Will Tribune sell off The Sun, other papers?
Chicago papers keep reporting that Sam Zell will soon no longer be running Tribune Co. and the papers and TV stations it owns, including The Sun. That was always a given once Tribune sought protection from creditors in bankruptcy court last year. Zell put up hardly any money in the deal to start with; he's certainly not going to be calling the shots once creditors take over the ownership. The only question is: What will the creditors do with the company? Will they try to keep it together, preserving present management's vision of a national chain in several major markets? Or will they sell it off in pieces?
Today's report in the Chicago Sun-Times contains this line suggesting the option "B" is preferred:
The creditors, including investment banks owed $8.6 billion from Zell's Tribune takeover, would stage a takeover of their own and sell off the company's newspapers and broadcast stations as they see fit.
There is no further reference to breaking up the company.







Comments
That cant happen.
The historic synergy of the Baltimore Sun and the Tribune goes back over 9 years. How can you break up a tradition richly steeped in leverage buyouts?
Besides, as every journalist knows, today's modern journalism needs a Ministry of Mirth. There are only so many Lee Abrams and Randy Michaels to go around.
Do you think radio executives who know how to run a newspaper grow on trees?
I certainly don't.
Posted by: Bring back the WWWF | August 15, 2009 10:24 AM