternative then I would jump ship and default too. Everyone wants a piece of your money and sometimes you have to wrap your arms around it and hoard it for yourself to get through a tough time. I like where I live and don't want to do that. However, there may come a time where it becomes the path of least resistance to jump ship.

Real estate is an investment regardless of how many people say it's not. Businesses treat it as an investment. People put their money towards a mortgage hoping for free and clear ownership in the future or a significant bump in value just like a stock or some other investment. Real estate can be a way to move up in status just like stocks or other investments. I see no moral or ethical problem for people who default and turn over their real estate without trashing it. They are simply following the contract. It's not their fault the big banks didn't plan for the worst. Those who trash their real estate on the way out should face heavy consequences though.

Would I prefer people to honor their obligations despite the out clauses? Yes. That's just not the way things work these days. If you don't cover your own butt you risk getting taken advantage of.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Name-calling aimed at other commenters is not welcome here. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jamie Smith Hopkins
Jamie Smith Hopkins, a Baltimore Sun reporter since 1999, writes about the regional economy. Her reporting on the housing market has won national and local awards. Hopkins is a Columbia native and has lived in Maryland all her life, save for 10 months spent covering schools in Ames, Iowa.
She trained to become a wonk by spending large chunks of time as a geek and an insufferable know-it-all.
Baltimore Sun articles by Jamie
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Baltimore Sun Real Estate section
Archive: Dream Home
Dream Home takes readers into the houses of area residents who have found their ideal home.
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
  • Sign up for the At Home newsletter
The home and garden newsletter includes design tips and trends, gardening coverage, ideas for DIY projects and more.
See a sample | Sign up

Charm City Current
Categories
Stay connected