baltimoresun.com

« The guy who predicted the iPhone 100 years ago | Main | Ralph Lauren takes crass commercialism to new low »

August 19, 2010

Fear, loathing and smart meters

Our Monday coverage of the decision to go forward with "smart," computerized electricity meters for BGE customers got a lot of reaction, much of it negative toward smart meters. This is not necessarily representative. People with complaints are usually the ones who pipe up; those who are glad or don't care don't take the trouble to respond.

Still, there seems to be a significant amount of skepticism out there as to whether BGE's new meters will be a good thing. There was a lot of "big brother is getting even more intrusive" reaction, although one could argue that smart meters will eventually give you more, not less, personal control over your energy. Many of you have also asked: Please tell us again, how exactly will smart meters work? I promise I'll get to that once I get a free moment or two.

Meanwhile, here's a sampling of reactions from my email and from blog comments:

So let me get this straight. BGE customers will pay for the installation of meters that will allow BGE to charge us more for electricity at times when we need it most, so that we can save money on our electricity by turning off our air conditioners during this time. Sorry, but that doesn't sound like a good deal to me. I don't need a "smart" meter to know how much electricity I'm using - I can hear my air conditioner running. "Smart" meters are a great deal for BGE and a lousy deal for BGE customers.

And:

I object to the mandatory installation and subsequent charge of these units, because I resent the implication that I'm too stupid to control my own decision about when to use electricity in my home. But even more important is the very real possibility, that at some point in the future BGE would decide for me, by way of the "Smart Meter" when and how much electricity I am entitled to receive at any given moment. When this issue first surfaced, I notified BGE that I did not wish to participate in their program, and was assured that there would be no installation at my home. I presently receive my "juice" from WGE. Competition MUST be a primary consideration with this utility.

And:

I can't believe that BGE has suddenly morphed into a benefactor of the energy consumming public with this shiny new Smart Meter experiment. They must figure on making a ton of money eventually. Why do I feel that "Big Brother" will soon be watching over our electrical useage.

And:

BGE (Constellation) customers who are interested in conserving energy (money) must resort to a proactive alternative life style rather than reacting to a meter reading. A customer's monthly bill's KWH usage comparison for 2 consecutive years is a true "free" result of effective conservation. (It is also an unavoidable indication of a trend) Very few people will run to a meter every time they light a light, plug in an appliance or change the thermostat to determine the energy increase or decrease.Instead of advocting energy conservation, the Constellation executives are proposing an unnecessary expense to consumers and a very poor use of stimulus money.

And:

People know the plan is to cut their power at peak times, and they know power to wealthy people will never be cut, and they know that cuts will fall heaviest on the most vulnerable, yet they know everyone's job is dependent on that power which will put them at greater disadvantage to the wealthy. People do not want wealthy-people, utility company investors, or foreign owners in charge of their power switch. Smart meter brings all three.

And:

Anybody that swallows the bunk that BGE is installing "smart meters" for the consumer's benefit aren't paying attention. This is about control. They will decide when you can use lights, heat and air. Just more "Big Brother".
Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:00 AM | | Comments (9)
Categories: BGE/electricity
        

Comments

Jay:

Here's a tip: find someone with an hourly meter purchasing directly off the marketplace and ask what their rates are. Then read the RSA agreements on scheduling capacity and then figure out how much more a standard load profile for residences costs than unscheduled hourly service and do the math.

You really are barking up the wrong tree on this discussion and I can't even figure out how these comments are relevant.

These comments show a basic misunderstanding of the role of BGE and smart grid. BGE is not proposing to use smart grids to “ration” electricity or cut anyone’s electricity at peak times. In fact, they are not allowed to. The PSC requires that utilities provide enough electricity to cover their customer’s demand at any time. They cannot choose to turn people’s power off on a whim just because it is hot out. The current PeakRewards program allows them to remotely shut off air conditioners on certain days, but that is a completely voluntary program, and participants are compensated even if their A/C is not turned off.

Under the smart grid proposal, BGE will pay customers if they reduce their demand during “critical hours”, those hot afternoons when the overall system is close to its capacity. However, they don’t require customers to do anything, nor can they compel them to. If you want to run your A/C full blast during these times, BGE can’t do anything about it. Period.

Aside from the direct payments for cutting one’s energy use, we consumers also benefit from reducing the peak demand on the system. The main reason that we should want to cut our use during these critical periods is because the electric generation system has to be able to produce enough power to meet the highest electric load of the year, even if that load only lasts for a few hours. In 2009, the peak demand in the PJM (the marketplace where Maryland utilities buy power) was 126,805 mW. There were only 5 hours in the entire year when the PJM was within 3% of that figure. That means that the last 3,500 mW of power plant capacity in the system (more than double Calvert Cliff’s size) was only needed 0.06% of the time!

The existing electric grid can handle some increase in the total amount of power used – the average PJM load in 2009 was only 61% of the maximum. If the total power used went up by 10%, existing plants could run more often to meet the demand. But if peak demand went up 10%, then either new power plants have to be built just to run for those few hours a year, or we would have rolling blackouts. Neither is a good option.

The best way to keep costs out of the system is to shave the power needed during those few critical hours each year. Smart grid is only the first step to help curtail the growth in peak demand. Consumer education, enabling technology, and eventual replacement of inefficient appliances are all needed to keep peak demand from growing. It is a lot cheaper for us consumers to cut our energy use for a few hours a year than face rolling blackouts or pay for multi-billion power plants that are only on a few hours a year.

TM - you are right in pointing out electricity supply and regulation is one big mess. So slapping Smart Meters on houses is just stupid. There will be so many limitations put on their use now that it's just not worth now. A lack of planning and selling the electricity user base has backfired and now there will be many many people against Smart Metering and any attempt to close the loop between generation and consumption.

BGE/Constellation (for all intents and purposes other than taxes, they are one and the same) has PROVEN time and time again that they value their profits over any benefit to the people they are allegedly in existence to serve (remember what the term "public utitlity" USED to mean). ANYTHING they propose is merely to increase their profits - NOT to benefit the public! There was a time that the PSC used its proper authority to make sure that utilities existed to serve the interests of the public! No one asked BGE to provide gas and electric to the citizens of Maryland - if they don't like it, too bad! We've all paid many times over for Mayo Shattucks tens of millions in bonuses!

What benefit will this be to those of us who for YEARS have done EVERYTHING in our power to minimize our electric use to the point where there is NO WAY to get it lower other than just plain not using it at all?

Even if I tried I could not lower my electric by 2% to 5%. Its not possible other than to install very expensive PV or solar water heat.

What savings then will my family see?

Much of the proposed savings that will be enabled by Smart Meters will be a change in the pricing during peak periods. In this case, a consumer would not be charged more during peak times (hot summer days) if they did not reduce their consumption, but they would receive credits if they did. In my opinion, that is a win-win. If you do nothing, you will not be penalized, but if you reduce your consumption, you save money.

A consumer who changes nothing but currently uses power during peak periods will benefit as long as some fraction of people do cut their use at that time. If I do nothing, but 1% is cut off of peak demand, that's another generation unit that doesn't have to be built as demand expands. Building new capacity is passed along to all consumers to some extent.

Flattening the daily cycle of electricity use in the region (reducing the gap between the minimum in the wee hours of the morning and the afternoon or so maximum) means more of 'total' power is coming from cheaper base load generators, so everyone pays less - even those who don't reduce their peak demand.

I hate to sound so skeptical but I'm doing all I can to save money and I never see a difference in my BGE bill and think this smart meter thing is just another empty promise.

I already signed up for all there current energy savings programs BUT my bill keeps going up. I've heard over and over that BGE is finding ways to cut my bill but it never actually happens.

I saw in my BGE bill they were promoting the Ravens, may be that's why my bill is going up to pay for Ray Lewis salary! I guyess my BGE bill is paying for their skybox too?

Good lord, is the Tea Party getting into utility regulation now? This knee-jerk "big brother" thing is really getting out of hand. And all these claims the BGE is now going to start telling us when we can use electricity seem to be cut from the same mold as the (false) claims that health care regulation leads to death panels.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected