baltimoresun.com

« Evidence-free slots litigation | Main | St. Joe probe into Midei prompted by employee »

May 27, 2010

The smug, clueless, arrogant BP chairman Svanberg

Insufferable smugness from BP Chairman Carl-Henric Svanberg in an interview with the Financial Times.

The US is a big and important market for BP, and BP is also a big and important company for the US, with its contribution to drilling and oil and gas production. So the position goes both ways.

This is not the first time something has gone wrong in this industry, but the industry has moved on.

Dude, they read the FT in the United States. And there is such a thing as "the Internet." Nice analysis of BP's PR and policy botches by Yves Smith, who states, in part:

This is simply stunning. First, the BP chairman essentially puts his company on an equal footing as the United States, implying their relation is not merely reciprocal, but equal. BP doesn’t even approach the importance of Microsoft in its heyday, a-not-very-tamed provider of a near monopoly service. And his posture “this is just one problem like others, no biggie” is an offense to common sense and decency.

Many readers have pointed to signs that BP’s order of battle in combatting the leak is seeking to maximize recovery rather than minimize damage, again a sign of backwards priorities. The widely cited gold standard for crisis management, Johnson & Johnson’s 1982 Tylenol tamperings, had the company immediately doing whatever it took, no matter how uneconomical it seemed, to protect the public. BP instead has been engaging in old school conduct: keep a wrap on information as long as possible, minimize outside input, and (presumably) contain costs.

What is worse is the complete lack of any apology or sign of remorse. Even if BP engaged in more or less the same conduct, it would be far more canny for its top officials to make great shows of empathy for all the people who are suffering as a result of the disaster, remind the public that they lost their own men too, and make great speeches about not resting until the leak is plugged, and then add the caveat” “but we have to proceed in a deliberate manner, rushing could make matters worse. We know this is frustrating, and we wish we could hurry the pace.”


Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:54 AM | | Comments (5)
Categories: Environment
        

Comments

Well said. I'm reading the memoir by the late British journalist Alistair Cooke of his motor trip (in a Lincoln Zephyr) across the US in 1941-1942. That long ago America was a beehive of manufacturing, and its business leaders and engineers performed miracles in converting their factories to war production and in inventing new ways of prosecuting the war. Today, it seems that we mainly manufacture software, and Wall Street makes money from money and from short-term corporate manipulations. BP, for all its billions in earnings, apparently has put little or no money into disaster engineering, and it apparently cares little for the safety of its workers. Would it ever, ever be possible for the "bigs"--big banks, big oil, big insurance, big pharma, etc. to develop a public conscience? Nothing but money gets through to them, but in an ideal world I should think that concern for customers and what's important to them, such as the environment, would be good for business. I probably don't understand the addictive power of money.

One thing I am missing here and have not seen discussed much is that there is considerable deep water drilling in the North Sea and I do not recall any major events there which is surely one of the most challenging places to drill. The depths may be different but I bet the enivronmental protocols differ from those employed in the G.O.M. It is likely that BP did not follow their own guidelines.

The end result here will be more regulation despite the failure of the regulator in this instance. Additionally this will become unduly politicized with further unintended consequences.

BP needs to step forward, accept responsibility and start writing checks. The damages will be well beyond any other entity's ability to pay, even considering insurance carrier participation. That aspect will be the subject of endless litigation. In the interim those people down there have to survive.

What a MESS!

I believe the smug attitude would be instantly corrected if we could find the Bernie Madoff like figures in this scandal, the corporate type who overruled the engineers in this case and probably caused the explosion. The government regulator who instead of requiring proper safeguards, accepted BP graft. Once they are identified by corporate informants who don't want to go to jail, the corporate types should recieve sentences enhanced by the fact their actions caused death, and probably hundreds of billions of losses and they have shown zero remorse to date. If they really hate America that much, lets show them the part of America worth hating, maximum security prison in general population.

Jay: thank you for being one of the few journalist on the 'Net who is posting something --anything!-- about Carl-Henric Svanberg! Why is it so hard to get any real data on this guy on the web? His wikipedia page is vague. Can you dig and tell us who really got this guy hired at BP. Was he setup for a fall? Geez, the guy was a Telcom Electronics guy for Ericsson--how did he bust into the good ole boy oil biz? Sidepoint: he and his wife filed for divorce the minute he got hired by BP last summer -- what's the deal with that?

I feel sorry saying this, but Swedish bosses are very arrogant and silly in general, and Mr. Svanberg is no exception from this undesirable behavior.

You have to remember that Sweden is a Socialist state, where people with a strong or different opinion than the majority, are most often ended up being banished.

If you get too serious at work, o boy, you are in trouble, people will remember it for years.

I guess this may explain why Mr. Svanberg is acting like an arrogant Clown.

What you are witnessing is just normal Swedish Management behavior,nothing else.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Verification (needed to reduce spam):

About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected