Ross Douthat gets health care right
Ross Douthat, the New York Times' new conservative columnist, says:
In this future, somebody will need to stand for the principle that Medicare can’t pay every bill and bless every procedure. Somebody will need to defend the younger generation’s promise (and its pocketbooks). Somebody will need to say “no” to retirees.That’s supposed to be the Republicans’ job. They should stick to doing it.
From the Friday Hancock column:
"We don't have unlimited resources to spend on health care," says Dr. Sean Tunis, head of the Center for Medical Technology Policy in Baltimore. "And we're already neglecting other important social needs because there's simply not enough money."Republicans are supposed to get this. They're supposed to be the party that understands waste, limits, cost/benefit trade-offs and what happens when you let people (patients and doctors) spend somebody else's money (insurance companies' and taxpayers').
These days they sound like their own caricature of a Democrat, pretending that resources are endless, that everybody gets what they want and that measuring efficiency is the same as euthanasia.
Modern health care needs administration, priorities, choices and direction. It needs the best information on what works and what doesn't. Hysteria that blocks such information hurts patients, taxpayers and especially future taxpayers - our poor grandchildren who will get stuck with most of the bill.







Comments
We need to eliminate the fee-for-service payments to physicians and replace that with a salary and effective outcome evaluation of treatment. All healthcare services should also be required to be non-profit.
Posted by: NotableM | August 17, 2009 1:18 PM
Jay, your column is nonsensical. You setup the strawman of the Insurance Companies as being just as bad as the government in provisioning health care. Yet how free are the insurance companies to provide the types of products the marketplace wants? Not free at all and precisely because government regulators require insurance companies to treat conditions and diseases that many consumers would rather not pay for.
Rationing by price is the most fair of all possible systems. Any other system requires one to sacrifice liberty in return for a promise that can not always be fulfilled. The US health care system is disfunctional because of government interference and adding more government regulation will only make health care more unaffordable and inaccessible.
Posted by: Dan | August 17, 2009 2:08 PM
Theme song of Medicine in the future regardless of mode of delivery:
You can't always get what you want
But if you try sometime... you might find
You get what you need.
So... once we accept that NO you can't expect to get what you "want" when others are involved in paying for it... the rest becomes about the details.
Lets get on to the details and maybe even save some money too.
Posted by: MrRational | August 18, 2009 11:41 AM