baltimoresun.com

« Counting to a trillion: Think eons, ages, epochs | Main | Goodnight Moon »

May 4, 2011

Ex-Mexican president: U.S. must legalize drugs

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox is correctly calling for the U.S. to end the war on drugs, which is killing his country, by legalizing them. Here he is in San Antonio:

"As a country, we are going through problems due to the fact that the United States consumes too many drugs," Fox, who served as Mexico's president from 2000-2006, told reporters Monday night before a speech at the Turkish-American Chamber of Commerce in San Antonio.

"I would recommend to legalize, de-penalize all drugs," Fox added.

Here he is in Houston:

Former Mexican President Vicente Fox said in Houston on Tuesday that the United States should legalize drugs to end the violence in Mexico.

During a speech at the University of Houston, Fox noted that Mexico is located between drug-producing nations in South America and the world's largest drug-consuming nation, the United States.

"We just happen to be in between," Fox said.

In the last few years, drug cartel violence has tarnished Mexico's image — hurting tourism and foreign direct investment, he said.

"We're paying a huge price," Fox told the audience of mostly students, who applauded his suggestion that the United States decriminalize drug consumption to reduce violence — as occurred when the U.S. repealed alcohol Prohibition in the 1930s.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:47 PM | | Comments (7)
Categories: War on Drugs
        

Comments

What a great idea. Let's implement ideas from a failed president of a country that is failing their own citizens. I have an idea, Mr. Fox, go back to Mexico and shut down the drug cartels.

Phillip, it's a business which like all others is based on supply and demand. Although in this one it is a twisted wreck because of spotty and corrupt and far too often outright corruption at every level including the Banks and Governments themselves.

Prohibition does NOT work. This simple truth has been proven true in every arena of human activity that others would try to align with their own more narrow life views.
---

Legalize the natural state agricultural products even if DuPont and Hearst would prefer to not have to compete with their industrial and commercial uses (among other spurious reasons they were made illegal to begin with).

Re-medicalize the pharmaceutical products and by that simple measure return their distribution and control to Physicians and Pharmacists. Treat the worst cases as the social welfare problems they actually are rather than through the simplistic, costly and wasteful criminal process.

it's time for society to grow up.

Let me see if I got this right? The current President of Mexico wants the US to ban the private ownership of firearms and the past President wants the US to legalize drugs. No wonder they are all heading north. How messed up can a country get?

Great idea Phil. While he's at it, perhaps he can shut down the cartels north of the border as well. Can't believe the stupidity I'm reading.

With Prohibition, once the ban on alcohol was repealed, the criminal and violent individuals and organizations that built up around it also disappeared. We have to look at cost and benefit with banning drugs too. MrRational says it well. With legalization, yes, you are still going to have problems but not anything like the horrific state of affairs in Mexico.

While I agree with Fox, I definitely don't see it happening to that extent, and definitely not anytime soon.

If we aren't even willing to stop this useless, expensive war on drugs due to the problems it creates in our own country, why would we be willing to do it for someone else's?

John asks: why would we be willing to do it for someone else's?

Because John, everything is inter-connected. Everything.

In this specific example the connection includes a common border with a daily transfer of capital and arms and contraband and people and all doe with compounding economic factors like employment and regular economic opportunities which get thwarted or worse by the distorting effect of the corruption.

How does that answer suit you?

But in other examples (like oh, lets say Afghanistan?) the connection ties in with influences on our foreign policy choices and options and the actual full on military interventions we are suffering through.

I could go on.

But let me leave this small lesson with a more pop cultural reference that may illustrate the simple truths involved. As you'll hear voiced by the under appreciated good guy in every crime movie or novel:

Follow the money!

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected