« To hope or not to hope | Main | Income: $14,000 a year ... or $50,000 a month? »

Step right up to play the blame game

Most people seem to agree that the housing downturn is not a blameless phenomenon. Whom to blame, though -- that's the question.

Homeowners for getting mortgages or lines of credit they couldn't afford? Lenders for making loans no sane professional would touch? Wall Street for happily distributing those loans throughout the financial stratosphere as mortgage-backed securities? The feds for keeping interest rates rock-bottom low and hyping homeownership? Real estate agents and others in the industry for assuring Americans that, no matter what, "now is a great time to buy"?

Everyone?

I pose this question because two journalists have weighed in with a book called Chain of Blame: How Wall Street Caused the Mortgage and Credit Crisis. So, without further ado, I'd like to hear which group you most blame. (Just to be absolutely clear: Choosing one group does not necessarily mean you're saying the rest were innocent.)

UPDATE at 5:15 p.m. on Sunday: Most of you think either homeowners or the mortgage industry is most to blame -- the two categories each have 31 percent of the vote at the moment. Next after that: the "Everyone's equally to blame" category, with 22 percent.

Comments

Jamie your poll is far too simplistic. It isn't an either/or, nor is everyone "equally" to blame. Certainly everyone involved *shares* in the blame.

Ah, but that's why I ask who's most to blame. Whenever economists bring up the subject, they'll name a number of groups but will usually pick one they think is more culpable than the rest.

Ahh, good question. Everyone is to blame.

But at the top are the homebuyers, the mortage bankers and the realtors. They started this chain reaction.

I voted for everyone equally because I think all the causes are linked in one way or another. The general problem I think is that some of the players involved are just collecting a fee while others have skin in the game. Those with skin in the game need to recognize that those who make a living by selling something (real estate agent, mortgage broker, mortgage back security broker, etc.) are going to tend to do what is best for them.

So, the borrowers should have been wary of a mortgage broker who can somehow find a way for them to purchase something that they couldn't before. The investor that purchased securities backed by mortgages should have been wary of who did the underwriting and what was truly backing their investment. Of course these service providers are supposed to look out for their clients best interests as well so they can be blamed too.

Freedom means freedom to succeed or fail. Easy lending isn't a bad thing, but greed, lying, cheating is.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the site owner before they will appear. Thanks for waiting.

Note: Arguments are welcome, but please -- no calling people mean names. Jamie can take it, but she doesn't want to see personal attacks between Wonk readers.

Please enter the letter "t" in the field below:
About the blogger
Jamie Smith Hopkins, a Baltimore Sun reporter since 1999, writes about the regional economy. Her reporting on the housing market has won national and local awards. Hopkins is a Columbia native and has lived in Maryland all her life, save for 10 months spent covering schools in Ames, Iowa.
She trained to become a wonk by spending large chunks of time as a geek and an insufferable know-it-all.
Baltimore Sun articles by Jamie
Most Recent Comments
-- ADVERTISEMENT --