baltimoresun.com

« Iceland's crisis costs it McDonald's, Big Macs | Main | Will the PSC slow down BGE's smart meters? »

October 28, 2009

Will Legg Mason be independent in two years?

Legg Mason, the money-running firm whose assets under management have fallen from $1 trillion to less than $700 million, billion, thanks to falling stock values and withdrawals from its funds, has entered a new phase. Underperforming public firms such as this are always under risk that an outside investor will decide he has better ideas about how to build shareholder value than the guys in charge.

Nelson Peltz, who has a long record of such agitation, has taken on that role at Legg. He has 4 percent of its stock now. Expect him to accumulate more. Financial types I talk to around town believe there is a decent chance that the firm Chip Mason built will not be independent in a couple years. If this turns out to be the case, Peltz's arrival will be the first step in this process.

But the sale of Legg is far from guaranteed. Legg is recovering on its own -- faster than the economy. Peltz may be satisfied with less-drastic outcomes. Here is part of today's column. Read the whole thing here.

The arrival of Peltz and his 4.3 percent ownership stake increases the uncertainty. Given what Legg has been through, it was hard to imagine that the pressure on Bill Miller and the firm's other money managers to perform could have been any greater. But it just intensified. "His appearance is not good news for management," says Charles M. Elson, a business professor and corporate governance expert at the University of Delaware. "But it may be good news for the shareholders."
Posted by Jay Hancock at 8:21 AM | | Comments (4)
Categories: Finance
        

Comments

The arrival of Mr. Peltz surely means big change for Legg Mason. The institutional money managment business(es), and probably the mutual fund business survive. All the other pieces that have been acquired and rolled-up into this company over the years are no longer pertinent to any strategy and many are not even profitable. If Peltz has his way, I would imagine a first cleansing of the org chart would involve these "hangers-on" that don't move the earnings needle being shut down or sold to the highest bidder(s).

I believe they have $700 billion not million in AUMs. Not that drastic in this economy.

Thanks anonymous. $700 million and we'd all be in trouble.

Legg's, and to a greater extent Western Asset's, management is dubious at best. Not one of the Legg and/or Western senior management was removed after their SIV, structured credit and equity debacles almost tanked the firm. Mr. Peltz needs to remove Western's senior management as they are a laughing stock in fixed income circles and their continued presence contributes greatly to the onging shrinkage of their business. I also can't for the life of me understand why the Legg 'holding company' spends millions on 'corporate' managers who do nothing to add value. It's time to split up this entity and get value back to the shareholders.

JR

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "i" in the field below:
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Wednesdays and Fridays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Resources and Sun coverage
Stay connected