Collender: F-22 fight ain't over
Says Stan Collender:
Yesterday's 58-40 vote in the Senate to cut funds for the F-22 is a big deal.But this was a vote on an authorization bill and the funds can still be provided in the DOD appropriation that will be considered later in the year.
An appropriation enacted after an authorization is the most recent indication of congressional intent and, therefore, legally may provide funds for programs that have not been authorized. That makes this vote important (especially because it shows what the White House can do on Capital Hill), but not the end of the story
It is not inconceivable that someone who voted against F-22 in the authorization eventually will vote for it in the appropriation.
So those who think it's time to celebrate should hold the champagne.
Comments
Yes, the fight is still on and on. But think about this. At least the government starts to save money for the sake of the country. And, this F-22 overspending is very obvious. They should know what they will have to go through to make the cut happens anyway. I believe they should be well prepared.
http://www.newsy.com/videos/f_22_funding_shot_down
Think about the "30 hours" maintenance and about $40,000 spending every hour this jet is on the air! That's a whole lot!!!!
Posted by: Ysth | July 23, 2009 12:40 PM
Talk about spending! What about 50 billion more going to a failure like GM. Or the 700 billion in stimulus wasted.
Air dominance as always been key factor in all U.S. military roles. Whens the last time a solidier as been killed by a foriegn fighter. Second the f-22 creates jobs for 44 states.
Third the F-22 as air to air and air to ground capabilities
Posted by: Philip Kingston | July 24, 2009 2:37 PM