baltimoresun.com

« Blue Dogs: Fiscally responsible or corporate tools? | Main | Massachusetts health plan wrecking state budget »

July 28, 2009

AARP questions BGE's 'smart meter' plan

The Maryland AARP questions BGE's plan to install smart, computerized meters and increase June-September peak-time electricity rates by about a fourth to 16 cents per kilowatt-hour. Sez the AARP:

BGE recommends a pricing structure for all residential customers that would raise rates in the summer by to 16 cents per kWh for usage between 2 and 7pm every summer day. While BGE’s press releases have noted the potential for customers to earn a peak reward credit in the amount of $1.75 per kWh, that option would only exist for the estimated 12 critical peak day events that BGE projects will occur. As a result, residential customers will pay a higher price for essential electricity service for every summer day and only obtain any rewards or benefits if there is a critical peak event called by PJM and only for those few days in which such critical peak events are likely to occur.

BGE has said changing the summertime rates will be "revenue neutral." To me that means revenue neutral NOT COUNTING the $1.75 rebates for lowering your consumption on critical days. Under a real revenue-neutral program, the increase in summertime 2pm - 7pm rates would be 100% offset by a decrease in non-peak rates for everybody. Mrs. Jones in Hampden would see her everyday daytime kw expense go up, but her everyday non-peak kw expense would go down by a like amount -- even if she doesn't change her use pattern.

The rebates for consumption cutters should be financed externally -- through savings gained from not burning expensive peak kilowatts, capacity payments etc. They shouldn't be financed by taking money from Mrs. Jones and others who who don't cut consumption. As BGE's Mark Case explained it when I asked him about this last week, BGE's plan won't penalize Mrs. Jones. Case:

The worst a customer can do is to forfeit the opportunity to save money via the rebates. Our rebate level is not funded through base rates or any customer subsidy – rather it is funded by the PJM capacity and energy revenues which result from the load reductions.

The PSC needs to make sure this plays out the way he describes it. The full text of AARP's letter to the PSC is below the fold.

AARP's letter to the PSC:

AARP opposes the request made by Baltimore Gas & Electric (BGE) to expedite consideration and approval of its proposed ‘Smart Grid Initiative’ which is estimated to cost more than $800 million over 15 years and would impose mandatory time of use rates. Expedited approval of a significant investment and fundamental change in pricing is contrary to the public interest. Nor is it necessary, as BGE implies, to secure federal stimulus funding. This request, combined with a similar request from PHI for its service territory, would add more than $1 billion in costs to customer bills. AARP urges the Commission to give these cases the careful scrutiny the consumers of Maryland deserve and expect.

It is unfair to parties, and the public, to fast track such a significant filing which would immediately approve a cost recovery tracker. BGE’s filing is more than 400 pages long and includes the testimony of five witnesses and extensive attachments and exhibits. AARP urges this Commission to establish a procedural schedule that will allow the full and fair opportunity for the parties to explore the evidentiary basis for BGE’s assertions about costs and benefits and provide testimony from parties other than BGE prior to any action by this Commission. To date there has not been any formal schedule or opportunity for an adjudicatory decision-making process on a proposal that is likely to have significant impacts on customer rates, terms and conditions of service. BGE’s proposed ‘legislative-style’ hearings are not adequate to fully investigate this level of investment.

As BGE notes in its July 22 letter, the Department of Energy requires utilities seeking federal funding under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) must include in its application ‘correspondence from their local regulatory agency indicating when the approval process will begin and outlining the likely timeline.’ However, BGE does not need to have the cost tracker approved prior to applying for these federal funds. An expedited approval is not a requirement of the DOE guidance.

Of particular concern to AARP is fast-tracking BGE’s proposal to radically change the pricing structure in Maryland by instituting a mandatory time-based rate structure for all residential customers. BGE recommends a pricing structure for all residential customers that would raise rates in the summer to 16 cents per kWh for usage between 2 and 7pm every summer day. While BGE’s press releases have noted the potential for customers to earn a peak reward credit in the amount of $1.75 per kWh, that option would only exist for the estimated 12 critical peak day events that BGE projects will occur. As a result, residential customers will pay a higher price for essential electricity service for every summer day and only obtain any rewards or benefits if there is a critical peak event called by PJM and only for those few days in which such critical peak events are likely to occur. BGE’s proposal does not provide any bill impact analysis of this dramatic change in residential rate structure. Nor should such a dramatic change be rushed through the normal regulatory process.

Other concerns should also be explored in further detail and with an opportunity for formal discovery and opportunity to submit testimony on the record, such as the basis for BGE’s estimates of costs and benefits. AARP notes that BGE intends to implement remote disconnection of service as part of its metering proposal and this policy change also deserves careful review and consideration.

AARP supports grid modernization, efforts to improve efficiencies in the transmission and distribution systems, and demand response programs that are cost effective for ratepayers. However, the cost and magnitude of the proposed investment, coupled with BGE’s intention to establish mandatory time based rates, are compelling reasons to reject the proposed expedited schedule. A more reasonable schedule that allows for full and fair review of this proposal should be established and would be available for BGE to include in an application to DOE for federal stimulus funding.

AARP requests an opportunity to appear and speak at the Administrative meeting on July 29, 2009.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:00 AM | | Comments (3)
Categories: BGE/electricity
        

Comments

So overall the prices are going up, with 12 days to be able to regain costs? But not full costs only partial costs. I thought 2 weeks ago the people from BG&E, the CEO actually with a constellation email, stated on one of his comments that the price would be going down. Not going up. Im sure if these articles are archived we can easily go back and read that. So we proved that hes a liar, but we are still considering his options. They lied, they got caught, DENIED!!!!!

So how does BGE's "smart meter" plan affect those residents who buy their electricity from other suppliers, WGE, PEPCO etc?

Robert - check out Jay's blog entry from 7/24. It touches on that very topic.

Post a comment

All comments must be approved by the blog author. Please do not resubmit comments if they do not immediately appear. You are not required to use your full name when posting, but you should use a real e-mail address. Comments may be republished in print, but we will not publish your e-mail address. Our full Terms of Service are available here.

Please enter the letter "k" in the field below:
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Wednesdays and Fridays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Resources and Sun coverage
Stay connected