Bill aimed at renters fails to pass
The foreclosure bill that did pass was HB 640, which "allows local governments to pass ordinances requiring lenders to report foreclosure filings to local governments within five days of filing them, instead of two weeks before evicting tenants," the Daily Record says.
There's a delicate balance between protecting the rights of tenants in a foreclosure situation -- if they were paying their rent, they're innocent victims -- and the rights of lenders, who have repeatedly said they don't want to be landlords.
What do you think is the right balance?
Categories: Renting, The foreclosure mess



Comments
While it may not be fair to either the lender or the tenant when a bankruptcy occurs, the lender is certainly in a better position to bear the risk. The bill only required 3 months of extension, surely the lender can manage the property for 3 months and still make a sale happen.
Posted by: brian | April 14, 2009 11:36 AM
The miinimum amount of notice to renters would be that normally required by law which in many cases (I'm not sure about Baltimore) bars a new owner from eviting a tenant of the previous owner but requires the new owner to either keep the tenant or give them more than ample time to find new housing. Why should it be different because a bank takes ownership?
Posted by: Lisa | April 14, 2009 3:52 PM
We all know that Realtors' golden rule is "Now is a good time to buy."
Today, Long and Foster announced plans to pay mortgages for six months if the buyer becomes unemployed, and in doing so gave us this corollary to the golden rule as a souvenir of the times we're in:
"Although this is a great time to buy residential real estate for many, there's still a lot to consider," said Mary K. Weddle, executive vice president of The Long & Foster Cos
Posted by: Newspeak police | April 15, 2009 7:02 PM
What happens if a bank forecloses on a rental without a lead certificate? If we force banks to continue renting they are breaking the law and risk of lead lawsuits the day they take over the property.
Posted by: Ned Carey | April 15, 2009 7:31 PM