baltimoresun.com

« August 2008 | Main | October 2008 »

September 30, 2008

NYT: Interview with the pirate

What a great story. The New York Times's Jeffrey Gettleman gets the hijackers of the Ukrainian weapons ship on their sat phone and interviews them.

[The pirates' spokesman] said that so far, in the eyes of the world, the pirates had been misunderstood. “We don’t consider ourselves sea bandits,” he said. “We consider sea bandits those who illegally fish in our seas and dump waste in our seas and carry weapons in our seas. We are simply patrolling our seas. Think of us like a coast guard.”
Posted by Jay Hancock at 8:42 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Ireland guarantees all liabilities of six Irish banks

This is extraordinary, if A Fistful of Euros is explaining it correctly. Dublin, AFOE says, has made

a dramatic government announcement that it is providing a public guarantee to all liabilities of banks with their HQs in the Republic of Ireland. That means every debt that these banks have to anyone: to their depositors, interbank lenders, and bondholders.

This sweeping guarantee far exceeds that of deposit insurance, and means that any wholesale lending to the Irish banks — the part of the banking system that is nearly stalled at the moment — is now secured by the Irish taxpayer. But foreign banks operating in Ireland, including Ulster Bank (owned by RBS), Rabobank (Dutch), and Postbank (part owned by, er, Fortis) are not covered. Any wholesale lender to these banks now has a strong incentive to switch to one of the six Irish HQ’d banks to get the guarantee.

The Brits aren't too happy about it, either, as the Times explains. Britain's deposit insurance is far less generous than the new Irish guarantee or U.S. deposit insurance. This'll persuade Brits to pull money from Barclays and whatnot and put it in British branches of Allied Irish and other banks.

Question: If Allied Irish still owned Baltimore-based Allfirst and Allfirst went bust, would Allfirst depositors exceeding U.S. guarantees be covered by the new Irish pledge?

Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:43 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Pass the bailout now

Today's column:

Congress will pass a bailout package. The stock and credit markets are making sure of that.

Sure, congressmen are loath to tell constituents right before the election that they spent taxpayer money rescuing prodigal fat cats. But they'll be even less eager to explain why they triggered what might be a titanic stock collapse, a lending Ice Age and the worst economic downturn since the Depression. If they need markets as political cover to placate voters who don't seem to get how much danger we're in, so be it. But bet on a package being passed later this week, a temporary recovery in stocks and then a long, painful recovery punctuated by more crises.

People in the Clinton administration used to complain about the "vigilante bond market" that punished policymakers with breathtaking plunges if it didn't get its way. But those troubles were a croquet match compared with what will happen if Washington doesn't move now.

Yesterday's 778-point tantrum by the Dow Jones Industrial Average was a mere preview. And stocks aren't where the main action is. If you want to be truly unnerved, talk to somebody who knows what's going on in the credit markets.

Read the whole thing here.

Highly recommended: David Brooks in today's NYT.

In 1933, Franklin Roosevelt inherited an economic crisis. He understood that his first job was to restore confidence, to give people a sense that somebody was in charge, that something was going to be done.

This generation of political leaders is confronting a similar situation, and, so far, they have failed utterly and catastrophically to project any sense of authority, to give the world any reason to believe that this country is being governed. Instead, by rejecting the rescue package on Monday, they have made the psychological climate much worse...

And let us recognize above all the 228 who voted no — the authors of this revolt of the nihilists. They showed the world how much they detest their own leaders and the collected expertise of the Treasury and Fed. They did the momentarily popular thing, and if the country slides into a deep recession, they will have the time and leisure to watch public opinion shift against them.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:43 AM | | Comments (4)
        

September 29, 2008

Buffett's Constellation buyout "on track" says Shattuck

This just out from Constellation Energy, owner of Baltimore Gas and Electric. The key: "we have not identified any issues" in CEG's trading book, says MidAmerican Energy. CEG is trading for $22.50, $4 under the MidAmerican buyout price.

DES MOINES, Iowa & BALTIMORE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Constellation Energy (NYSE: CEG - News) and MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company today announced that the merger between the two parties is proceeding as outlined in the merger agreement entered into on September 19, 2008.

"We continue to work very closely with MidAmerican to complete the due diligence process, file the merger application with the Maryland Public Service Commission and submit the proxy to the Securities and Exchange Commission,” said Mayo A. Shattuck, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Constellation Energy.

“We expect to complete our due diligence within the 14-day period, and based on information reviewed to date, we have not identified any issues,” said Greg Abel, President and Chief Executive Officer of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company. “We have completed a significant amount of due diligence to date and are very comfortable with the state of affairs of Constellation. We are working expeditiously with Constellation to move the merger approval process forward.”

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:35 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Yeah, they'll pass a bailout bill

The Dow is down 500 as I type this on news that the House rejected the bill. I think maybe another 500 points in the negative might be enough to get the deal done. Or 1,000? Ve have vays of making you bail.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:18 PM | | Comments (5)
        

Where does the bailout money come from?

A reader asks a good question:

With regard to the government's bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, I am curious to know where the trillions of dollars comes from. Do they arbitrarily manufacture an unlimited amount of paper money? Somewhere there must be a systyem of checks and balances. How does this work?

My answer:

The U.S. government will have to borrow another trillion dollars or so to finance all these bailouts. This will bring the total federal debt to around $11 trillion before too long. The only checks and balances come from the international economy. As long as people keep lending money to the United States, Congress will probably keep on borrowing it. The endgame would come when international lenders rebel, the dollar plunges, interest rates skyrocket and the United States becomes a second- or third-class debtor in the class of Argentina or Mexico. Nobody suggests we're near that stage, but with every trillion we borrow we're getting closer.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:00 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 26, 2008

How Maryland's real estate taxes compare nationally

The Tax Foundation is out with its list of the most expensive counties for residential property levies. Amounts are for 2007.

The highest as usual are the New York City suburbs, clocking in at a median annual tax of $7,000 or $8,000 per house. (Median means half the homes were taxed above those amounts and half below.) New York’s Westchester County tops the list at $8,422. New York, New Jersey, Connecticut and Illinois all have counties near the top of the rankings.

The U.S. county with the least expensive median real estate tax is Apache County, Arizona, at $133.

The most expensive Maryland county is Howard, with a median tax of $3,775. The least expensive in Maryland is Allegany County at $990.

Measuring property taxes in absolute dollars, however, only tells part of the story.
Taxes in Niagara County, N.Y., are only $2,802 per house. But as a percentage of home value they’re the highest in the nation at close to 3 percent.

Baltimore City has Maryland’s highest property tax as a portion of home value – 1.1 percent. Allegany County’s is nearly as high at 0.9 percent. Howard, Prince George’s, Baltimore and Frederick counties are all 0.8 percent. Everybody else is lower.

Ranked against other states, Maryland property taxes are 13th highest in the country in dollar terms, at $2,436 for the median house. But the state ranked 31st highest for property taxes as a percentage of home value and 22nd for property taxes as a percentage of homeowner income.

UPDATE: Commenters correctly point out that the Tax Foundation's tax rates as a percentage of home value for Maryland localities don't correspond to statutory rates. Baltimore City is way off -- 1.1 percent according to the foundation vs. a 2.3 percent real property tax rate on the books. I can't explain the discrepancy -- assessed value vs. market value? The foundation table's footnotes say all data are from the U.S. Census American Community Survey, using the median real estate tax paid on owner-occupied dwellings and the median value for those homes.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:41 AM | | Comments (5)
        

Hopkins economists against the bailout

Four economics professors at the Johns Hopkins University are on yesterday's petition against the bailout. They are:

Christopher Carroll, professor of economics

Hülya K. K Eraslan, associate professor of economics

Caroline Fohlin, research professor of economics

Stephen H. Shore, assistant professor of economics

Tiemen Woutersen, assistant professor of economics

Here is the petition:

To the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the President pro tempore of the Senate: As economists, we want to express to Congress our great concern for the plan proposed by Treasury Secretary Paulson to deal with the financial crisis. We are well aware of the difficulty of the current financial situation and we agree with the need for bold action to ensure that the financial system continues to function. We see three fatal pitfalls in the currently proposed plan: 1) Its fairness. The plan is a subsidy to investors at taxpayers’ expense. Investors who took risks to earn profits must also bear the losses. Not every business failure carries systemic risk. The government can ensure a well-functioning financial industry, able to make new loans to creditworthy borrowers, without bailing out particular investors and institutions whose choices proved unwise.


2) Its ambiguity. Neither the mission of the new agency nor its oversight are clear. If taxpayers are to buy illiquid and opaque assets from troubled sellers, the terms, occasions, and methods of such purchases must be crystal clear ahead of time and carefully monitored afterwards.

3) Its long-term effects. If the plan is enacted, its effects will be with us for a generation. For all their recent troubles, America's dynamic and innovative private capital markets have brought the nation unparalleled prosperity. Fundamentally weakening those markets in order to calm short-run disruptions is desperately short-sighted.

For these reasons we ask Congress not to rush, to hold appropriate hearings, and to carefully consider the right course of action, and to wisely determine the future of the financial industry and the U.S. economy for years to come.


Signed (updated at 9/25/2008 8:30AM CT)

Acemoglu Daron (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Adler Michael (Columbia University)
Admati Anat R. (Stanford University)
Alexis Marcus (Northwestern University)
Alvarez Fernando (University of Chicago)
Andersen Torben (Northwestern University)
Baliga Sandeep (Northwestern University)
Banerjee Abhijit V. (Massachussets Institute of Technology)
Barankay Iwan (University of Pennsylvania)
Barry Brian (University of Chicago)
Bartkus James R. (Xavier University of Louisiana)
Becker Charles M. (Duke University)
Becker Robert A. (Indiana University)
Beim David (Columbia University)
Berk Jonathan (Stanford University)
Bisin Alberto (New York University)
Bittlingmayer George (University of Kansas)
Boldrin Michele (Washington University)
Brooks Taggert J. (University of Wisconsin)
Brynjolfsson Erik (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Buera Francisco J. (UCLA)
Camp Mary Elizabeth (Indiana University)
Carmel Jonathan (University of Michigan)
Carroll Christopher (Johns Hopkins University)
Cassar Gavin (University of Pennsylvania)
Chaney Thomas (University of Chicago)
Chari Varadarajan V. (University of Minnesota)
Chauvin Keith W. (University of Kansas)
Chintagunta Pradeep K. (University of Chicago)
Christiano Lawrence J. (Northwestern University)
Cochrane John (University of Chicago)
Coleman John (Duke University)
Constantinides George M. (University of Chicago)
Crain Robert (UC Berkeley)
Culp Christopher (University of Chicago)
Da Zhi (University of Notre Dame)
Davis Morris (University of Wisconsin)
De Marzo Peter (Stanford University)
Dubé Jean-Pierre H. (University of Chicago)
Edlin Aaron (UC Berkeley)
Eichenbaum Martin (Northwestern University)
Ely Jeffrey (Northwestern University)
Eraslan Hülya K. K.(Johns Hopkins University)
Faulhaber Gerald (University of Pennsylvania)
Feldmann Sven (University of Melbourne)
Fernandez-Villaverde Jesus (University of Pennsylvania)
Fohlin Caroline (Johns Hopkins University)
Fox Jeremy T. (University of Chicago)
Frank Murray Z.(University of Minnesota)
Frenzen Jonathan (University of Chicago)
Fuchs William (University of Chicago)
Fudenberg Drew (Harvard University)
Gabaix Xavier (New York University)
Gao Paul (Notre Dame University)
Garicano Luis (University of Chicago)
Gerakos Joseph J. (University of Chicago)
Gibbs Michael (University of Chicago)
Glomm Gerhard (Indiana University)
Goettler Ron (University of Chicago)
Goldin Claudia (Harvard University)
Gordon Robert J. (Northwestern University)
Greenstone Michael (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Guadalupe Maria (Columbia University)
Guerrieri Veronica (University of Chicago)
Hagerty Kathleen (Northwestern University)
Hamada Robert S. (University of Chicago)
Hansen Lars (University of Chicago)
Harris Milton (University of Chicago)
Hart Oliver (Harvard University)
Hazlett Thomas W. (George Mason University)
Heaton John (University of Chicago)
Heckman James (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Henderson David R. (Hoover Institution)
Henisz, Witold (University of Pennsylvania)
Hertzberg Andrew (Columbia University)
Hite Gailen (Columbia University)
Hitsch Günter J. (University of Chicago)
Hodrick Robert J. (Columbia University)
Hopenhayn Hugo (UCLA)
Hurst Erik (University of Chicago)
Imrohoroglu Ayse (University of Southern California)
Isakson Hans (University of Northern Iowa)
Israel Ronen (London Business School)
Jaffee Dwight M. (UC Berkeley)
Jagannathan Ravi (Northwestern University)
Jenter Dirk (Stanford University)
Jones Charles M. (Columbia Business School)
Kaboski Joseph P. (Ohio State University)
Kahn Matthew (UCLA)
Kaplan Ethan (Stockholm University)
Karolyi, Andrew (Ohio State University)
Kashyap Anil (University of Chicago)
Keim Donald B (University of Pennsylvania)
Ketkar Suhas L (Vanderbilt University)
Kiesling Lynne (Northwestern University)
Klenow Pete (Stanford University)
Koch Paul (University of Kansas)
Kocherlakota Narayana (University of Minnesota)
Koijen Ralph S.J. (University of Chicago)
Kondo Jiro (Northwestern University)
Korteweg Arthur (Stanford University)
Kortum Samuel (University of Chicago)
Krueger Dirk (University of Pennsylvania)
Ledesma Patricia (Northwestern University)
Lee Lung-fei (Ohio State University)
Leeper Eric M. (Indiana University)
Leuz Christian (University of Chicago)
Levine David I.(UC Berkeley)
Levine David K.(Washington University)
Levy David M. (George Mason University)
Linnainmaa Juhani (University of Chicago)
Lott John R. Jr. (University of Maryland)
Lucas Robert (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)
Luttmer Erzo G.J. (University of Minnesota)
Manski Charles F. (Northwestern University)
Martin Ian (Stanford University)
Mayer Christopher (Columbia University)
Mazzeo Michael (Northwestern University)
McDonald Robert (Northwestern University)
Meadow Scott F. (University of Chicago)
Mehra Rajnish (UC Santa Barbara)
Mian Atif (University of Chicago)
Middlebrook Art (University of Chicago)
Miguel Edward (UC Berkeley)
Miravete Eugenio J. (University of Texas at Austin)
Miron Jeffrey (Harvard University)
Moretti Enrico (UC Berkeley)
Moriguchi Chiaki (Northwestern University)
Moro Andrea (Vanderbilt University)
Morse Adair (University of Chicago)
Mortensen Dale T. (Northwestern University)
Mortimer Julie Holland (Harvard University)
Muralidharan Karthik (UC San Diego)
Nanda Dhananjay (University of Miami)
Nevo Aviv (Northwestern University)
Ohanian Lee (UCLA)
Pagliari Joseph (University of Chicago)
Papanikolaou Dimitris (Northwestern University)
Parker Jonathan (Northwestern University)
Paul Evans (Ohio State University)
Pejovich Svetozar (Steve) (Texas A&M University)
Peltzman Sam (University of Chicago)
Perri Fabrizio (University of Minnesota)
Phelan Christopher (University of Minnesota)
Piazzesi Monika (Stanford University)
Piskorski Tomasz (Columbia University)
Rampini Adriano (Duke University)
Reagan Patricia (Ohio State University)
Reich Michael (UC Berkeley)
Reuben Ernesto (Northwestern University)
Roberts Michael (University of Pennsylvania)
Robinson David (Duke University)
Rogers Michele (Northwestern University)
Rotella Elyce (Indiana University)
Ruud Paul (Vassar College)
Safford Sean (University of Chicago)
Sandbu Martin E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Sapienza Paola (Northwestern University)
Savor Pavel (University of Pennsylvania)
Scharfstein David (Harvard University)
Seim Katja (University of Pennsylvania)
Seru Amit (University of Chicago)
Shang-Jin Wei (Columbia University)
Shimer Robert (University of Chicago)
Shore Stephen H. (Johns Hopkins University)
Siegel Ron (Northwestern University)
Smith David C. (University of Virginia)
Smith Vernon L.(Chapman University- Nobel Laureate)
Sorensen Morten (Columbia University)
Spiegel Matthew (Yale University)
Stevenson Betsey (University of Pennsylvania)
Stokey Nancy (University of Chicago)
Strahan Philip (Boston College)
Strebulaev Ilya (Stanford University)
Sufi Amir (University of Chicago)
Tabarrok Alex (George Mason University)
Taylor Alan M. (UC Davis)
Thompson Tim (Northwestern University)
Tschoegl Adrian E. (University of Pennsylvania)
Uhlig Harald (University of Chicago)
Ulrich, Maxim (Columbia University)
Van Buskirk Andrew (University of Chicago)
Veronesi Pietro (University of Chicago)
Vissing-Jorgensen Annette (Northwestern University)
Wacziarg Romain (UCLA)
Weill Pierre-Olivier (UCLA)
Williamson Samuel H. (Miami University)
Witte Mark (Northwestern University)
Wolfers Justin (University of Pennsylvania)
Woutersen Tiemen (Johns Hopkins University)
Zingales Luigi (University of Chicago)
Zitzewitz Eric (Dartmouth College)


Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:00 AM | | Comments (13)
        

RBC: We'll cover Ferris money-market losses

This out yesterday from the Royal Bank of Canada, which recently bought Baltimore investment firm Ferris Baker Watts. RBC will cover money-market losses for Ferris clients of up to 3 cents per share in the Primary Fund, which recently recorded a loss in net asset value -- a highly unusual outcome for a money market fund. Primary Fund, which was the main MM fund for Ferris clients, went from $1 per share to 97 cents. RBC says it is putting aside $35 million to cover Ferris client losses "up to 3 cents per share should clients receive less than $1.00 per share when the fund is liquidated."

RBC TO SUPPORT CLIENTS IMPACTED BY RESERVE FUND ISSUE NEW YORK, September 25, 2008 — Royal Bank of Canada (RY on TSX and NYSE) today announced that it has committed up to $35 million to protect clients who have invested in the Reserve Management Co. Primary Fund, a U.S. money market mutual fund managed by a third-party provider.

The Primary Fund recorded a net asset value (NAV) below $1.00 per share, by
recently reporting a NAV for The Primary Fund of $0.97 per share. Since then, assets
held by individual investors in the fund have been inaccessible.

RBC’s US Wealth Management unit, on behalf of its independent subsidiary,
Ferris, Baker Watts (FBW), last week initiated a redemption request for FBW client
assets invested in The Primary Fund and is taking this additional action to mitigate client
losses up to 3 cents per share should clients receive less than $1.00 per share when
the fund is liquidated.

Money market funds managed by RBC are not impacted by this issue. RBC is

confident in its ability to maintain the NAV of its money market funds.
“We are taking this step, in partnership with the Investment Executives at FB W,
to provide additional protection for the assets of FBW clients,” said John Taft, head of
US Wealth Management. “This is an example of RBC’s willingness to use its global
resources to address the needs and concerns of our wealth management clients during
this period of extraordinary market volatility.”
- 30 -
For more information, please contact:
John Bousquet, RBC Wealth Management, (612) 371-2225

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:23 AM | | Comments (2)
        

September 25, 2008

The huge gamble that will make all our money back

Fantastic post by Barry Ritholtz of Big Picture:

Having worked on the Sell side for the first decade of my Wall Street career, I am intimately familiar with the various pitches the retail [stockbroker] world uses to obtain clients and assets. There is not a single retail broker of my acquaintance that does not have Shafiroff's how-to on his bookshelf.

The reason I bring this up today is due to the latest sales pitch from various people, aggressively pushing the bailout plan. The newest spin on the massively expensive plan is "Hey, its a jumbo money maker!"

The spin reminds me of the classic retail stock jockey. The guy has buried his clients in a series of bad trades, bad judgment, poor risk management -- all motivated by his self-interested, commission-generating trades. The only way out of the money losing mess, pitches the broker, is a big, Hail Mary trade.

Sound familiar?

This technique is one of the last ones in the the Shafiroff book. Once an aggressive retail broker is upside down, the plea goes out for raising more money from the client. "Believe me, I hate being under water more than you. I pulled in some favors, this is the trade that makes it all back for us and then some. I could even get in trouble telling you this, so don't mention this to your pals. This is the one -- but I need you to send in more capital so we can recoup the prior trades that went bad on us."

I guess Paulson read the book in the early days of his career. That line of bull---t is identical to what the public is now being fed. A series of OpEds in the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal (and who knows where else) are all pushing the same nonsensical line: The bailout plan is a big money maker:

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:24 AM | | Comments (0)
        

Radio today: The country's path to bankruptcy

I'll be on Rodricks today on WYPR at 1:00 with Addison Wiggin, co-author of Empire of Debt, author of The Demise of the Dollar and producer of I.O.U.S.A., the new film on America's unsustainable fiscal course. We'll be touching on themes in this column:

SEPT. 24, 2028

Dear grandchildren:

Now that you're old enough to begin understanding the world you have inherited, let me try to explain what happened.

By rights, the United States should be in far better shape for you. But your elders failed to deliver "what is due to their posterity," in the words of a conservative British politician who thought about these things a long time ago.

It didn't happen all at once. Nobody intended to leave the country to the next generation diminished in influence and avoiding calls from debt collectors. But little by little, through negligence and appetite, the nation took from the future and gave to the present.


Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:43 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 24, 2008

Bush's legacy: Inflation or deflation?

The latest from Steve Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins.

The Bush Legacy: Inflation or Deflation?

Since 2001, the bush administration has entangled
the United States in a war that is undefined in terms of its
scope, scale and duration. It has also been interventionist
in the domestic economy, overseeing what the U.S.
Congressional Budget Office terms a “substantial increase in
spending” which has put the economy “on an unsustainable path.”

Indeed, according to the CBO’s baseline budget projections issued
in September 2008, the federal debt held by the public will grow to
$7.9 trillion (in 2008 dollars) over the next decade, a 46% increase
over this year’s $5.4 trillion estimate. And that’s only the tip of what
could be a huge debt iceberg. The trustees of the Social Security
System estimate that the present value of the system’s unfunded
liabilities is $13.6 trillion. A similar present value calculation by
the trustees of the Medicare System results in a whopping $85.6
trillion estimate. To put these numbers into perspective, keep in
mind that last year the United States generated a GDP of $13.8
trillion.

The Bush administration’s most recent economic intervention—
the nationalization of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac,


two giant government-sponsored mortgage finance companies— could cost U.S. taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars. Fannie and Freddie were not really private nor purely public—perhaps the worst type of hybrids imaginable. Indeed, both followed a classic public-private partnership (socialist) business model—one that privatizes profits and socializes losses. This was a train wreck waiting to happen. Not surprisingly, the Cato Institute’s Economic Freedom of the World, 2008 Annual Report records a significant fall in the economic freedom index for the U.S.

Given these developments and the squeeze that the credit
crunch has put on the U.S. economy, some people have been
shocked that the U.S. dollar has staged a spectacular rally against
the euro. But in the world of exchange rates, it takes two to tango.
Expectations about Europe’s economic prospects have turned
negative. Super-negative European expectations, relative to those
in the U.S., have pushed the dollar up by over 14% from July 15
to September 11, 2008. And not surprisingly, commodity prices
(measured by the Commodity Research Bureau’s Spot Index)
have tumbled by 9% over the same period. But consumer price
and producer price indexes remained
at elevated levels, registering year-overyear
increases in August of 5.4% and
9.6%, respectively.

Now the U.S. is on a razor’s edge
between deflation and inflation. This
requires one to think through how each
of these scenarios might unfold.
The prospect of a debt deflation
begins when a central bank pushes
interest rates below where the market
would have set them. This is exactly
what the Federal Reserve did. In July
2003, the Fed funds interest rate target
was pushed to a record low of 1%, where
it stayed for a year. This set off a credit
boom which fueled a massive increase
in leverage. Over the past year, we have
witnessed financial stress, a stampede
to deleverage and an economic slowdown.
These events could be the precursors
of a classic debt deflation.

It would take
the following course:
Debt liquidation would lead • to
distress selling.
• As loans are paid off, a contraction
in demand deposits would ensue.
• This would slow down the velocity
of money circulation.
• This would cause a fall in the
general level of prices.
• This would lead to a further fall in
the net worth of businesses and an increase in bankruptcies.
• A fall in profits, often resulting in losses, would also occur.
• This would lead to a reduction in output, trade and
employment.
• These losses, bankruptcies, and unemployment would
generate pessimism and a loss in confidence.
• These waves of pessimism would result in more hoarding
and further reductions in the velocity of money circulation.
• The debt deflation process would eventually run its course,
but only after asset prices have hit bargain basement levels.
Economists of the Austrian school of economics term this
type of debt deflation a “secondary deflation”. If the forces of a
secondary deflation are strong enough, a central bank’s liquidity
injections are rendered ineffective by what amounts to private
sector sterilization. When people expect prices to fall, their
demand for cash increases and soaks up central bank liquidity
injections. This phenomenon characterized Japan’s economy
during most of the 1990s.

But what if the Federal reserve—fearing a secondary deflation,
as they feared (incorrectly) a mild deflation in late 2002—pushed
the Fed funds rate lower (now it’s 2%)
and turned on the inflation switch
by monetizing more debt? Given the
growing mountain of government debt,
there is virtually an unlimited potential.
It’s a scenario worth thinking about.
To appreciate how the process
would work in the extreme, consider
what’s happening in Zimbabwe, the first
country to realize a hyperinflation (an
inflation rate of 50% or more per month)
in the 21st century. The government of
Zimbabwe issues debt and the Reserve
Bank of Zimbabwe monetizes it by
printing Zimbabwe dollars. While
the RBZ produces a lot of currency,
statistics on the quantity of currency in
circulation and the inflation rate are in
short supply. The most recent official
data for currency in circulation were for
January 2008, and inflation data were
last released for June 2008. To remedy
that shortcoming, I have developed a
hyperinflation index for Zimbabwe.

As indicated in the accompanying
table [not included], the monthly inflation rate on
September 5, 2008 was 9,914%. That’s
a whopping annual inflation rate of 36
billion percent.
To effectively trade currencies,
commodities, or for that matter, any
assets, traders must build alternative
scenarios—like those for deflation or
inflation. To give the scenarios life, probabilities must be attached
to each of them. The resulting array can then be used to inform, in
part, one’s trading activities.
Fortunately, three books are hot off the presses that will
greatly assist all traders who wish to engage in the necessary task
of scenario building. The authors are all market-tested veterans
with first-class minds and experienced hands.

• Brendan Brown, Bubbles in Credit and Currency: How
Hot Markets Cool Down. New York & London: Palgrave
Macmillan, 2008.

• Mohamed El-Erian, When Markets Collide: Investment
Strategies for the Age of Global Economic Change. New York:
McGraw-Hill, 2008

• David M. Smick, The World is Curved: Hidden Dangers to
the Global Economy. New York: Portfolio/Penguin Group
(U.S.A.), 2008.

Steve H. Hanke is a Professor of Applied Economics at The Johns
Hopkins University in Baltimore and a Senior Fellow at the Cato
Institute in Washington, D.C.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:25 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Should I answer this plea for help in transferring funds?

I got this in my email inbox this morning. Do you think it's a good deal?

Dear American:

I need to ask you to support an urgent secret business relationship with a transfer of funds of great magnitude.

I am Ministry of the Treasury of the Republic of America. My country has had crisis that has caused the need for large transfer of funds of 800 billion dollars US. If you would assist me in this transfer, it would be most profitable to you.

I am working with Mr. Phil Gram, lobbyist for UBS, who will be my replacement as Ministry of the Treasury in January. As a Senator, you may know him as the leader of the American banking deregulation movement in the 1990s. This transactin is 100% safe.

This is a matter of great urgency. We need a blank check. We need the funds as quickly as possible. We cannot directly transfer these funds in the names of our close friends because we are constantly under surveillance. My family lawyer advised me that I should look for a reliable and trustworthy person who will act as a next of kin so the funds can be transferred.

Please reply with all of your bank account, IRA and college fund account numbers and those of your children and grandchildren to wallstreetbailout@ treasury. gov so that we may transfer your commission for this transaction. After I receive that information, I will respond with detailed information about safeguards that will be used to protect the funds.

Yours Faithfully
Minister of Treasury Paulson

Thanks to the The Nation for the satire and to John in Hampden for forwarding it.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:30 PM | | Comments (1)
        

September 23, 2008

Breaking: Buffett's next bargain is Goldman Sachs

Buffett's putting at least $5 billion into Goldman, according to MarketWatch via Calculated Risk.

Just headlines from MarketWatch:

Goldman to sell $5 bln preferred stock to Berkshire Hathaway

Berkshire also to get $5 bln in Goldman common warrants

A Buffett rumor that is true!

Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:04 PM | | Comments (0)
        

WSJ: Taxpayers could get stakes in bailed-out firms

From the Wall Street Journal, on the bailout negotiations:

While details are still being worked out, both sides have also agreed to a measure that would allow -- but not require -- the Treasury to take an equity stake in a financial institution that sells assets to the government. Whether it did so might be dependent on the size of the capital injection the government makes when it buys the assets, according to a person familiar with the matter.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 4:40 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Bernanke: 'Essential to deal with the crisis at hand'

From Bernanke's prepared remarks before the Senate Banking Committee:

Despite the efforts of the Federal Reserve, the Treasury, and other agencies, global financial markets remain under extraordinary stress. Action by the Congress is urgently required to stabilize the situation and avert what otherwise could be very serious consequences for our financial markets and for our economy. In this regard, the Federal Reserve supports the Treasury’s proposal to buy illiquid assets from financial institutions. Purchasing impaired assets will create liquidity and promote price discovery in the markets for these assets, while reducing investor uncertainty about the current value and prospects of financial institutions. More generally, removing these assets from institutions’ balance sheets will help to restore confidence in our financial markets and enable banks and other institutions to raise capital and to expand credit to support economic growth.

At this juncture, in light of the fast-moving developments in financial markets, it is essential to deal with the crisis at hand. Certainly, the shortcomings and weaknesses of our financial markets and regulatory system must be addressed if we are to avoid a repetition of what has transpired in our financial markets over the past year. However, the development of a comprehensive proposal for reform would require careful and extensive analysis that would be difficult to compress into a short legislative timeframe now available.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:01 AM | | Comments (0)
        

Give taxpayers a piece of the bailout action

Today's column:

Now that American taxpayers are about to set up the biggest-ever vulture investment fund, let's make sure they get the same kind of action as Wall Street's traditional carrion fowl.

Vulture investors swoop in where other investors fear to go, providing cash to panicked sellers and keeping shaky markets from falling even further. But they have a price: a large share of the upside when things get back to normal.

Washington should demand nothing less from the banking institutions it is about to rescue. That means substantial government ownership of pieces of any company that gets bailed out.

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 8:51 AM | | Comments (1)
        

September 22, 2008

EDF: Constellation ignored our $35/share offer

The newest development. Filed at the SEC a few minutes ago: EDF says it had a $35 a share on the table last Wednesday, which Constellation Energy Group apparently rejected in favor of MidAmerican Energy's $26.50. Constellation's response will be interesting. Constellation is up to $28 as I write.

The terms of the Proposal Request submitted to the board of directors of Constellation included an immediate investment by Monday, September 22, 2008 of $1 billion through the purchase of non-voting preferred stock convertible into (i) 10.4% of Constellation voting equity and 5.6% of non-voting equity convertible into voting equity, and (ii) $750 million aggregate principal amount of 10% senior notes. The other terms and conditions of the Proposal Request were either the same as or in the aggregate more favorable to Constellation than the terms and conditions of the preferred stock investment proposed by MidAmerican and announced by MidAmerican and Constellation on the morning of Thursday, September 18, 2008. In addition, the Proposal Request offered the immediate commencement of negotiations of a merger agreement to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Constellation at a price of $35.00 per share and that such negotiations would be completed to permit execution of a definitive merger agreement by October 9, 2008. The Constellation board of directors has not responded to the Proposal Request. EDFI as a shareholder believes that the MidAmerican transaction does not provide adequate value to shareholders. EDFI remains committed to pursuing opportunities in the US nuclear industry and is reviewing all of its options with respect to increasing the value of its investment in Constellation for itself and Constellation's other shareholders.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:51 AM | | Comments (1)
        

The feeding frenzy begins

From today's NYT:

Even as policy makers worked on details of a $700 billion bailout of the financial industry, Wall Street began looking for ways to profit from it.

Financial firms were lobbying to have all manner of troubled investments covered, not just those related to mortgages.

At the same time, investment firms were jockeying to oversee all the assets that Treasury plans to take off the books of financial institutions, a role that could earn them hundreds of millions of dollars a year in fees.

Nobody wants to be left out of Treasury’s proposal to buy up bad assets of financial institutions.

“The definition of Financial Institution should be as broad as possible,” the Financial Services Roundtable, which represents big financial services companies, wrote in an e-mail message to members on Sunday.

The scope of the bailout grew over the weekend. As recently as Saturday morning, the Bush administration’s proposal called for Treasury to buy residential or commercial mortgages and related securities. By that evening, the proposal was broadened to give Treasury discretion to buy “any other financial instrument.”

Small banks, for example, are pushing the government to buy loans they made to home builders and commercial developers. Wall Street banks are lobbying to temporarily suspend certain accounting rules to avoid taking big losses on the assets they sell to Treasury, which would weaken them further.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:09 AM | | Comments (0)
        

New York Exchange bans short-selling Legg Mason

This morning the New York Stock Exchange expanded the list of financial companies that are temporarily immune to short selling. Legg Mason is among them, as is M&T Bank Corp. and General Motors (which has a huge finance wing). Shorting a stock is when you sell borrowed shares in the expectation the price will fall. If it does, you buy the shares at the lower price, remit the shares to the lender and make money. Gang short-selling is blamed for much of the trauma in recent days.

As of 10:20 Legg is down about $2.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:21 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 21, 2008

Crisis and government power: Quote of the day

"In the the time of economic crisis, when critical extensions of governmental power are likely to occur … there is little opportunity for a meaningful vote on whether or not, as a matter of principle, the powers of the state should be extended. Instead, there is likely to be an insistent demand for emergency action of some sort and relatively little consideration of what the permanent effect will be."

Economist Calvin Hoover, The Economy, Liberty and the State, 1959
Quoted in Robert Higgs, Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:40 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Bailout plan claims courts immunity

If you thought the Constitution and rule of law were under attack before under the Bush administration, consider this, in the draft bailout proposal:

Sec. 8. Review.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

Seems to challenge the 205-year old principle of judicial review that we all learned about in high school civics. (Marbury v. Madison.) The Bush administration long ago gave up any legitimate claim to being conservative. But this proposal is so presumptuous, so -- there is no other word -- radical, that it sort of reminds me of... of... the Democratic Maryland legislature.

(I'm thinking of the special General Assembly session two years ago when legislators tried to fire the Public Service Commission and seize money from Constellation Energy by fiat. The stakes -- both financial and legal -- are obviously much bigger in Washington. Crisis is the opportune time to seize power.)

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:05 PM | | Comments (4)
        

Report: EDF won't counteroffer on Constellation

Yesterday I linked to an AFP story on Electricite de France mulling its options on Constellation Energy Group, the Baltimore-based company that has agreed to be bought by Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy. The piece was in Les Echos. But Les Echos didn't include what La Tribune today says was AFP's report that EDF had decided not to make a counteroffer. AFP appears to be subscription only, so I can't access the original story.

EDF ne fera pas de contre-offre sur Constellation Energy

EDF will not make a counteroffer for Constellation Energy

Selon une source proche du dossier citée par l'Agence France Presse (AFP), les administrateurs d'EDF ont étudié une éventuelle contre-offre sur l'électricien américain, tête de pont de l'industrie nucléaire française aux Etats-Unis. Mais décision a été prise de renoncer finalement à cette éventualité.

According to a source close to the case cited by AFP, EDF's board has studied an eventual counteroffer for the American electricity company, EDF's bridgehead on the U.S. nuclear industry. But the decision was taken to definitively reject this possibility.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:54 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 20, 2008

EDF "takes note" of CEG's definitive deal with Buffett

EDF is sending signals it will take its time in deciding whether to make a counteroffer for Baltimore's Constellation Energy Group. Yesterday Les Echos was saying it wouldn't be surprising to see the the board of Electricite de France meet this weekend. Now the EDF flack is noting that the Buffett deal will take months to complete, implying that EDF is in no hurry. Or maybe they're just trying to sandbag Buffett, which is unlikely to work.

From an Agence France Press story in Les Echos this morning:

EDF has not had the time to make a counteroffer for Constellation Energy

Warren Buffett moved more quickly than the French group, which is a shareholder in the troubled American electricity company. The American billionaire reached a definitive agreement to buy Constellation for only $4.7 billion.

EDF, which did not launch a timely counteroffer, said Saturday that it "took note of the agreement" between Constellation Energy Group and the company owned by billionaire Warren Buffett, MidAmerican Energy, and continues to evaluate various options for continuing its nuclear development in the United States. "EDF takes note of the agreement reached between its partner Constellation Energy and MidAmerican, the implementation of which will take several months," said a spokeswoman for the French electricity group. "In this framework, EDF continues to evaluate its options with the objective of continuing its nuclear development in the United States," she added.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:00 AM | | Comments (0)
Categories: BGE/electricity
        

September 19, 2008

EDF confirms board meeting on Constellation

Carole Trivi, spokeswoman for Electricte de France, confirms that EDF is considering a new approach to Constellation Energy, parent of BGE. EDF had considered bidding for CEG two days ago as it approached collapse. Now, Trivi tells the Baltimore Sun:

"The board has met today in order to present different options regarding Constellation Energy."
She declined to say what options are being considered or whether a decision was made. But the French financial daily Les Echos says EDF is considering topping the bid of Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy Holdings, which has agreed to buy CEG. EDF is also considering working with Buffett to run CEG and MidAmerican, Les Echos says.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:09 PM | | Comments (1)
        

Paper: CEG counteroffer 'most likely' course for EDF

Les Echos is reporting that EDF is considering either trying to team up with Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy in some kind of joint venture with the combined MidAmerican/Constellation Energy or launching a counter-bid for the Baltimore company.

The critical paragrah from Les Echos, the French financial daily:

The other possibility, which seems this evening the most likely: launching a counter-offer. But in this case EDF will need outside support. Contacts have already been made with various potential allies. Several American electricity companies should be tempted by this opportunity, especially since, as is widely believed, Warren Buffett is acquiring Constellation at a price that does not reflect the instrinsic value of the company. On paper, there is therefore room for an escalation [in price]. If EDF is able to find a partner, EDF would be able, according to several sources, to pay between $1 billion and $2 billion [more] in this case.

One should not rule out that the group will get down to business this weekend.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:29 PM | | Comments (1)
        

French paper: EDF preparing counterbid for CEG

There's a meeting this evening to consider two courses for Electricite de France, the state-owned French power company that was considering a bid for Constellation Energy Group, owner of Baltimore Gas and Electric, reports Les Echos, a French financial daily. Possibility 1) Trying to team up with Warren Buffett, whose MidAmerican Energy Holdings won CEG for $26.50 a share. 2) Making a counter offer and topping Buffett's bid. CEG stock shot up to $26 from $22 where it was languishing this morning.
Here is the Les Echos link to the CEG story.
Thanks to Edward Bielarski for the tip.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:00 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Why is Constellation Energy selling for only $22?

CoveredCalls asks how come there is such a gap between CEG's trading price of $22 and the $26.50 Buffett has agreed to pay (cash!) for the shares:

I am a bit confused. If the sales is going to take place, why would the stock not be a bargin today at $22, today, when you know that when the deal closes you will be taken out at $26.50? What am i missing???

1) The sale has lots of regulatory hurdles and will take months to complete. Time value of money and all that.
But more importantly:
2) The deal could fall apart. Regulators could block it. Or MidAmerican beancounters might see something that scares them in the next two weeks when they go over CEG's trading book. Then they can pull the plug -- or offer a lower price. Read this paragraph from yesterday's agreement:

For a period of 14 days following the later of the execution of the Merger Agreement and the date the Company and the Purchaser agree that the Purchaser and its representatives have been given full access to the Company’s books and records relating to the retail and wholesale businesses, trading records and appropriate personnel, the Purchaser shall have the right to terminate the Merger Agreement if the Purchaser determines, in its sole discretion, that since June 30, 2008 either the retail and/or wholesale businesses or assets have materially deteriorated. The parties agree that an adverse change in the net economic value of such businesses or assets in excess of $200 million shall be deemed to be material for purposes of the Limited Due Diligence Termination Right.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:04 AM | | Comments (9)
        

September 18, 2008

MidAmerican not a bad partner for Constellation

Of all the companies Constellation could have been bought by, Warren Buffett's MidAmerican Energy Holdings seems to be a very good match. The two outfits don't overlap a lot. Buffett got the company at a sharp discount, which means there won't be so much pressure to trim costs. MidAmerican, which is majority owned but not wholly owned by Berkshire, doesn't have the kind of trading operation that Constellation has. Employees at Constellation's Baltimore Gas and Electric are unlikely to be affected, and this won't have any immediate impact on BGE customers, either.

Of course, BGE customers won't be able to relate to this from the Web site of MidAmerican Energy Co., the regulated Iowa utility. Iowa never deregulated MidAmerican. As a result:

The last electric rate increase MidAmerican Energy customers experienced was in 1995, and the company has committed to keeping electric rates – the cost per kilowatt-hour of electricity – stable in Iowa. The company does not have any plans to seek an electric rate increase for customers in Illinois and South Dakota.


Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:39 AM | | Comments (4)
        

CEG to be sold to be sold to MidAmerican

The press release:

DES MOINES, Iowa & BALTIMORE--(BUSINESS WIRE)--MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company and Constellation Energy (NYSE: CEG - News) today announced the companies have reached a tentative agreement in which MidAmerican will purchase all of the outstanding shares of Constellation Energy for a cash consideration of approximately $4.7 billion, or $26.50 per share. The companies expect to enter into a definitive merger agreement by close of business, Sept. 19. Upon signing a definitive merger agreement, Constellation Energy will issue $1 billion of preferred equity yielding 8 percent to MidAmerican.

The tentative agreement, which has been unanimously approved by both companies’ Boards of Directors, is subject to further due diligence, as well as shareholder and customary federal, state and local regulatory approvals. The transaction is expected to close within nine months.

“We strongly believe this transaction is in the best long-term interest of our investors, employees and the customers and communities we serve,” said Mayo A. Shattuck III, chairman, president and chief executive officer for Constellation Energy. “The financial services sector and energy commodity markets have witnessed unprecedented volatility. Backed by the significant industry expertise and financial stability of MidAmerican and Berkshire Hathaway, Constellation Energy will build on its reputation as a first-choice energy solution provider for our many customers.”

“MidAmerican has been a wonderful steward of its energy assets and the acquisition of Constellation Energy, when completed, will prove beneficial to all constituents,” said Warren E. Buffett, chairman, Berkshire Hathaway.

“In Constellation Energy, we have a partner that brings a world-class organization of people and an industry-leading collection of energy assets,” said Gregory E. Abel, president and chief executive officer of MidAmerican Energy Holdings Company. “MidAmerican is very comfortable with, and committed to, Constellation Energy’s current strategic plan. We intend, as with all of our investments, to allow Constellation Energy to operate autonomously as it pursues its long-term goals. Constellation Energy’s premier fleet of nuclear assets, and its UniStar joint venture with EDF, complements MidAmerican’s ongoing commitment to environmental initiatives, including investments in hydro, wind and geothermal energy. Joining forces with Constellation Energy accelerates our strategic initiative to develop and build energy infrastructure assets in North America.”

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:28 AM | | Comments (6)
        

September 17, 2008

Two papers now say France's EDF eyes CEG

The Financial Times has echoed an earlier Wall Street Journal report that Electricite de France is thinking about increasing its stake in Constellation Energy.

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Electricite de France SA is considering raising its stake in ailing Constellation Energy Group Inc. or may even launch a bid to take over the power company altogether, The Wall Street Journal reported late Wednesday on its Web site, citing people familiar with the situation.

FT:

EDF eyes Constellation bid

By Ed Crooks in London, Peggy Hollinger in Paris and Julie Mackintosh in New York
Wednesday Sep 17 2008 17:00
EDF is considering a bid for Constellation Energy (NYSE:CEG) , its US partner, even as it prepares finally to set the seal on a sweetened £12bn (€15bn) offer for British Energy, the UK's nuclear operator.

British Energy's board met on Monday and concluded that it was expected to be able to recommend the EDF offer. However, some technical details remain to be resolved and the deal could still collapse again at the last minute, as it did in July.

Meanwhile, the French group's board met in Paris yesterday to discuss the group's options for further investment in the US, where a crisis of confidence has sent its US partner's shares crashing in the past few weeks. EDF earlier this month doubled its stake to 9.51 per cent in Constellation, which was to have been its entry into the potentially lucrative US nuclear relaunch.




Posted by Jay Hancock at 7:57 PM | | Comments (1)
        

Mid-August: Constellation's first stumble

This column from Aug. 15, when CEG's stock began tanking after it revealed it had miscalculated collateral contingencies, helps explain what's going on.

A few sentences on page 46 of a financial disclosure that did not change reported profits, sales or net worth caused Constellation Energy Group's prospects to go into brownout this week.

Its shares dropped 16 percent Tuesday. Analysts rushed to downgrade the stock, although one contrarian changed his recommendation from "underperform" to "hold" because the shares had fallen so far.

Standard & Poor's downgraded Constellation bonds to two steps above "junk" status.

A little jumpy, aren't we? Not at all.

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:06 PM | | Comments (0)
        

What could have gone wrong at Constellation?

You leave the Web for 12 hours and look what happens. Who would have thought the financial world’s next holy guacamole moment would happen in Baltimore? Obviously a potential ratings downgrade has triggered a Constellation Energy liquidity crisis -- or vice versa. Translation: Rating agencies, shareholders and lenders fear it may run short on cash to carry out day-to-day operations. But we have no idea what’s causing it yet.

What’s clear is that Constellation’s reliance on borrowed money is putting it in dire straits. Much like many Wall Street firms that have run into problems, Constellation uses short-term loans to play the markets – in its case, mainly commodities such as wholesale electricity and natural gas. A huge portion of its profits – we don’t know exactly how huge – has depended on this play. Two things could have gone wrong: 1) A critical trading blowup or 2) A perception by shareholders, lenders and rating agencies that the cheap, easy money Constellation needs to play the market won’t be there in the future.

What’s a trading blowup? When you make a bad bet, lenders demand more collateral. When you make a really bad bet, you run out of collateral to post, which causes lenders to pull the plug, which threatens the whole enterprise.

We don’t know that this is what’s going on. But it’s one explanation given the plunge in

Constellation’s stock and the company’s apparent decision to put itself up for sale. Constellation had wagered on rising energy prices through the first half of the year. It was the right bet, and profits looked good at the end of June. But in July energy started to crater. If Constellation remained “long” energy after July, that might help explain what’s going on. But it’s speculation.

The alternative scenario is that Constellation lenders are simply declining to roll over its loans in order to lower their risk, and it’s snowballing. One lender makes a prudent move. A rating agency starts to worry. The second lender worries a credit drought will hurt Constellation’s liquidity, and it becomes self-fulfilling.

There has been much worry that Constellation was owed money by Lehman Brothers or AIG or some other firm that just collapsed. This week Constellation said the Lehman collapse wouldn’t cause it any problems. And AIG got bailed out last night, so it is honoring its commitments. In any event, it’s hard to imagine that such “counterparty risk” could threaten Constellation enough to seek to sell itself.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 1:38 PM | | Comments (20)
Categories: BGE/electricity
        

September 16, 2008

Constellation Energy recovers some of its losses

Now it's down "only" $14 to $34 per share. Just before 2 p.m. there was a trade for $13 a share. And still no news on what's causing it, except speculation that Constellation will be left holding the bag in a Wall Street default.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:44 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Constellation Energy plunges $32 today

In the last two days stock in BGE owner Constellation Energy Group has plunged by more than 60 percent. It's down $32 so far today in intraday trading. The stock has fallen $15 just in the past few minutes. It must be related to speculation about CEG's complicated commodity and energy trading operations and its potential exposure to the extraordinary developments on Wall Street. But no further explanation so far.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 2:00 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Constellation Energy falls again today

Yesterday shares in BGE owner Constellation Energy plunged $10 on speculation that Constellation was owed money by Lehman Brothers, the Wall Street trading firm that just entered bankruptcy proceedings. As Hanah Cho reports in today's Baltimore Sun, Constellation said late yesterday that Lehman posed it no danger.

Constellation Energy Group worked to reassure Wall Street yesterday that its wholesale energy and credit relationships with Lehman Brothers will not have a "material adverse effect" on the Baltimore company, which saw its shares lose 18 percent amid a broader market sell-off.

Reassurance is not what appears to have happened. Constellation is down another $4 this morning.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:04 AM | | Comments (1)
        

September 15, 2008

Constellation Energy: Lehman collapse won't hurt us

BGE owner Constellation Energy saw its stock plunge $10 today on speculation that the bankruptcy filing by Lehman Brothers will leave Constellation holding the bag for some commodity trades. Constellation says no. From an 8K that just landed at the SEC:

Constellation, Constellation Commodities and BGE believe the Lehman bankruptcy and the possible resulting effects on subsidiaries of Lehman will not have a material adverse effect on the Company or its subsidiaries individually or collectively.

Constellation Commodities is a counterparty with Lehman Brothers Commodity Services Inc. (“Lehman Commodity Services”) and Eagle Energy Partners 1, LP (“Eagle Energy”), subsidiaries of Lehman, in wholesale energy marketing transactions. The obligations of Lehman Commodity Services and Eagle Energy are guaranteed by Lehman, and the Lehman bankruptcy filing gives Constellation Commodities the right to terminate the transactions. As of September 15, 2008, Constellation Commodities did not have any direct net credit exposure to Lehman Commodity Services or Eagle Energy, based on existing contracts and current market prices.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 5:53 PM | | Comments (3)
        

Today's GOOD financial news

There is some. Reuters reports it here. It will (eventually) help relieve the crisis.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:41 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 14, 2008

Bank of America buying Merrill, Lehman sinks

Holy Moly. Everybody knew Lehman was struggling for survival. But when I saw this headline on a blog: "Merrill Lynch agrees to sell itself to Bank of America," I thought it was April Fool's Day. Here is the NYT story on the developments. Nouriel Roubini, who was among the loudest in predicting historic mayhem from the mortgage meltdown, can now say "I told you so" 10 times over. This is the most extraordinary time in financial history since the prologue to the Great Depression. Let's hope the outcome is different.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:09 PM | | Comments (2)
        

September 12, 2008

Franchot's retort: A 2,000-year-old rhetorical trick

As you know, Senate President Mike Miller and Comptroller Peter Franchot are engaged in an epistolary duel. Miller sends a letter saying Franchot has an "obsession with the press," clings to "the worst habits of a novice elected official" and disregards "the relationships you need to be an an effective leader."

Franchot responds by saying Annapolis is "broken" and "dysfunctional." Then he promises to take a higher road than Miller did and to not make things personal:

In light of your correspondence, in which you questioned my motives, credibility, integrity, seriousness and effectiveness as a public servant, I'll confess that I was tempted to respond in kind. I was tempted to compare my 22-year record of public service with yours as Senate President, one in which your formidable legislative prowess has often been overshadowed by intemperate public remarks, acrimonious personal feuds, unconditional fealty to the interests of the national gambling industry, and stories of brass-knuckle political tactics that would cause the hardest-bitten of Tammany Hall ward-heelers to blush. However, in the interest of restoring civility and purpose to the public debate, I won't go there.

"I won't go there." But he just did! Rhetoric fans will swoon. It's the old, "I will not demean this debate by mentioning my opponent's spouse-beating conviction" trick. Called paralipsis, it was perfected by no less a personage than Marcus Tullius Cicero, the great Roman lawyer, politician and orator. Franchot gives it classic form. By mentioning what he declares should not be mentioned, the paralipsis practitioner skirts the gutter while seeming to walk on the heights. I can't imagine it's especially effective with modern audiences.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:36 PM | | Comments (19)
        

Fannie, Freddie, tell us again: Don't buy employer stock

The collapse of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Lehman Brothers furnishes another opportunity to teach an investment lesson that still hasn’t been well learned and, for many people, never will be.

Diversify. Diversify. Diversify. And don’t put your 401(k) money in stock of the company you work for.

At mortgage giant Freddie Mac, about 8 percent of the money employees held in their 401(k) retirement plans was invested in Freddie stock at the end of 2006, Dow Jones Newswires reported this week.

Since then the shares have fallen from $34 to 45 cents. Millions of dollars in savings that people thought would be available for their retirement got wiped out. What’s worse, Freddie almost certainly will start to shrink and lay off some of the same people.

Managers at Fannie, another mortgage behemoth, wisely decided not to offer a company-stock elective for employees’ 401(k). But Fannie also had an employee stock ownership plan, which had $100 million in assets, mostly in Fannie shares, Dow Jones said. Those shares have followed Freddie into the toilet.

Lehman Brothers employees who loaded up on that company’s shares have also gotten plastered, and many will soon find themselves unemployed.

You’re already dependent on your employer for income. Don’t double the risk by putting your savings in the same basket.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:19 PM | | Comments (1)
        

'Depression' predictions mean it's almost time to buy

Can the turnaround be far away if financial seers are starting to predict a U.S. depression? It may not be time to buy stocks yet, but this is a signal that it's getting closer. This is from a Thursday CNBC interview with Martin Hennecke, of Hong Kong-based Tyche Group.

The end result of the global economic slowdown may be the U.S. announcing national bankruptcy as the government cannot afford the bailouts that it promised and the market will not bail out the government, Martin Hennecke, senior manager of private clients at Tyche, told CNBC on Thursday.

"We expect a depression in the United States. We expect a depression, very possibly, also in Europe," Hennecke said on "Worldwide Exchange."

The estimated $300 billion cost of the Fannie/Freddie bailout will probably be considered as a loss that the government will have to take, therefore passing it on to taxpayers, he explained.

"We already have $3 trillion of debt, as far as the U.S. government is concerned. These debt figures across the U.S. economy are rising very sharply."

When the government can no longer pass the United States' "immense debt" on to taxpayers, it will turn to the holders of U.S. dollars, leading to the eventual downfall of the currency, Hennecke said.

"Definitely, it (the dollar) is not a safe place to be invested in, as real inflation is closer to 10 or 11 percent than the actual inflation numbers given by the U.S. government," Hennecke said on "Worldwide Exchange".

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:36 AM | | Comments (7)
        

September 11, 2008

Cool chart: Exports from Baltimore & everywhere else

This story in the Wall Street Journal makes that case that U.S. export growth has contributed greatly to the economy recently, keeping it from performing even more poorly than it already is. Included is this cool export map, which shows region-by-region exports and tells us that, in 2006, metro Baltimore sold almost $5 billion in exports, an amount that comes to nearly 4 percent of the regional economy. EXPORTS.gif
Posted by Jay Hancock at 1:52 PM | | Comments (0)
        

The Fannie Freddie bailout is starting to work

This is step No. 1 in something like a 27-step process that has to happen for the financial crisis to end. It's only step 1, but it's a step.

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Rates on 30-year mortgages dropped sharply this week, falling to the lowest level in five months, as the government's dramatic takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac had the hoped-for impact of lowering mortgage rates.

Freddie Mac reported Thursday that its nationwide survey found that 30-year, fixed-rate mortgages dipped to 5.93 percent this week, down from 6.35 percent last week.

The sharp decline pushed the 30-year rate below 6 percent for the first time since late May and marked the lowest level for this rate since they averaged 5.88 percent the week of April 17.

Private economists had predicted that the government's move on Sunday to take control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac would result in lower mortgage rates for consumers because it removed a huge uncertainty about the future of the two firms, which own or guarantee half of the nation's mortgages.

Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody's Economy.com, said Thursday that he believed rates could keep falling and perhaps drop to around 5.5 percent on the 30-year mortgage, which would give a further boost to the battered housing market.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 1:23 PM | | Comments (0)
        

September 10, 2008

Obama: Shrink parting gifts for Fannie/Freddie CEOs

From the New York Times:

Senator Barack Obama and two other prominent Democrats urged federal housing regulators on Tuesday to cut the golden parachutes of the ousted leaders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, another sign that the government bailout of those mortgage giants could reverberate through the presidential campaign.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 1:33 PM | | Comments (1)
        

Should Legg's Bill Miller step aside?

Today's column:

Legg Mason's Bill Miller isn't getting any love for his stock-picking. But perhaps we should admire him for his titanium stomach, in the way people appreciate snake charmers or Evel Knievel.

At a time when every other mutual-fund jockey is trying desperately to keep his or her job by playing it safe, losing only as much as the overall market and hoping no one notices, Miller refuses to take off his crash helmet.

His disastrous, repeated bets on housing and mortgage stocks have put Legg's flagship mutual fund in the ratings basement. The latest and most spectacular blooper was buying dead-meat mortgage financier Freddie Mac just before the government seized it Sunday and rendered its shares nearly worthless.

Unfortunately, Legg shareholders and clients aren't just watching from the stands. Miller has lost them billions. Something is wrong if there aren't serious discussions at 100 Light St. about shrinking his responsibilities or parting company.

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:29 AM | | Comments (7)
        

September 8, 2008

Provident, 1st Mariner own no Fannie/Freddie preferred

My colleague Hanah Cho contacted area banking companies today to see if they own preferred stock in Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. These big mortgage companies just got taken over, and the preferred has cratered. Fannie/Freddie preferred is a common, "safe" asset that many banks hold as investments. The FDIC is worried that preferred writedowns will jeopardize some banks' capital ratios. Some are predicting an acceleration in bank failures. No new is good news so far. From First Mariner Bank:

1st Mariner Bank does not own preferred shares of either Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

From Provident Bank:

We do not own any preferred shares of Freddie Mac or Fannie Mae.

Wells Fargo, however, cannot make the same statement.


Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:31 PM | | Comments (1)
        

The moral meaning of economic terms in the media

From Bluematter. Funny, and hits home. The joke is that most of the "good" items (foreign direct investment, affordable houses) necessarily come with the "bad" stuff (current account deficit, falling house prices) at the same time. But you rarely hear this (not so subtle) subtlety explained in articles/TV pieces.

The moral content of economic terminology in the popular press: A guide

Foreign direct investment (inbound): Good
Current account deficit: Bad
Trade deficit: Catastrophic
Capital account deficit: Not used. Presumably bad.

Weak national currency: Bad
Exports: Good
Imports: Bad

Rising house prices: Good
Falling house prices: Bad
Affordable houses: Good
Unaffordable houses: Bad

Free trade: Neutral
Unfettered free trade: Bad
Fair trade: Good
Outsourcing: Evil
Buying local produce: Divine

Pay rises: Good
Low interest rates: Good
Inflation: Bad

Communism: Very Bad
Socialism: Bad
Capitalism: Bad


Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:55 PM | | Comments (0)
        

Outliers: The next Malcolm Gladwell book

From Malcolm Gladwell, who blends economics and sociology and all sorts of other cool stuff, a new book called Outliers: The Story of Success. From the publishers' pitch on Amazon:

In this stunning new book, Malcolm Gladwell takes us on an intellectual journey through the world of "outliers"--the best and the brightest, the most famous and the most successful. He asks the question: what makes high-achievers different? His answer is that we pay too much attention to what successful people are like, and too little attention to where they are from: that is, their culture, their family, their generation, and the idiosyncratic experiences of their upbringing. Along the way he explains the secrets of software billionaires, what it takes to be a great soccer player, why Asians are good at math, and what made the Beatles the greatest rock band.

Another look at the intelligence/success/competence bell curve, it looks like. Only with a focus on the right-hand side of the chart instead of the left-hand side. Or, if you like, Gladwell's book could be similar to Chris Anderson's The Long Tail -- except it seems to be about human talent rather than marketing concepts and business models.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 3:29 PM | | Comments (4)
        

Fannie/Freddie bailout will cause some banks to fail

Numerous banks own Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac common and preferred shares as part of their increasingly thin capital cushions. Those shares are getting hammered thanks to the government's nationalization of the mortgage giants yesterday. (Washington has basically taken over most of the ownership of Fannie and Freddie, leaving private investors with thinner slices that aren't worth nearly as much as they once were.)

When banks write down these shares to their fair value, some won't have enough capital left to continue. They will be taken over by the FDIC. Via Calculated Risk, we get this overlooked dispatch from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. which insures bank deposits:

The federal banking agencies have been assessing the exposures of banks and thrifts to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The agencies believe that, while many institutions hold common or preferred shares of these two government-sponsored enterprises, a limited number of smaller institutions have holdings that are significant compared to their capital.

The Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Office of Thrift Supervision are prepared to work with these institutions to develop capital-restoration plans pursuant to the capital regulations and the prompt corrective action provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act.

All institutions are reminded that investments in preferred stock and common stock with readily determinable fair value should be reported as available-for-sale equity security holdings, and that any net unrealized losses on these securities are deducted from regulatory capital.

Calculated Risk says: "Expect more bank failures."

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:58 AM | | Comments (0)
        

Fannie Mae down to $1 a share

Ouch ouch ouch ouch. Fannie Mae shares fell to $1 this morning on news that the government will take over the company and much of its ownership. Brother Freddie Mac is down to $1.40. Legg Mason, which owns a huge piece of Freddie, is up $1.25 to close to $46. The thinking: Legg's funds will get killed by the Freddie implosion, but if the bailout leads to an overall financial recovery, Legg's boat will rise, too.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:01 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 7, 2008

Tomorrow's piece on Fannie and Freddie

Top of a piece that will be in Monday's newspaper:

The government bailed out mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac yesterday, belying dozens of Fannie and Freddie executives who said year after year that such a thing would never -- could never -- happen.

"The U.S. government does not guarantee, directly or indirectly, our securities or other obligations," Fannie said in its last annual report. "We are a stockholder-owned organization, and our business is self sustaining and funded exclusively with private capital."

The companies are about to receive what we can conservatively estimate will be tens of billions in taxpayer dollars. That's not private capital.

But whatever the total bill, however maddening it may be to lose again in Wall Street's "heads I win, tails taxpayers lose" version of capitalism, the price is worth it. The cost of doing nothing would have been higher...

Posted by Jay Hancock at 6:45 PM | | Comments (0)
        

September 6, 2008

Will Fannie - Freddie shareholders get wiped out?

The impending government bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the wounded mortgage giants, would "replace the leaders of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and virtually wipe out their shareholders," says the New York Times.

The Washington Post, on the other hand, sez: "The value of the companies' common stock would be diluted but not wiped out, while the holdings of other securities, including company debt and preferred shares might be protected by the government."

Which is it? And which big Fannie/Freddie shareholders have been burning up the phone lines to Treasury arguing that they, and not just the bondholders and owners of preferred, should get free money from taxpayers? Usually in a bankruptcy -- that's what this is, and it is the most stunning development yet in the mortgage meltdown -- the shareholders are nuked.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:44 AM | | Comments (0)
        

September 5, 2008

Falling natural gas prices to help winter heating bills

The plunging price of natural gas is good news for home heating bills this winter, but I don’t see anybody offering deals to lock in a price that reflects the decline. Your best bet is probably to float with BGE’s standard monthly rate instead of locking in a price with a competitive supplier.

Baltimore Gas and Electric passes along a “commodity” gas price that varies with the wholesale market. It also charges a distribution fee.

After popping to $1.58 per therm in July, BGE’s September commodity price is back down to $1.02. (This is the default price everybody pays unless they choose to switch to a competitive supplier.) And unless Hurricane Ike messes with Gulf Coast petro-production the way Hurricane Katrina did, prices should fall further as it gets colder.

At least, that’s what Wall Street says. Last week, in the forward market, natural gas for January delivery was selling for about 85 cents per therm. Gas has followed the price of oil downward after both peaked this summer.

But a one-year deal from Washington Gas Energy Services had a commodity price of $1.32 per therm for BGE customers. (You still pay the distribution fee to BGE.) Even if you’re afraid prices will pop up to $1.58 again or higher, that’s a heck of a premium to pay for the insurance.

Despite the decline, the price of gas still hasn’t fallen to where it was when last winter began.
BGE’s commodity price was between 90 cents and a dollar until April, when it started spiking. People who locked in at $1 per therm – last fall’s fixed price from the independents – missed some savings over the winter but were spared the summer highs.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:01 AM | | Comments (4)
Categories: BGE/electricity
        

Allegany Chamber fails to endorse slots

The Allegheny Allegany County Chamber of Commerce didn't oppose slots at its board meeting. But it didn't endorse them, either, as has the Maryland Chamber of Commerce. Sez the Allegheny Allegany Chamber:
At the regularly scheduled meeting of the Board of Directors of the Allegany County Chamber of Commerce, the slots referendum was the focus of discussion. The Board supports the use of funds from slots, should they become legal, to help fund the educational needs throughout the state. However, as a business advocate, and with the best interest of the general public at heart, the Board decided it does not have enough information on the positive and negative economic impact on local business or the general public to be able to give support to the referendum. Issues such as payments to the County, placing such an establishment on public ground, negative social effects, and possible impact to local businesses will continue to be researched by the Chamber.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:42 AM | | Comments (2)
        

September 4, 2008

Praising, panning proposals to lower drinking age

A quick Google News search pops up many editorials and columns from non-college papers against lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18, as many college presidents have suggested. Pieces favoring the idea, such is this one from The Depauw, Indiana, are more typical of college student papers:

The DePauw:

Opponents of the Amethyst Initiative cannot, must not believe that pounding shots of Kamchatka or Ronrico in a crowded freshman dorm room is the safest way for the children of our country to be initiated into the drinking class. The alternatives should feel much more comforting and conjure images of Americana and family: a glass of wine here and there at Thanksgiving or Easter feasts, a mug of eggnog at a yuletide gala or a bottle of Corona at Cheeseburger in Paradise. Moderation, a virtue nearly absent on this campus, is of principal importance to safe drinking habits.


The Daily Republic of Mitchell, South Dakota:

Anyone who has been to college in the last 20 years can tell you that binge drinking has little to do with the age limit. To me it is a copout by college presidents and trying to shift a problem on college campuses to anyone but themselves.

The Dallas Morning News:

Scholarly studies abound about why lowering the drinking age is a bad idea, including several showing a direct correlation between alcohol-related traffic fatalities and lower drinking ages. The real solution is a cultural one — valuing moderation and stigmatizing excess. But until that happens — and as long as all-night keggers and Jell-O shot competitions are the rage — current law is exactly where it needs to be.

Seattle Post Intelligencer:

If the drinking age were lowered from 21 to 18, an initiative currently endorsed by the heads of about 100 colleges and universities nationwide, picture this: Across the country, freshmen will suddenly shun an extra cup of suds from the frat-house keg and refuse one more dip into the Everclear punch. On quarter-beer night, they will return to their dorms with change still jingling in their pockets.

Dodge City [Kansas] Daily Globe:

Binge drinking and alcohol abuse are serious problems on campuses and must be addressed. But university leaders could perhaps more appropriately do so by working together on educational responsible-drinking campaigns. If the presidents’ core issue is safety and health, then the data speaks for itself. The 21 law saves lives.

Walton [Georgia] Tribune:

The presidents of about 100 colleges and universities recently called on federal lawmakers to consider lowering the drinking age from 21 to 18.

That’s right. The leaders of the some of the nation’s largest and most respected educational institutions believe their campuses would be safer places for students to attend if those students could start legally getting blitzed as freshman rather than having to wait until their junior or senior years.

Really?

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:26 AM | | Comments (0)
        

The best economic news of the year

Holy cow! U.S. economic output per worker (labor productivity) grew at a 4.3 percent annual rate in the second quarter, the Labor Department said this morning. That's the third-best quarterly showing in four years. The figure was a sharp upward revisions from previous estimates. Rising productivity means more production from each laborer, which means higher corporate profits and (theoretically) higher wages. When you can produce more stuff (whether it's opening bank accounts or making steel) with each hour of labor, theoretically you should be paid more.

True, most productivity gains the past 10 years have accrued to profits, not wages and salaries. Even so, healthy productivity gains are preferable to the opposite under any circumstances. When productivity flags, so does total output. When productivity flags, inflation and high interest rates kick in. This is a sign that the technology-enabled productivity boom that began in 1996 hasn't ended.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:36 AM | | Comments (1)
        

September 3, 2008

Little-known VP nominees: Palin and Agnew

As many have pointed out, Maryland's Spiro Agnew was also a surprise vice presidential nominee with a thin resume from a small state. Agnew's selection was on a track even faster than Palin's. The choice was announced at noon on Aug. 8, 1968, and Agnew was nominated that night by the Republican convention. The echoes are interesting. From the New York Times, Aug. 10, 1968:

Nixon Defends His Choice

Nominee Hails Ticket

In his first public defense of his controversial running mate, Richard M. Nixon described Spiro T. Agnew today as "one of the most underrated political men in America." Citing the Maryland Governor's "poise under pressure," the Republican nominee declared: "When it comes to carrying the attack and resisting the attack, he's got it. You can look him in the eye and you know he's got it. People say he's not known. That's nonsense in this day and age. He's known now, and as the campaign goes on he'll become better known."...

Mr. Nixon conceded that his running mate would encounter criticism.
"The stakes are high and they'll hang him. But you watch him"

"Under pressure he is one of the best," Mr. Nixon said of Mr. Agnew, his personal choice for the ticket. "He has a good heart. He's an old-fashioned patriot, highly controlled."...

[Nixon] said that he had been impressed with Mr. Agnew's experience as Baltimore County Commissioner [sic. It was Baltimore County Executive], his record as Governor, and his experience in dealing with urban problems.

When the storm broke yesterday over Mr. Agnew's appointment, the Nixon staff members took pains to say that Mr. Nixon had not bowed to the South's demands or taken a sudden turn to the right...

Among the former Vice President's [Nixon's] guests was the evangelist Billy Graham, dressed in orange shirt and yellow slacks. The two later walked to a putting green for some practice shots.

Wearing his favorite sport jacket -- a blue and black checkered one -- Mr. Nixon briefly played the piano while his guests gathered around and sang, "Let Me Call You Sweetheart" and "Home on the Range."


Posted by Jay Hancock at 12:17 PM | | Comments (1)
        

The $170 BGE rebate is almost here

You should be seeing Baltimore Gas and Electric's $170 rebate on your home electricity bill in the next few days/weeks. The paper is working on a story. As BGE said in May: "Baltimore Gas and Electric Company (BGE), a subsidiary of Constellation Energy (NYSE: CEG), today announced that residential electric distribution customers with active accounts on Aug. 29, 2008 will receive a one-time credit of $170 on their Sept. 2008 bill..."

My bill usually comes early in the month, around the 7th or so. The cool August weather should have kept kilowatt charges relatively sane for the September bill. The rebate will help even more. When you add up the 1.1 million BGE households, it's a mini, $187 million stimulus package for the Maryland economy.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:47 AM | | Comments (4)
        

Greg Mankiw ask of Facebook: Why?

Harvard's Greg Mankiw, former chairman of President Bush's Council of Economic Adivisors, asks what many are wondering.

I now have over 2500 friends on facebook. Call me a pushover: I am ready to befriend anyone. (Try me again if, inadvertently, I have ever ignored your request in the past).

The problem is, I have no idea what it all means.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:28 AM | | Comments (0)
        

How 'smugglers' depress Maryland's sales-tax revenue

Today's column:

State bean counters blame the crash in sales-tax collections on high gas prices and a weak economy.

I bet there's something else going on. In January, Maryland's sales-tax rate rose by a fifth. To 6 percent. If you don't think that's compelling more people to avoid the tax by shopping on the Web or driving to "tax-free" Delaware, keep reading.

Given Maryland's budget hole, raising the sales tax from 5 percent to 6 percent was probably necessary. But as much as small states such as Maryland like to steer their own destinies, forces from across the border often cause detours. The disappointing sales-tax haul shows the perils of running Maryland as if a Great Wall of O'Malley girded the state and banished the outside world.

What's undermining sales taxes is the same thing that's hurting Maryland's tobacco-tax collections. Smuggling.

Nobody uses the word when it comes to sneaking in a tax-free plasma TV from Delaware's Christiana Mall or buying a diamond ring from ice.com. But it amounts to the same thing in both cases. Consumers might not know that when they shop across state lines to save on sales tax, they still owe Maryland the money if they bring the wares back home.

Read the whole thing here.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:36 AM | | Comments (2)
        

Another brilliant performance from the MARC trains

This is ridiculous. From this morning's MARCTracker report on metro Washington's commuter trains. The region is ready to get back to work after the summer holidays. But not MARC.

MARCTracker
Live GPS Train Locations MARC Train
Emergency News & Service Update
Welcome MARC Commuters....Welcome MARC Commuters....


CAMDEN NORTH
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

844 College Park 09:24 AM Very Late 64 Min 9:11 AM 9/3/08

CAMDEN SOUTH
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

851 Washington Union Station 09:38 AM Delayed 6 Min 9:10 AM 9/3/08

BRUNSWICK WEST
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

BRUNSWICK EAST
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

P894 Kensington 09:21 AM Very Late 56 Min 9:11 AM 9/3/08

P880 Garrett Park 09:18 AM Very Late 34 Min 9:10 AM 9/3/08

PENN NORTH
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

412 -- Pending -- No Report 8:40 AM 9/3/08

410 New Carrollton 09:23 AM Very Late 51 Min 9:10 AM 9/3/08

PENN SOUTH
Train No. Next Station EST Depart Status Delay Last Update Message

419 West Baltimore 09:17 AM On Time 3 Min 9:11 AM 9/3/08

521 Aberdeen 09:16 AM Delayed 6 Min 9:11 AM 9/3/08

417 Washington Union Station 09:12 AM On Time 9:09 AM 9/3/08


Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:22 AM | | Comments (2)
        

September 2, 2008

Agony nears end for alternative minimum tax options

After years of pressure, the IRS has finally agreed to temporarily stop forcing people to pay back alternative minimum tax owed on incentive stock options that crashed in the early 2000s. IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman wrote to Sen. Chuck Grassley last week and pledged to hold off on collections to give Congress a chance to fix the problem in the law.

Many people employed by tech companies in the late 1990s exercised incentive stock options and held onto the shares, which later crashed. They got little or no cash out of the deals. Yet under the alternative minimum tax, they owed tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars in income tax. These folks owed tax on income they never received. People have been trying to get Congress to fix the problem retroactively and to get the IRS to lay off the pit bull act. Finally, it is. At least a little.

From Shulman's letter to Grassley:

To provide Congress with an opportunity to enact the pending legislation [to fix the problem], the IRS will not undertake collection enforcement action through the end of this fiscal year on these cases... If the pending legislation is not enacted this fiscal year, the IRS will then continue to administer programs in accordence with current law, and in fairness to the thousands of taxpayers who have already made sacrifices to pay taxes due under this provision of the tax code.

The end of the fiscal year is Sept. 30

Posted by Jay Hancock at 11:13 AM | | Comments (1)
        

Sarah Palin and taxes

Interesting post from Kevin Drum on Palin's tax policy as governor of Alaska. She appears to be more receptive to at least certain tax increases than many Republicans.

Last September she proposed a new state tax plan called ACES, and by November she had successfully pushed it through the Alaska legislature in a special session. ACES had two goals. First, it replaced a year-old plan called PPT that was mired in corruption and was widely distrusted. No problem there. Second, it was designed to increase revenue. PPT had raised revenues by $1 billion, but that was still less than everyone expected. So Palin's plan increased that by another $700 million.
Posted by Jay Hancock at 10:20 AM | | Comments (0)
        

Oil plummets as Gustav spares Gulf coast

Oil is down some $7 a barrel this morning, which is good news for the economy. Gold fell sharply, too, back to near $800. Other commodity prices are also plunging. The Dow is up more than 200 points.

Posted by Jay Hancock at 9:54 AM | | Comments (0)
        
Keep reading
Recent entries
Archives
Categories
About Jay Hancock
Jay Hancock has been a financial columnist for The Baltimore Sun since 2001. He has also been The Baltimore Sun's diplomatic correspondent in Washington and its chief economics writer. Before moving to Baltimore in 1994 he worked for The Virginian-Pilot of Norfolk and The Daily Press of Newport News.

His columns appear Tuesdays and Sundays.
-- ADVERTISEMENT --

Most Recent Comments
Baltimore Sun coverage
Sign up for FREE business alerts
Get free Sun alerts sent to your mobile phone.*
Get free Baltimore Sun mobile alerts
Sign up for Business text alerts

Returning user? Update preferences.
Sign up for more Sun text alerts
*Standard message and data rates apply. Click here for Frequently Asked Questions.
Charm City Current
Stay connected