Ritholtz: Bank stock surge shows taxpayer ripoff
More great stuff from Big Picture. Yesterday's bank-stock boom, Barry argues, is evidence that the latest bailout billons will go straight to bank shareholders and executives.
Consider this statement from Geithner, who said that Treasury is considering a “range of options” for its financial rescue plan, with the goal of preserving the private banking system. “We have a financial system that is run by private shareholders, managed by private institutions, and we’d like to do our best to preserve that system.”No! Defending these idiots was your old gig. In the new job, you no longer work for the cretins responsible for bringing down the global economy. Please stop rationalizing their behavior, and preserving the status quo!
Yesterday’s 13% surge in bank stocks is a clue as to what an obscene taxpayer giveaway this “bad bank” plan is — its free money for the firms that caused the problems, many of whom still have the same incompetent management in place that caused the problem. Purging toxic assets from bank balance sheets, without punishing the management, shareholders and creditors of these institutions for their horrific judgment will only encourage more of the same in the future. Its moral hazard writ large.
A few reminders for Geithner that are of the utmost importance:
You no longer work for the Banks: The NY Fed is a private corporation, doing the bidding of the FOMC and its private sector owners — primarily, the primary dealers. In other words, the President of the NY Fed works for the biggest commercial and investment banks in New York. That is no longer operational for you.
As Treasury Secretary, your immediate boss is the President, and your ultimate charge are the citizens of the United States, and the finances of the country.
When any conflict comes into play between the nation and the banks, you as Treasury Secretary are on the side of the Nation.
You cannot serve two masters, especially when they are in direct conflict with each other.







Comments
How can you call bank managers "incompetent" if they can keep dividends flowing and share value growing?
Shouldn't that be the only thing that matters?
Posted by: Observer | January 29, 2009 10:31 AM
These banks are insolvent, and are dependent upon government handouts.
Do you like the management that caused that?
"Hey, nice job guys, bankrupting the bank and then suckering in the taxpayers to pay for it."
No thanks . . .
Posted by: Barry Ritholtz | January 30, 2009 8:17 AM
If the bank managers are capable to transfer the statutory capital to the share holders and thereafter tap even more cash from taxpayers to the shareholders (and to their bonuses), shouldn't they be rather called geniuses?
It is the taxpayers' duty to rewrite the rules. The bank managers do exactly what thery are supposed to do.
Posted by: Observer | January 30, 2009 10:23 AM