June home sales: Price and sales down
The median price, for those who prefer that measurement, was down almost 7 percent.
Homeowners who sold in June got 92 percent of what they were asking for, or at least 92 percent of their most recent asking price. (It was 95 percent a year earlier.)
All the suburban counties in the metro area saw average prices drop, with the largest coming in Carroll and Howard counties. They were down almost 13 percent. Average prices rose about 5 percent in Baltimore City.
Sales, meanwhile, fell the most in the city -- almost 40 percent -- and the least in Howard (25 percent).
Now I'm off to do some number-crunching. Want more details in the meantime? See the MRIS statistics HERE.







Comments
Supply vs demand. I only took 1 economics course in college, but that I remember.
Sales will not pick up until sellers price their houses accordingly. It seems to me that, from a realtors' point of view, they should be "counseling" their sellers about what price their house is actually worth. After all, 6% of x is better than 0% of x + over-pricing.
I put counseling in quotes, because I am not so sure that realtors actually do anything but pull a number from a sale from 2005 and go with it.
Posted by: anon | July 10, 2008 10:41 AM
The last time I checked, the U.S. population continues to rise as people are living longer, coupled with immigration (legal and illegal). Therefore, the demand for housing will increase. Think long term.
Posted by: Ed | July 10, 2008 11:21 AM
Jamie:
The "percent of what sellers are asking for" metric is meaningless and subject to rampant fraud.
"Months of inventory" is the most important measure of this market.
Houses are coming onto the market at a rate two times as fast as they are being sold (use the MRIS statistics to compare the "new listings" number to the "marked contract or contingent number").
Posted by: John | July 10, 2008 11:27 AM
Oh, I look at months of inventory all the time, John. That's one of the first numbers I calculate when I write the monthly sales story (as opposed to the quick-hit blog post).
But I figured that, with all the debate here about asking prices, people might be interested in that stat, flawed though it may be.
Posted by: Jamie Smith Hopkins | July 10, 2008 11:36 AM
Baltimore County prices have fallen below June 2005 figures:
AVG MEDIAN
June 2008 296K 245K
June 2005 301K 249K
Posted by: John | July 10, 2008 11:46 AM
I took a look at the MRIS statistics, and the most dramatic shift is to government insured financing (FHA/VA), a roughly 330% increase year over year. The reasons for such a dramatic shift is because private mortgage insurers have dropped out of the home financing market place and many are near bankruptcy. This means high closing cost to both buyer and sellers. It also means there is huge downward pricing pressure on properties selling for over the $560K FHA/VA lending, and the $417K Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac conforming mortgage caps.
The other dramatic shift I noticed is in million properties sales volume dropped 58% year over year. I have no idea how people will get financing without huge down payments, so the sales volume drop is not a surprise. Given the market factors it's holding well.
Posted by: H | July 10, 2008 11:48 AM
Supply & demand is economics 101 but buyers set the price for commodities and almost 50% of the homes sold in the Metropolitan area in June were on the market for less than 60 days.
John: 2717 listings expired or were withdrawn from the market in the Baltimore Metro in June. These properties plus the 2349 contracts equal more than the new listings. Some of the withdrawn properties were listed for sale and for rent and the for sale listing is withdrawn if the property rents.
Yes the number of homes sold in June in the Metro area was 31% less than those sold in June '07, however, last month saw the highest number of monthly sales since August '07. You will see this percent drop in the next two months since we have now past the anniversary of the mortgage meltdown. The numbers you are looking at are closings and they lag contracts by 30-60 days typically. Therefore, the meltdown which began in April '07 only started to show up in June '07 numbers and the negative influence on the market grew throughout last summer.
Posted by: Ross | July 10, 2008 12:24 PM
A good statistic for predicting real estate pricing equilibrium is rental cost verse ownership cost.
At the peak of the real estate boom in Naples it cost 40 cents on the dollar to rent verse owning. I know that a large part of the listing expirations are discourage sellers, but does any one know how rental pricing is holding up verses ownership cost?
Posted by: H | July 10, 2008 12:57 PM
I just think there is a lack of measurement accuracy, and a fair bit of intentional deception, in these statistics. Nobody is measuring sale price vs initial asking price, and initial asking price is really arbitrary (more a measure of seller sentiment than anything else). Lots of homes come off the market and then go back, not having been sold in between, so the # days on the market is misleading. Actual sale prices don't represent other parts of the deal, like points, closing costs, various taxes the seller may pay to the buyer, repairs made, time concessions, etc.
Realtors seems to be using everything in their bag of tricks to prevent the slide in prices, but it seems counterintuitive to me. Sales might actually accelerate if realtors encouraged sellers to reprice their homes downwards, and to maintain some paper trail to the initial asking prices (rather than obscuring what those initial prices were.)
Posted by: Bob | July 10, 2008 1:15 PM
Most real estate agents in MD have not clue on prices. They would not advise their clients on bid/ask prices.
In my Howard County subdivision (> 1,000 mix housing), prices have been flat for the past two years and houses have been selling even in winter. While the houses are selling for similar proices in the past couple of years, the current loss is unrealized gain. The housing prices have stayed the same probably because no one wants to sell unless they have to.
It is OK to compare regional median prices but even in a region housing prices may tell a different story altogether.
Posted by: anony | July 10, 2008 2:31 PM
Ross:
You suggest that a withdrawn listing is as good as a sale. This is not the case.
A withdrawn listing is more likely a seller who cannot get the price he wants. Its really a "latent" listing that will reappear on the market. In most cases, the seller's desire to sell has not gone away, it's just that the sales environment is inauspicious and the seller realizes that a decent offer won't be forthcoming.
Withdrawn listing can also be due to foreclosures, which are still rising dramatically.
Posted by: John | July 10, 2008 3:50 PM
Ed,
According to the census bureau as reported by Market Watch (http://www.marketwatch.com/news/story/us-census-bureau-new-orleans/story.aspx?guid=%7BFA1A03A2-4051-45F2-807B-ED22F5FBBCB1%7D&dist=hppr) the population in Baltimore is decreasing. There goes your argument.
To Bob: Amen, I couldn't agree more.
Posted by: anon | July 10, 2008 5:56 PM
John: A listing that is withdrawn from the for sale inventory because it has been rented maybe a latent listing, latent being hidden, but if it does not reappear for one year, it is not part of the dynamics of the present supply and demand. All houses ae latent listings under this concept. Homes in Baltimore City rented through the multiple listing service were up 66% in June '08 over June '07.
Posted by: Ross | July 10, 2008 6:01 PM
As I read through these, I was struck by the comment about listing a house for sale and then renting it out instead. Do these sellers/landlords then dutifully report to the State of Maryland that they are no longer residing there? Obviously, with the budget crisis the State has, that extra revenue would probably come in handy? What about it?
I have looked at houses for sale that are also for rent and I have looked at houses for sale that are completely vacant (I mean not even toilet tissue). Yet, when I look up the address in the State's property division, it is listed as being the residence of the owner. This is called fraud, as far as I know.
To Jamie Hopkins, perhaps this is worth a story? After all, when these investors cheat the government, the rest of us have to pay.
Posted by: anon | July 10, 2008 6:06 PM
Ross said: Homes in Baltimore City rented through the multiple listing service were up 66% in June '08 over June '07.
Ross:
That's an interesting statistic. Where did you get it? Thanks.
Posted by: John | July 11, 2008 7:47 AM
Anon - Are you really going to argue that the U.S. population is decreasing? I did not mention Baltimore City.
Posted by: Ed | July 11, 2008 11:05 AM
Duh, we are talking about the local market, where the population is decreasing. What state's housing values are you discussing?
Posted by: anon | July 11, 2008 1:35 PM
@ anon. Check out a bill passed last year (http://mlis.state.md.us/2007RS/chapters_noln/Ch_565_hb0436E.pdf) in the General; Assembly aimed at making sure homestead tax credit only go to residential owners. See SDAT's site on the issue here: http://www.dat.state.md.us/sdatweb/Homestead_app.htm
Posted by: sherry | July 11, 2008 2:34 PM
John: I am a MRIS member with access to all the data, not just the compiled market statistics.
Posted by: Ross | July 11, 2008 3:13 PM
Hi Sherry,
Thanks for the tip. But didn't I read that so many people were complaining that they were rescinding it? I hope not.
Jamie the Wonk, do you know if this law is still in force?
Posted by: anon | July 11, 2008 4:41 PM
Anon, the repeal effort failed, so the law is still in effect. Here's a link to the state Department of Assessments and Taxation's web page about the application process: https://sdathtc.resiusa.org/homestead
Posted by: Jamie Smith Hopkins | July 11, 2008 6:34 PM
Thanks Jamie!
Posted by: anon | July 12, 2008 10:07 AM